Abstract
Background
There is no consensus on the optimal method of primary tumor control, determined by preoperative clinical factors, during sentinel node (SN) navigation surgery for early gastric cancer (EGC). In this study, we investigated the accuracy of clinical diagnosis based on preoperative examination in patients with EGC and proposed surgical options for primary tumor control during SN navigation surgery.
Methods
We analyzed 815 patients with clinical stage IA gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy at the National Cancer Center in Korea between March 2001 and February 2011. The clinical stage was determined by endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography, and abdominal computed tomography.
Results
The preoperative assessment of tumor depth and tumor size was accurate in 57.5 and 70.8 % of patients, respectively. Tumor depth and size were underestimated in 8 and 25.3 % of patients. The overall accuracy of histologic diagnosis by endoscopic biopsy was 87.2 %. Of those tumors diagnosed preoperatively as differentiated, 20.5 % revealed mixed histology of undifferentiated type.
Conclusions
The recommendation for SN biopsy may be limited to tumors sized 3 cm or smaller to avoid positive lateral margins and to minimize the risk of skip metastases. Endoscopic resection may safely be applied to small mucosal cancers, but other surgical options should be employed for undifferentiated large mucosal lesions, given their tendency for diffuse invasion. Full-thickness resection is preferable for submucosal cancers, to secure clear vertical margins.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(2):113–23.
Kitagawa Y, Takeuchi H, Takagi Y, et al. Prospective multicenter trial of sentinel node mapping for gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(15S):4518.
Ichikura T, Sugasawa H, Sakamoto N, Yaguchi Y, Tsujimoto H, Ono S. Limited gastrectomy with dissection of sentinel node stations for early gastric cancer with negative sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg. 2009;249(6):942–7.
Ryu KW. Quality control study of laparoscopic sentinel node biopsy in early gastric cancer. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01544413. Accessed 18 Dec 2012.
Washington K. 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(12):3077–9.
Sano T, Okuyama Y, Kobori O, Shimizu T, Morioka Y. Early gastric cancer. Endoscopic diagnosis of depth of invasion. Dig Dis Sci. 1990;35(11):1340–4.
Yanai H, Noguchi T, Mizumachi S, et al. A blind comparison of the effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopy in staging early gastric cancer. Gut. 1999;44(3):361–5.
Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Yoo MW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of T and N stages with endoscopy, stomach protocol CT, and endoscopic ultrasonography in early gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99(1):20–7.
Akahoshi K, Chijiwa Y, Hamada S, et al. Pretreatment staging of endoscopically early gastric cancer with a 15 MHz ultrasound catheter probe. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48(5):470–6.
Kim AY, Kim HJ, Ha HK. Gastric cancer by multidetector row CT: preoperative staging. Abdom Imag. 2005;30(4):465–72.
Kim JH, Song KS, Youn YH, et al. Clinicopathologic factors influence accurate endosonographic assessment for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66(5):901–8.
Margulies C, Krevsky B, Catalano MF. How accurate are endoscopic estimates of size? Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40(2 Pt 1):174–7.
Kim JH, Lee YC, Kim H, et al. Endoscopic resection for undifferentiated early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69(4):e1–9.
Okabayashi T, Gotoda T, Kondo H, et al. Usefulness of indigo carmine chromoendoscopy and endoscopic clipping for accurate preoperative assessment of proximal gastric cancer. Endoscopy. 2000;32(10):S62.
Sakai Y, Eto R, Kasanuki J, et al. Chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye added to acetic acid in the diagnosis of gastric neoplasia: a prospective comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68(4):635–41.
Bhunchet E, Shibata T. Proposal for two strategies to prevent remnants of gastric cancers after endoscopic mucosal resections: fluorescein electronic endoscopy and rapid stump diagnosis based on pit patterns. Gastric Cancer. 2004;7(4):221–32.
Namieno T, Koito K, Higashi T, et al. Assessing the suitability of gastric carcinoma for limited resection: histologic differentiation of endoscopic biopsy. World J Surg. 1998;22(8):865–8.
Ryu KW, Choi IJ, Doh YW, et al. Surgical indication for non-curative endoscopic resection in early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(12):3428–34.
Takao M, Kakushima N, Takizawa K, et al. Discrepancies in histologic diagnoses of early gastric cancer between biopsy and endoscopic mucosal resection specimens. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15(1):91–6.
Gotoda T, Yanagisawa A, Sasako M, et al. Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers. Gastric Cancer. 2000;3(4):219–25.
Lee SE, Lee JH, Ryu KW, et al. Sentinel node mapping and skip metastases in patients with early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(3):603–8.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by a Grant (NCC 1110550-2) from the National Cancer Center, Republic of Korea.
DISCLOSURES
Drs. Ji Yeon Park, Keun Won Ryu, Bang Wool Eom, Hong Man Yoon, Soo Jin Kim, Soo-Jeong Cho, Jong Yeul Lee, Chan Gyoo Kim, Myeong-Cherl Kook, Il Ju Choi, Byung Ho Nam, and Young-Woo, Kim have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by a Grant (NCC 1110550-2) from the National Cancer Center, Republic of Korea.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Park, J.Y., Ryu, K.W., Eom, B.W. et al. Proposal of the Surgical Options for Primary Tumor Control During Sentinel Node Navigation Surgery Based on the Discrepancy Between Preoperative and Postoperative Early Gastric Cancer Diagnoses. Ann Surg Oncol 21, 1123–1129 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3427-2
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3427-2