Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Anti-tacking Agents on Properties of Gas-Entrapped Membrane and Effervescent Floating Tablets

  • Research Article
  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tackiness caused by the gas-entrapped membrane (Eudragit®RL 30D) was usually observed during storage of the effervescent floating tablets, leading to failure in floatation and sustained release. In this work, common anti-tacking agents (glyceryl monostearate (GMS) and talc) were used to solve this tackiness problem. The impact of anti-tacking agent on the properties of free films and corresponding floating tablets was investigated. GMS was more effective than talc in reducing tackiness of the film. Addition and increasing amount of anti-tacking agents lowered the film mechanical strength, but the coating films were still strong and flexible enough to resist the generated gas pressure inside the floating tablet. Wettability and water vapor permeability of the film decreased with increasing level of anti-tacking agents as a result of their hydrophobicity. No interaction between anti-tacking agents and polymer was observed as confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, powder X-ray diffractometry, and differential scanning calorimetry studies. Increasing amount of anti-tacking agents decreased time to float and tended to retard drug release of the floating tablets. Floating properties and drug release were also influenced by type of anti-tacking agents. The obtained floating tablets still possessed good floating properties and controlled drug release even though anti-tacking agent had some effects. The results demonstrated that the tackiness problem of the floating tablets could be solved by incorporating anti-tacking agent into the gas-entrapped membrane.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singh BN, Kim KH. Floating drug delivery systems: an approach to oral controlled drug delivery via gastric retention. J Control Release. 2000;63(3):235–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Streubel A, Siepmann J, Bodmeier R. Drug delivery to the upper small intestine window using gastroretentive technologies. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2006;6(5):501–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bardonnet PL, Faivre V, Pugh WJ, Piffaretti JC, Falson F. Gastroretentive dosage forms: overview and special case of Helicobacter pylori. J Control Release. 2006;111(1–2):1–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Prajapati VD, Jani GK, Khutliwala TA, Zala BS. Raft forming system—an upcoming approach of gastroretentive drug delivery system. J Control Release. 2013;168(2):151–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arora S, Ali J, Ahuja A, Khar RK, Baboota S. Floating drug delivery systems: a review. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2005;6(3):E372–90.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Meka L, Kesavan B, Chinnala KM, Vobalaboina V, Yamsani MR. Preparation of a matrix type multiple-unit gastro retentive floating drug delivery system for captopril based on gas formation technique: in vitro evaluation. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2008;9(2):612–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yin L, Qin C, Chen K, Zhu C, Cao H, Zhou J, et al. Gastro-floating tablets of cephalexin: preparation and in vitro/in vivo evaluation. Int J Pharm. 2013;452(1–2):241–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sungthongjeen S, Sriamornsak P, Puttipipatkhachorn S. Design and evaluation of floating multi-layer coated tablets based on gas formation. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2008;69(1):255–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sungthongjeen S, Paeratakul O, Limmatvapirat S, Puttipipatkhachorn S. Preparation and in vitro evaluation of a multiple-unit floating drug delivery system based on gas formation technique. Int J Pharm. 2006;324(2):136–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wesseling M, Kuppler F, Bodmeier R. Tackiness of acrylic and cellulosic polymer films used in the coating of solid dosage forms. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 1999;47(1):73–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nimkulrat S, Suchiva K, Phinyocheep P, Puttipipatkhachorn S. Influence of selected surfactants on the tackiness of acrylic polymer films. Int J Pharm. 2004;287(1–2):27–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Anand JN. Contact theory of adhesion. J Adhes. 1973;5(3):265–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wan LSC, Lai WF. The influence of antitack additives on drug release from film-coated granules. Int J Pharm. 1993;94(1–3):39–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fernández Cervera M, Heinämäki J, Räsänen E, Antikainen O, Nieto OM, Iraizoz Colarte A, et al. Determination of tackiness of chitosan film-coated pellets exploiting minimum fluidization velocity. Int J Pharm. 2004;281(1–2):119–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Heng PWS, Wan LSC, Tan YTF. Relationship between aggregation of HPMC coated spheroids and tackiness/viscosity/additives of the coating formulations. Int J Pharm. 1996;138(1):57–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Erdmann H, Gebert S, Kolter K, Schepky G. Studies on modifying the tackiness and drug release of Kollicoat EMM 30 D coatings. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2003;29(4):429–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kucera SA, Stimpel D, Shah NH, Malick AW, Infeld MH, McGinity JW. Influence of fumed silicon dioxide on the stabilization of Eudragit RS/RL 30 D film-coated theophylline pellets. Pharm Dev Technol. 2008;13(3):245–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maejima T, McGinity JW. Influence of film additives on stabilizing drug release rates from pellets coated with acrylic polymers. Pharm Dev Technol. 2001;6(2):211–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu C, McGinity JW. Influence of an enteric polymer on drug release rates of theophylline from pellets coated with Eudragit RS 30D. Pharm Dev Technol. 2003;8(1):103–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Felton L, McGinity JW. Influence of insoluble excipients on film coating systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2002;28(3):225–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Petereit HU, Assmus M, Lehmann KG. Glyceryl monostearate as a glidant in aqueous film-coating formulations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 1995;41(4):219–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Remuñán-López C, Bodmeier R. Mechanical, water uptake and permeability properties of crosslinked chitosan glutamate and alginate films. J Control Release. 1997;44(2–3):215–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sungthongjeen S, Puttipipatkhachorn S, Paeratakul O, Dashevsky A, Bodmeier R. Development of pulsatile release tablets with swelling and rupturable layers. J Control Release. 2004;95(2):147–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Leterme P, Gayot A, Finet G, Bizi M, Flament MP. Influence of the morphogranulometry and hydrophobicity of talc on its antisticking power in the production of tablets. Int J Pharm. 2005;289(1–2):109–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sriamornsak P, Wattanakorn N, Nunthanid J, Puttipipatkhachorn S. Mucoadhesion of pectin as evidence by wettability and chain interpenetration. Carbohydr Polym. 2008;74(3):458–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rongthong T, Sungthongjeen S, Siepmann J, Pongjanyakul T. Quaternary polymethacrylate–magnesium aluminum silicate films: molecular interactions, mechanical properties and tackiness. Int J Pharm. 2013;458(1):57–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yajima T, Itai S, Takeuchi H, Kawashima Y. Determination of optimum processing temperature for transformation of glyceryl monostearate. Chem Pharm Bull. 2002;50(11):1430–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. El-Malah Y, Nazzal S. Effect of Eudragit RS 30D and talc powder on verapamil hydrochloride release from beads coated with drug layered matrices. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2008;9(1):75–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Iannuccelli V, Coppi G, Bernabei MT, Cameroni R. Air compartment multiple-unit system for prolonged gastric residence. Part I. Formulation study. Int J Pharm. 1998;174(1–2):47–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Meka L, Kesavan B, Kalamata VN, Eaga CM, Bandari S, Vobalaboina V, et al. Design and evaluation of polymeric coated minitablets as multiple unit gastroretentive floating drug delivery systems for furosemide. J Pharm Sci. 2009;98(6):2122–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Thailand Research Fund (Grant no. DBG5280007), the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program (Grant No. PHD/0340/2551) under the Thailand Research Fund (TRF), Thailand.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Srisagul Sungthongjeen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kriangkrai, W., Puttipipatkhachorn, S., Sriamornsak, P. et al. Impact of Anti-tacking Agents on Properties of Gas-Entrapped Membrane and Effervescent Floating Tablets. AAPS PharmSciTech 15, 1357–1369 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-014-0161-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-014-0161-4

KEY WORDS

Navigation