Abstract
The aim of this paper is to present a new approach to construct constants of motion associated with scaling symmetries of dynamical systems. Scaling maps could be symmetries of the equations of motion but not of its associated Lagrangian action. We have constructed a Noether inspired theorem in a vertical extended space that can be used to obtain constants of motion for these symmetries. Noether theorem can be obtained as a particular case of our construction. To illustrate how the procedure works, we present two interesting examples, (a) the Schwarzian Mechanics based on Schwarzian derivative operator and (b) the Korteweg–de Vries nonlinear partial differential equation in the context of the asymptotic dynamics of General Relativity on \(\hbox {AdS}_3\). We also study the inverse of Noether theorem for scaling symmetries and show how we can construct and identify the generator of the scaling transformation, and how it works for the vertical extended constant of motion that we are able to construct. We find an interesting contribution to the symmetry associated with the fact that the scaling symmetry is not a Noether symmetry of the action. Finally, we have contrasted our results with recent analysis and previous attempts to find constants of motion associated with these beautiful scaling laws.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Another approach is to work with these type of symmetries in the context of non-Noetherian symmetries (also called s-equivalent symmetries), but we will not follow this approach here. For details, we will refer the reader to [6].
Our notation is
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{{{\bar{\mathrm{d}}}} C}{\mathrm{d}t}=F^i\frac{\partial C}{\partial \dot{q}^i}+ \dot{q}^i\frac{\partial C}{\partial q^i}+\frac{\partial C}{\partial t}. \end{aligned}$$This definition of \(\gamma \) has the following property. First identify \(\eta \) with \(\delta q\). We will call it a projection from vertical extended space to configuration space. The projection is then \(\gamma =\delta L\). In terms of the projected \(\gamma \) Noether theorem is just \(EL\left( \gamma \Big |_{\eta =\delta q}\right) \equiv 0\). If the symmetry is non-Noether, \(\gamma \Big |_{\eta =\delta q}\) is an s-equivalent Lagrangian (for details see [6]).
Here, we are restricting ourselves to the case where the equations of motion in configuration space and the equations of motion of the Jacobi fields are independent. For an example where this condition is not fulfilled, see below.
The application of the extended space method to this example must be taken with care. This is because the equations of motion in configuration space and the Jacobi equations are not independent in the sense that the equation of motion for \(\eta \) depends on the “accelerations” of the configuration space \( \rho ^{(4)}(t) \), so the definition of “force” is ambiguous off shell. Nevertheless, our method is able to construct a consistent conserved quantity and symmetries. This fact suggests that the construction of Dirac’s method of constrained dynamics in the extended space could be an interesting research (work in progress).
References
L.D. Landau, Mechanics (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1965)
N. Richard, in Henriksen (Scale Invariance, Self-Similarity of the Physical World-Wiley-VCH, 2015)
L.I. Sedov, Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechanics (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1993)
P.M. Zhang, M. Elbistan, P. Horvathy, P. Kosiński, A generalized Noether theorem for scaling symmetry. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135(2), 223 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00247-5. [arXiv:1903.05070 [math-ph]]
I. Takahisa, Scale invariance and constants of motion. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/pty060
S. Hojman, L. Nuñez, A. Patiño, H. Rago, Symmetries and conserved quantities in geodesic motion. J. Math. Phys. 27(1), 281–286 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.527375
L. Mangiarotti, G. Sardanashvily, Gauge Mechanics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998)
A. Galajinsky, Schwarzian mechanics via nonlinear realizations. Phys. Lett. B 795, 277–280 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.05.054. [arXiv:1905.01935 [math-ph]]
V. de Alfaro, S. Fubini, G. Furlan, Conformal invariance in quantum mechanics. Nuovo Cim. 34 A, 569 (1976)
S. Filyukov, I. Masterov, On the Schwarzian counterparts of conformal mechanics. [arXiv:2004.03304 [hep-th]]
