Skip to main content
Log in

Vertical extension of Noether theorem for scaling symmetries

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Plus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present a new approach to construct constants of motion associated with scaling symmetries of dynamical systems. Scaling maps could be symmetries of the equations of motion but not of its associated Lagrangian action. We have constructed a Noether inspired theorem in a vertical extended space that can be used to obtain constants of motion for these symmetries. Noether theorem can be obtained as a particular case of our construction. To illustrate how the procedure works, we present two interesting examples, (a) the Schwarzian Mechanics based on Schwarzian derivative operator and (b) the Korteweg–de Vries nonlinear partial differential equation in the context of the asymptotic dynamics of General Relativity on \(\hbox {AdS}_3\). We also study the inverse of Noether theorem for scaling symmetries and show how we can construct and identify the generator of the scaling transformation, and how it works for the vertical extended constant of motion that we are able to construct. We find an interesting contribution to the symmetry associated with the fact that the scaling symmetry is not a Noether symmetry of the action. Finally, we have contrasted our results with recent analysis and previous attempts to find constants of motion associated with these beautiful scaling laws.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Another approach is to work with these type of symmetries in the context of non-Noetherian symmetries (also called s-equivalent symmetries), but we will not follow this approach here. For details, we will refer the reader to [6].

  2. Our notation is

    $$\begin{aligned} \frac{{{\bar{\mathrm{d}}}} C}{\mathrm{d}t}=F^i\frac{\partial C}{\partial \dot{q}^i}+ \dot{q}^i\frac{\partial C}{\partial q^i}+\frac{\partial C}{\partial t}. \end{aligned}$$
  3. This definition of \(\gamma \) has the following property. First identify \(\eta \) with \(\delta q\). We will call it a projection from vertical extended space to configuration space. The projection is then \(\gamma =\delta L\). In terms of the projected \(\gamma \) Noether theorem is just \(EL\left( \gamma \Big |_{\eta =\delta q}\right) \equiv 0\). If the symmetry is non-Noether, \(\gamma \Big |_{\eta =\delta q}\) is an s-equivalent Lagrangian (for details see [6]).

  4. Here, we are restricting ourselves to the case where the equations of motion in configuration space and the equations of motion of the Jacobi fields are independent. For an example where this condition is not fulfilled, see below.

  5. The application of the extended space method to this example must be taken with care. This is because the equations of motion in configuration space and the Jacobi equations are not independent in the sense that the equation of motion for \(\eta \) depends on the “accelerations” of the configuration space \( \rho ^{(4)}(t) \), so the definition of “force” is ambiguous off shell. Nevertheless, our method is able to construct a consistent conserved quantity and symmetries. This fact suggests that the construction of Dirac’s method of constrained dynamics in the extended space could be an interesting research (work in progress).

References

  1. L.D. Landau, Mechanics (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1965)

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. Richard, in Henriksen (Scale Invariance, Self-Similarity of the Physical World-Wiley-VCH, 2015)

  3. L.I. Sedov, Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechanics (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  4. P.M. Zhang, M. Elbistan, P. Horvathy, P. Kosiński, A generalized Noether theorem for scaling symmetry. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135(2), 223 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00247-5. [arXiv:1903.05070 [math-ph]]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. I. Takahisa, Scale invariance and constants of motion. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/pty060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Hojman, L. Nuñez, A. Patiño, H. Rago, Symmetries and conserved quantities in geodesic motion. J. Math. Phys. 27(1), 281–286 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.527375

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Mangiarotti, G. Sardanashvily, Gauge Mechanics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Galajinsky, Schwarzian mechanics via nonlinear realizations. Phys. Lett. B 795, 277–280 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.05.054. [arXiv:1905.01935 [math-ph]]

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. V. de Alfaro, S. Fubini, G. Furlan, Conformal invariance in quantum mechanics. Nuovo Cim. 34 A, 569 (1976)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Filyukov, I. Masterov, On the Schwarzian counterparts of conformal mechanics. [arXiv:2004.03304 [hep-th]]

  11. Work in progress

  12. D. Grumiller, W. Merbis, Near horizon dynamics of three dimensional black holes. SciPost Phys. 8(1), 010 (2020). https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.8.1.010. [arXiv:1906.10694 [hep-th]]

  13. J. Brown, M. Henneaux, Central charges in the Canonical realization of asymptotic symmetries: an example from three-dimensional gravity. Commun. Math. Phys. 104, 207–226 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01211590

  14. A. Pérez, D. Tempo and R. Troncoso, Boundary conditions for General Relativity on AdS3 and the KdV hierarchy. JHEP 6, 103 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2016)103. [arXiv:1605.04490 [hep-th]]

  15. H.A. González, J. Matulich, M. Pino, R. Troncoso, Revisiting the asymptotic dynamics of general relativity on AdS3. JHEP 12, 115 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2018)115. [arXiv:1809.02749 [hep-th]]

  16. E. Ojeda, A. Pérez, Boundary conditions for general relativity in three-dimensional spacetimes, integrable systems and the KdV/mKdV hierarchies. JHEP 8, 079 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2019)079. [arXiv:1906.11226 [hep-th]]

  17. P.M. Zhang, M. Cariglia, M. Elbistan, G. Gibbons, P. Horvathy, “Kepler Harmonies” and confor- mal symmetries. Phys. Lett. B 792, 324–328 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.03.057. [arXiv:1903.01436 [gr-qc]]

