Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modulations of face perception in response to a novel time-varying optical perturbation after aberration correction using adaptive optics

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Special Topics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of time in the perception of optical perturbation has received little attention. We sought to establish a novel time-varying perturbation in an image sequence using adaptive optics. We introduced the interpolated blur as a probe of visual processing, including four originally identical image frames whose position and pattern were manipulated to transform the time-averaged aberration. The resulting effects of interpolated blur were measured by comparing the dynamic sequence with the reference stimulus under the same condition of time-averaged aberration. Our results demonstrated that the perception of the time-averaged aberration depends on the optical perturbation, suggesting the potential modulations of interpolated blur on the correction of spatial blur. Our findings provide an entry point to implement adaptive optical correction to investigate dynamic changes of interpolated blurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Desimone, J. Duncan, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 193 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A.B. Watson, A.J. Ahumada, J. Vis. 8, 17 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J.J. Kulikowski, D.J. Tolhurst, J. Physiol. 232, 149 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. G.E. Legge, Vis. Res. 18, 69 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. V.P. Ferrera, T.A. Nealey, J.H. Maunsell, Nature 358, 756 (1992)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. A.M. Derrington, J. Krauskopf, P. Lennie, J. Physiol. 357, 241 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J.J. McAnany, K.R. Alexander, Vis. Res. 46, 1574 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Hegdé, Prog. Neurobiol. 84, 405 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. E.A. Allen, R.D. Freeman, J. Neurosci. 26, 11763 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Liang, D.R. Williams, D.T. Miller, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2884 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Williams, G.-Y. Yoon, J. Porter, A. Guirao, H. Hofer, I. Cox, J. Refract. Surg. 16, S554 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. G.-Y. Yoon, D.R. Williams, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19, 266 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. E.A. Rossi, A. Roorda, J. Vis. 10, 11 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Ravikumar, E.J. Sarver, R.A. Applegate, J. Vis. 12, 11 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. C.-C. Chang, A. Chu, S. Meyer, Y. Ding, M.M. Sun, P. Abiri, K.I. Baek, V. Gudapati, X. Ding, P. Guihard, Theranostics. 11, 1162 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. E. De Lestrange-Anginieur, C.-S. Kee, PLoS One 15, e0234380 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. E. De Lestrange-Anginieur, T. Leung, C. Kee, Vis. Res. 185, 88 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. L. Sawides, C. Dorronsoro, A.M. Haun, E. Peli, S. Marcos, PLoS One 8, e70856 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Radhakrishnan, L. Sawides, C. Dorronsoro, E. Peli, S. Marcos, J. Vis. 15, 15 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. P. Neri, D.J. Heeger, Nat. Neurosci. 5, 812 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Neri, D.M. Levi, J. Neurophysiol. 97, 951 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. L. Chen, B. Singer, A. Guirao, J. Porter, D.R. Williams, Optom. Vis. Sci. 82, 358 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. K.J. Ciuffreda, A. Selenow, B. Wang, B. Vasudevan, G. Zikos, S.R. Ali, Vis. Res. 46, 895 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. E. De Lestrange-Anginieur, C.S. Kee, Heliyon 6, e04153 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J.G. Robson, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 56, 1141 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. L.E. Arend Jr., Vis. Res. 16, 311 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  27. V. Goffaux, J. Peters, J. Haubrechts, C. Schiltz, B. Jansma, R. Goebel, Cereb. Cortex. 21, 467 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. D.L. Ringach, M.J. Hawken, R. Shapley, Nature. 15, 281 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. C.E. Bredfeldt, D.L. Ringach, J. Neurosci. 22, 1976 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. J.A. Mazer, W.E. Vinje, J. McDermott, P.H. Schiller, J.L. Gallant, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 99, 1645 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. D.L. Ringach, M.J. Hawken, R. Shapley, J. Neurophysiol. 90, 342 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. M.D. Menz, R.D. Freeman, J. Neurophysiol. 91, 1782 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. M. Volgushev, T.R. Vidyasagar, X. Pei, Vis. Neurosci. 12, 621 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. C.K. Abbey, M.P. Eckstein, Front. Psychol. 5, 345 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. J.M. Gold, Front. Psychol. 5, 142 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  36. C.P. Taylor, P.J. Bennett, A.B. Sekuler, Front. Psychol. 5, 578 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  37. H. Guo, E. DeLestrange, J. Biom. Opt. 20, 036008 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. K.M. Hampson, I. Munro, C. Paterson, C. Dainty, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 22, 1241 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. E. Dalimier, C. Dainty, J.L. Barbur, J. Mod. Opt. 55, 791 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. D.H. Brainard, Spat. Vis. 10, 433 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. W. Luo, W. Feng, W. He, N.-Y. Wang, Y.-J. Luo, NeuroImage. 49, 1857 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. M. Xia, X. Li, C. Ye, H. Li, Adv. Psychol. Sci. 22, 1556 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. S. Schindler, F. Bublatzky, Cortex. 130, 362 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. P. Vuilleumier, J.L. Armony, J. Driver, R.J. Dolan, Nat. Neurosci. 6, 624 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. T.F. Münte, M. Brack, O. Grootheer, B.M. Wieringa, M. Matzke, S. Johannes, Neurosci. Res. 30, 25 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. V.A. Lamme, P.R. Roelfsema, Trends Neurosci. 23, 571 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. C.E. Metz, Semin. Nucl. Med. 8, 283 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China

    Elie de Lestrange-Anginieur

  2. Applied Optics Group, Department of Experimental Physics, National University of Ireland, Galway, H91 CF50, Ireland

    Elie de Lestrange-Anginieur

  3. Department of Bioengineering, Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, 75080, USA

    Yichen Ding

Authors
  1. Elie de Lestrange-Anginieur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yichen Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yichen Ding.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Lestrange-Anginieur, E., Ding, Y. Modulations of face perception in response to a novel time-varying optical perturbation after aberration correction using adaptive optics. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 231, 713–722 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00393-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00393-6

Search

Navigation