Work in progress
D. Grumiller, W. Merbis, Near horizon dynamics of three dimensional black holes. SciPost Phys. 8(1), 010 (2020). https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.8.1.010. [arXiv:1906.10694 [hep-th]]
J. Brown, M. Henneaux, Central charges in the Canonical realization of asymptotic symmetries: an example from three-dimensional gravity. Commun. Math. Phys. 104, 207–226 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01211590
A. Pérez, D. Tempo and R. Troncoso, Boundary conditions for General Relativity on AdS3 and the KdV hierarchy. JHEP 6, 103 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2016)103. [arXiv:1605.04490 [hep-th]]
H.A. González, J. Matulich, M. Pino, R. Troncoso, Revisiting the asymptotic dynamics of general relativity on AdS3. JHEP 12, 115 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2018)115. [arXiv:1809.02749 [hep-th]]
E. Ojeda, A. Pérez, Boundary conditions for general relativity in three-dimensional spacetimes, integrable systems and the KdV/mKdV hierarchies. JHEP 8, 079 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2019)079. [arXiv:1906.11226 [hep-th]]
P.M. Zhang, M. Cariglia, M. Elbistan, G. Gibbons, P. Horvathy, “Kepler Harmonies” and confor- mal symmetries. Phys. Lett. B 792, 324–328 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.03.057. [arXiv:1903.01436 [gr-qc]]
M. Henneaux, On the use of auxiliary fields in classical mechanics and in field theory, in M.J. Gotay, J.E. Marsden, V. Moncrief (Eds.), Mathematical Aspects of Classical Field Theory: Proceedings of the AMS-IMS-SIAM Joint Summer Research Conference (pp. 393–401). (Contemporary mathematics, 132). Providence, Rhode Island, USA: American Mathematical Society (1992)
P.J. Olver, Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations, 2nd edn. (Springer, Berlin, 1998)
P. Olver, On the Hamiltonian structure of evolution equations. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 88(1), 71–88 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100057364
V. Rosenhaus, R. Shankar, Quasi-Noether systems and quasi-Lagrangians. Symmetry 11(2019), 1008. arXiv:1907.07123v2
V. Rosenhaus, G.H. Katzin, On symmetries, conservation laws, and variational problems for partial differential equations. J. Math. Phys. 35(1994), 1998–2012 (1994)
Acknowledgements
RA was partially supported by a PhD. CONACyT fellowship number 744575. DGR is supported with a CONACyT Ph.D. fellowship number 332577. The work of JAG was partially supported CONACyT Grant A1-S-22886 and DGAPA-UNAM Grant IN107520.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 A1: Symmetries of the equations of motion
The infinitesimal symmetries of the equations of motion obey a very interesting relation known as the Jacobi equation, or the second variation of the Lagrangian action, if the system admits a variational formulation. But these symmetries are defined just as symmetries of the equation of motion, independently of whether the equations of motion admit a variational formulation or not. They are defined as infinitesimal transformations that map solutions of the dynamical system into solutions of the dynamical system. First, we can associate with every infinitesimal symmetry that also moves the time
an infinitesimal symmetry that does not move time, given by
Now, if we define \(\Delta q^i=\eta ^i(q,\dot{q},t),\) it will be a symmetry of the equations of motion iff
which in turn implies [6]
So, every symmetry of the equations of motion (including Noether symmetries) are solutions of this equation. In particular, for the scaling transformation \(\eta ^i=aq^i-b\dot{q}^i t\), the Jacobi equation gives
which in turn implies the following condition for the forces of the dynamical system
For all the examples that we have considered, these equations are fulfilled. We are unaware if these relations were considered previously in the literature. In the case of AFF conformal mechanics, \(F\sim \frac{1}{q^3}\), and \(a=1,b=2\), so the equation (108) reduces to
thus, F must be a homogeneous function of degree \(-3\) as expected.
1.2 A2: The Jacobi equation in terms of the Lagrangian
The coefficients of the Jacobi equation in terms of the Lagrangian function L are
and
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
García, J.A., Gutiérrez-Ruiz, D. & Sánchez-Isidro, R.A. Vertical extension of Noether theorem for scaling symmetries. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00987-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00987-4