Abstract
We study the quantum discord, the classical correlation and the monogamy relationship for continuous variable in the background of a Schwarzschild black hole. We find that, as the Hawking temperature increases, the Gaussian discord by measuring the mode A first reduces and then appears freezing phenomenon, while the Gaussian discord by measuring the mode B reduces to zero. The interesting phenomenon is that the classical correlation based on measurement on mode B is not affected by the Hawking radiation and remains constant, while the classical correlation based on measurement on mode A reduces with increasing Hawking temperature. Furthermore, we find two monogamy relationships between quantum and classical correlations, which means that the lost quantum correlation is transformed into the classical correlation by the Hawking effect. This shows that the quantum correlation is not really lost in Schwarzschild black hole, but just converted from one form to another. This has important implications for understanding the black hole information paradox from the perspective of quantum correlation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data.
References
I. Fuentes-Schuller, R.B. Mann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 120404 (2005)
P.M. Alsing, I. Fuentes-Schuller, R.B. Mann, T.E. Tessier, Phys. Rev. A 74, 032326 (2006)
E. Martín-Martínez, I. Fuentes, Phys. Rev. A 83, 052306 (2011)
Y. Dai, Z. Shen, Y. Shi, Phys. Rev. D 94, 025012 (2016)
Y. Yang, J. Jing, Z. Tian, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 688 (2022)
E. Martín-Martínez, L. Garay, J. León, Phys. Rev. D 82, 064006 (2010)
Z. Tian, J. Du, Phys. Rev. D 103, 085014 (2021)
X. Liu, J. Jing, Z. Tian, W. Yao, Phys. Rev. D 103, 125025 (2021)
S.M. Wu, H.S. Zeng, H.M. Cao, Class. Quantum Grav. 38, 185007 (2021)
G. Adesso, I. Fuentes-Schuller, M. Ericsson, Phys. Rev. A 76, 062112 (2007)
G. Adesso, S. Ragy, D. Girolami, Class. Quantum Grav. 29, 224002 (2012)
B. Richter, K. Lorek, A. Dragan, Y. Omar, Phys. Rev. D 95, 076004 (2017)
K. Debski, A. Dragan, Phys. Rev. D 98, 025003 (2018)
T. Li, B. Zhang, L. You, Phys. Rev. D 97, 045005 (2018)
S. Bhattacharya, N. Joshi, Phys. Rev. D 105, 065007 (2022)
J. Wang, H. Cao, J. Jing, H. Fan, Phys. Rev. D 93, 125011 (2016)
S.M. Wu, H.S. Zeng, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 4 (2022)
Z. Liu, J. Zhang, R.B. Mann, H. Yu, Phys. Rev. D 105, 085012 (2022)
Z. Liu, J. Zhang, H. Yu, J. High Energy Phys. 08, 020 (2021)
T. Liu, J. Jing, J. Wang, Adv. Quantum Technol. 1, 1800072 (2018)
T. Liu, J. Wang, J. Jing, H. Fan, Ann. Phys. 390, 334–344 (2018)
K. Gallock-Yoshimura, E. Tjoa, R.B. Mann, Phys. Rev. D 104, 025001 (2021)
S.M. Wu, H.S. Zeng, T. Liu, New J. Phys. 24, 073004 (2022)
W.G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D 14, 870 (1976)
L.C.B. Crispino, A. Higuchi, G.E.A. Matsas, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 787 (2008)
L. Bombelli, R.K. Koul, J. Lee, R.D. Sorkin, Phys. Rev. D 34, 373 (1986)
S.W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975)
S.W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D 14, 2460 (1976)
H. Terashima, Phys. Rev. D 61, 104016 (2000)
The Physics of Quantum Information, edited by D. Bouwmeester, A. Ekert, A. Zeilinger (Springer, Berlin, 2000)
D. Boschi, S. Branca, F.D. Martini, L. Hardy, S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1121 (1998)
J.W. Pan, C. Simon, C. Brukner, A. Zeilinger, Nature (London) 410, 1067 (2001)
A. Peres, D.R. Terno, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 93 (2004)
H. Ollivier, W.H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 017901 (2001)
L. Henderson, V. Vedral, J. Phys. A 34, 6899 (2001)
A. Fedrizzi, M. Zuppardo, G.G. Gillett, M.A. Broome, M.P. Almeida, M. Paternostro, A.G. White, T. Paterek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 230504 (2013)
T.S. Cubitt, F. Verstraete, W. Dür, J.I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 037902 (2003)
K. Modi, A. Brodutch, H. Cable, T. Paterek, V. Vedral, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1655 (2012)
J. Hou, L. Liu, X. Qi, 2001, 01244 (2020)
D. Buono, G. Nocerino, A. Porzio, S. Solimeno, Phys. Rev. A 86, 042308 (2012)
Q.Y. He, Q.H. Gong, M.D. Reid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 060402 (2015)
G. Adesso, A. Serafini, F. Illuminati, Phys. Rev. A 70, 022318 (2004)
G. Adesso, A. Datta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 030501 (2010)
G. Adesso, D. Girolami, A. Serafini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 190502 (2012)
G. Adesso, S. Ragy, A.R. Lee, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 21, 1440001 (2014)
S.M. Wu, H.S. Zeng, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 716 (2022)
N.D. Birrell, P.C.W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982)
Q. Pan, J. Jing, Phys. Rev. D 78, 065015 (2008)
T. Damoar, R. Ruffini, Phys. Rev. D 14, 332 (1976)
S.M. Wu, W.M. Li, H.S. Zeng, X.L. Huang, Quantum Inf. Process. 21, 362 (2022)
S.M. Wu, Y.T. Cai, W.J. Peng, H.S. Zeng, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 412 (2022)
W.C. Qiang, G.H. Sun, Q. Dong, S.H. Dong, Phys. Rev. A 98, 022320 (2018)
S. Xu, X.K. Song, J.D. Shi, L. Ye, Phys. Rev. D 89, 065022 (2014)
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12205133, 1217050862 and 11275064), LJKQZ20222315 and 2021BSL013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, SM., Liu, DD., Wang, CX. et al. Monogamy relationship between quantum and classical correlations for continuous variable in curved spacetime. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 56 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-03655-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-03655-5