Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Office Ductoscopy for Surgical Selection in Women with Pathologic Nipple Discharge

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pathologic nipple discharge (PND) is diagnosed clinically and managed by diagnostic duct excision (DDE). Mammary ductoscopy in the office setting may change this standard. We performed a prospective study to assess the utility of office ductoscopy for surgical selection in women with nipple discharge.

Methods

Women with nipple discharge meeting at least 2 of 3 criteria of PND (spontaneous, single duct, bloody or serous) underwent office ductoscopy. Those showing papillomatous lesions underwent DDE in the operating room (surgical group, n = 38); if no lesion was present, women were followed clinically (observation group, n = 21).

Results

A papillomatous lesion was identified in 79% of women with 3-criteria PND and in 21% with 2 criteria (P = .001). DDE yielded a proliferative lesion in 35 of 38 women (92%). Of the 38, 27 (71%) had papillomata, 2 (5%) had florid hyperplasia, and 6 (16%) had ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on final pathology. Also, 11 women with papilloma and 1 with DCIS presented with 2-criteria PND. Ductoscopy findings were a better predictor of the presence of intraductal neoplasia (area under curve [AUC] 0.9, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.8–0.98) compared with 3-criteria PND (AUC 0.7, 95% CI 0.6–0.8). The 21 women in the observation group did not develop signs of malignancy or need biopsy during a 48-month follow-up period.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that office ductoscopy provides accurate surgical selection of women with nipple discharge and should be considered for women with 2 criteria of PND, and those with negative ductoscopy can be safely observed. These findings need confirmation in a larger study with longer follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dawes LG, Bowen C, Venta LA, Morrow M. Ductography for nipple discharge: no replacement for ductal excision. Surgery. 1998;124:685–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Simmons R, Adamovich T, Brennan M, Christos P, Schultz M, Eisen C, et al. Nonsurgical evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:113–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Morrogh M, Morris EA, Liberman L, Borgen PI, King TA. The predictive value of ductography and magnetic resonance imaging in the management of nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:3369–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Morrogh M, Park A, Elkin EB, King TA. Lessons learned from 416 cases of nipple discharge of the breast. Am J Surg. 2010;200:73–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kapenhas-Valdes E, Feldman SM, Cohen JM, Boolbol SK. Mammary ductoscopy for evaluation of nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2720–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dietz JR, Crowe JP, Grundfest S, Arrigain S, Kim JA, et al. Directed duct excision by using mammary ductoscopy in patients with pathologic nipple discharge. Surgery. 2002;132:582–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hunerbein M, Estevez SL, Schneider U, Schlag PM. Evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge with ductoscopy. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197:697–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moncrief RM, Nayar R, Diaz LK, Staradub VL, Morrow M, Khan SA. A comparison of ductoscopy-guided and conventional surgical excision in women with spontaneous nipple discharge. Ann Surg. 2005;241:575–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu GY, Lu JS, Shen KW, Love S, Zhang JX, Xu XL, et al. Fiberoptic ductoscopy combined with cytology testing in the patients of spontaneous nipple discharge. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;108:271–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma R, Dietz J, Wright H, Crowe J, DiNunzio A, Woletz J, et al. Comparative analysis of minimally invasive microductectomy versus major duct excision in patients with pathologic nipple discharge. Surgery. 2005;138:591–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Montroni I, Santini D, Zucchini G, Fiacchi M, Zanotti S, Ugolini G, et al. Nipple discharge: is its significance as a risk factor for breast cancer fully understood? Observational study including 915 consecutive patients who underwent selective duct excision. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;123:895–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gray RJ, Pockaj BA, Karstaedt PJ. Navigating murky waters: a modern treatment algorithm for nipple discharge. Am J Surg. 2007;194:850–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gioffre’ Florio MA, Manganero T, Pollicino A, Scarfo P, Micali B. Surgical approach to nipple discharge: a ten year experience. J Surg Oncol. 1999;71:235–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cabioglu N, Hunt KK, Singletary SE, Stephens TW, Marcy S, Meric F, et al. Surgical decision making and factors determining a diagnosis of breast carcinoma in women presenting with nipple discharge. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196:354–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tang SS, Twelves DJ, Isacke CM, Gui GP. Mammary ductoscopy in the current management of breast disease. Surg Endosc. 2010 [Epub ahead of print].

  16. Vaughan A, Crowe JP, Brainard J, Dawson A, Kim J, Dietz JR. Mammary ductoscopy and ductal washings for the evaluation of patients with pathologic nipple discharge. Breast J. 2009;15:254–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Louie LD, Crowe JP, Dawson AE, Lee KB, Baynes DL, Dowdy T, et al. Identification of breast cancer in patients with pathologic nipple discharge: does ductoscopy predict malignancy? Am J Surg. 2006;192:530–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kapenhas-Valdes E, Feldman SM, Boolbol SK. The role of mammary ductoscopy in breast cancer: a review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:3350–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sarakbi WA, Escobar PF, Mokbel K. The potential role of breast ductoscopy in breast cancer screening. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2005;50:208–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kamali S, Bender O, Aydin MT, Yuney E, Kamali G. Ductoscopy in the evaluation and management of nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:778–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Denewer A, El-Etribi K, Nada N, El-Metwally M. The role and limitations of mammary ductoscope in management of pathologic nipple discharge. Breast J. 2008;14:442–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Grunwald S, Heyer H, Paepke S, Schwesinger G, Schimming A, Hahn M, et al. Diagnostic value of ductoscopy in the diagnosis of nipple discharge and intraductal proliferations in comparison to standard methods. Onkologie. 2007;30:243–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sauter ER, Shan S, Hewett JE, Speckman P, Du Bois GC. Proteomic analysis of nipple aspirate fluid using SELDI-TOF-MS. Int J Cancer. 2005;114:791–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fackler MJ, Rivers A, Teo WW, Mangat A, Taylor E, Zhang Z, et al. Hypermethylated genes as biomarkers of cancer in women with pathologic nipple discharge. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:3802–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seema A. Khan MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khan, S.A., Mangat, A., Rivers, A. et al. Office Ductoscopy for Surgical Selection in Women with Pathologic Nipple Discharge. Ann Surg Oncol 18, 3785–3790 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1791-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1791-3

Keywords

Navigation