Skip to main content
Log in

Status of the crystallography beamlines at Diamond Light Source

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Plus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

X-ray crystallography is one of the most widely supported areas of science at Diamond Light Source and is the core technique on a third of the beamlines, accounting for almost a half of user publications across the whole facility. The life science community can currently call on six macromolecular crystallography beamlines (I02, I03, I04, I04-1, I23 and I24) to satisfy the increasing demand for the determination of macromolecular crystal structures from both the academic and pharmaceutical communities. In the physical sciences, there are four beamlines (I11, I15, I16 and I19) that cater for crystallographic studies ranging from the structure solution of small-molecule systems, the determination of structure at extreme conditions and the detailed analysis of the weak diffraction signal from magnetic structures. The physical science beamlines use both single-crystal and powder-diffraction techniques. All the crystallography beamlines at Diamond ensure they undergo a continuous programme of development to enable new technologies and the science they support. In this article, the current status of all the crystallography beamlines at Diamond will be discussed along with some examples of the science they have supported since they became operational.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E.M.H. Duke et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 1234, 165 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. E.M.H. Duke, L.N. Johnson, Proc. R. Soc. A 466, 3421 (2010) DOI:10.1098/rspa.2010.0448.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. F. Cipriani, F. Felisaz, L. Launer, J.-S. Aksoy, H. Casserotto, S. Cusack, M. Dallery, F. di-Chiaro, M. Guijarro, J. Huet, S. Larsen, M. Lentini, J. McCarthy, S. McSweeney, R. Ravelli, M. Renier, C. Taffut, A. Thompson, G.A. Leonard, M.A. Walsh, Acta Cryst. D 62, 1251 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Ohana, L. Jacquamet, J. Joly, A. Bertoni, P. Taunier, L. Michel, P. Charrault, M. Pirocchi, P. Carpentier, F. Borel, R. Kahn, J.-L. Ferrer, J. Appl. Cryst. 37, 72 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Micco, G.W. Collie, A.G. Dale, S.A. Ohnmacht, I. Pazitna, M. Gunaratnam, A.P. Reszka, S.J. Neidle, Med. Chem. 7, 2959 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Evans, D. Axford, R.L. Owen, Acta Cryst. D 67, 261 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C. Porta, A. Kotecha, A. Burman, T. Jackson, J. Ren, S. Loureiro, I.M. Jones, E.E. Fry, D.I. Stuart, B. Charleston, PLoS Pathog 9, e1003255 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Kelly, S. Alcock, H. Patel, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 425, 052009 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Marchal, A. Wagner, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 633, S121 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Delagenière, P. Brenchereau, L. Launer, A.W. Ashton, R. Leal, S. Veyrier, J. Gabadinho, E.J. Gordon, S.D. Jones, K.E. Levik, S.M. McSweeney, S. Monaco, M. Nanao, D. Spruce, O. Svensson, M.A. Walsh, G.A. Leonard, Bioinformatics 27, 3186 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Nowell, S.A. Barnett, K.E. Christensen, S.J. Teat, D.R. Allan, J. Synchrotron Rad. 19, 435 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Argent, A. Greenaway, M. del Carmen Gimenez-Lopez, W. Lewis, H. Nowell, A.N. Khlobystov, N. Champness, M. Schroder, A.J. Blake, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 55 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M.D. Ward, Chem. Commun. 30, 4487 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S.P. Collins, A. Bombardi, A.R. Marshall, J.H Williams, G. Barlow, A.G. Day, M.R. Pearson, R.J. Woolloscroft, R.D. Walton, G. Beutier, G. Nisbet, AIP Conf. Proc. 1234, 303 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. R.D. Johnson, P. Barone, A. Bombardi, R.J Bean, S. Picozzi, P.G. Radaelli, Y.S. Oh, S.W. Cheong, L.C. Chapon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 217206 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. S.P. Thompson, J.E. Parker, J. Potter, T.P. Hill, A. Birt, T.M. Cobb, F. Yuan, C.C. Tang, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80, 075107 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. M.T. Wharmby, J.P.S. Mowat, S.P. Thompson, P.A. Wright, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 1266 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Basham, J. Filik, M.T. Wharmby, P.C.Y. Chang, B. El Kassaby, M. Gerring, A.W. Ashton, Data Analysis WorkbeNch (DAWN), to be published in J. Synchr. Radiat. (2015).

  19. DAWN, Data Analysis WorkbeNch, http://www.dawnsci.org/.

  20. T. Scheler, M. Marqués, Z. Konopková, C.L. Guillaume, R.T. Howie, E. Gregoryanz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 215503 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. T. Kottke, D. Stalke, J. Appl. Cryst. 26, 615 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. R. Allan.

Additional information

Contribution to the Focus Point on “Status of third-generation synchrotron crystallography beamlines: An overview” edited by Gaston Garcia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allan, D.R., Collins, S.P., Evans, G. et al. Status of the crystallography beamlines at Diamond Light Source. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 130, 56 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2015-15056-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2015-15056-x

Keywords

Navigation