  18. M. Henneaux, On the use of auxiliary fields in classical mechanics and in field theory, in M.J. Gotay, J.E. Marsden, V. Moncrief (Eds.), Mathematical Aspects of Classical Field Theory: Proceedings of the AMS-IMS-SIAM Joint Summer Research Conference (pp. 393–401). (Contemporary mathematics, 132). Providence, Rhode Island, USA: American Mathematical Society (1992)

  19. P.J. Olver, Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations, 2nd edn. (Springer, Berlin, 1998)

  20. P. Olver, On the Hamiltonian structure of evolution equations. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 88(1), 71–88 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100057364

  21. V. Rosenhaus, R. Shankar, Quasi-Noether systems and quasi-Lagrangians. Symmetry 11(2019), 1008. arXiv:1907.07123v2

  22. V. Rosenhaus, G.H. Katzin, On symmetries, conservation laws, and variational problems for partial differential equations. J. Math. Phys. 35(1994), 1998–2012 (1994)

Download references

Acknowledgements

RA was partially supported by a PhD. CONACyT fellowship number 744575. DGR is supported with a CONACyT Ph.D. fellowship number 332577. The work of JAG was partially supported CONACyT Grant A1-S-22886 and DGAPA-UNAM Grant IN107520.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Antonio García.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 A1: Symmetries of the equations of motion

The infinitesimal symmetries of the equations of motion obey a very interesting relation known as the Jacobi equation, or the second variation of the Lagrangian action, if the system admits a variational formulation. But these symmetries are defined just as symmetries of the equation of motion, independently of whether the equations of motion admit a variational formulation or not. They are defined as infinitesimal transformations that map solutions of the dynamical system into solutions of the dynamical system. First, we can associate with every infinitesimal symmetry that also moves the time

$$\begin{aligned} \delta q^i={\bar{q}}^i({\bar{t}})-q^i(t),\qquad \delta t={\bar{t}}-t, \end{aligned}$$

an infinitesimal symmetry that does not move time, given by

$$\begin{aligned} \Delta q^i=\delta q^i-\dot{q}^i \delta t. \end{aligned}$$

Now, if we define \(\Delta q^i=\eta ^i(q,\dot{q},t),\) it will be a symmetry of the equations of motion iff

$$\begin{aligned} \ddot{q}^i-F^i(q^j,\dot{q}^j,t)=0 \quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad \ddot{{\bar{q}}}^i-F^i({{\bar{q}}}^j,\dot{{\bar{q}}}^j,t)=0, \end{aligned}$$

which in turn implies [6]

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{{\bar{\mathrm{d}}}}{\mathrm{d}t}\frac{{\bar{\mathrm{d}}}}{\mathrm{d}t} \eta ^i-\frac{\partial F^i}{\partial \dot{q}^j}\frac{{\bar{\mathrm{d}}}}{\mathrm{d}t}\eta ^j- \frac{\partial F^i}{\partial q^j} \eta ^j=0. \end{aligned}$$
(106)

So, every symmetry of the equations of motion (including Noether symmetries) are solutions of this equation. In particular, for the scaling transformation \(\eta ^i=aq^i-b\dot{q}^i t\), the Jacobi equation gives

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{{\bar{\mathrm{d}}}}{\mathrm{d}t}\frac{{\bar{\mathrm{d}}}}{\mathrm{d}t} (a q^i-b\dot{q}^i t)-\frac{\partial F^i}{\partial \dot{q}^j}\frac{{\bar{\mathrm{d}}}}{\mathrm{d}t}(a q^j-b\dot{q}^j t)- \frac{\partial F^i}{\partial q^j} (a q^j-b\dot{q}^j t)=0, \end{aligned}$$
(107)

which in turn implies the following condition for the forces of the dynamical system

$$\begin{aligned} -bt\frac{\partial F^i}{\partial t}+(a-2b)F^i-(a-b) \frac{\partial F^i}{\partial \dot{q}^j}\dot{q}^j-\frac{\partial F^i}{\partial q^j} a q^j=0. \end{aligned}$$
(108)

For all the examples that we have considered, these equations are fulfilled. We are unaware if these relations were considered previously in the literature. In the case of AFF conformal mechanics, \(F\sim \frac{1}{q^3}\), and \(a=1,b=2\), so the equation (108) reduces to

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial F}{\partial q} q=-3 F, \end{aligned}$$

thus, F must be a homogeneous function of degree \(-3\) as expected.

1.2 A2: The Jacobi equation in terms of the Lagrangian

The coefficients of the Jacobi equation in terms of the Lagrangian function L are

$$\begin{aligned} W_{ij}= & {} \frac{\partial ^2 L}{\partial \dot{q}^i\partial \dot{q}^j}, \end{aligned}$$
(109)
$$\begin{aligned} N_{ij}= & {} \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\left( \frac{\partial ^2 L}{\partial \dot{q}^i\partial \dot{q}^j}\right) +\frac{\partial ^2 L}{\partial \dot{q}^i\partial q^j}-\frac{\partial ^2 L}{\partial q^i\partial \dot{q}^j}, \end{aligned}$$
(110)

and

$$\begin{aligned} M_{ij}=\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\left( \frac{\partial ^2 L}{\partial \dot{q}^i\partial q^j}\right) -\frac{\partial ^2 L}{\partial q^i\partial q^j}. \end{aligned}$$
(111)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

García, J.A., Gutiérrez-Ruiz, D. & Sánchez-Isidro, R.A. Vertical extension of Noether theorem for scaling symmetries. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00987-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00987-4

Navigation