Skip to main content
Log in

Simulations: The dark side

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Plus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics methods. Both methods are, in principle, simple. However, simple does not mean risk-free. In the literature, many of the pitfalls in the field are mentioned, but usually as a footnote --and these footnotes are scattered over many papers. The present paper focuses on the “dark side” of simulation: it is one big footnote. I should stress that “dark”, in this context, has no negative moral implication. It just means: under-exposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B.J. Alder, T.E. Wainwright, J. Chem. Phys. 27, 1208 (1957)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. W.W. Wood, J.D. Jacobson, J. Chem. Phys. 27, 1207 (1957)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. D.P. Landau, K. Binder, A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulations in Statistical Physics, Second edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005)

  4. M.J. Mandell, J. Stat. Phys. 15, 299 (1976)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Parrinello, A. Rahman, J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182 (1981)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Najafabadi, S. Yip, Scripta Metall. 17, 1199 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Filion, M. Marechal, B. van Oorschot, D. Pelt, F. Smallenburg, M. Dijkstra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 188302 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. M.P. Allen, A.J. Masters, Mol. Phys. 79, 277 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. M.P. Allen, Phys. Rev. E 47, 4611 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Binder, Phys. Rev. A 25, 1699 (1982)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Angioletti-Uberti, M. Ceriotti, P.D. Lee, M.W. Finnis, Phys. Rev. B 81, 125416 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. K.S. Shing, K.E. Gubbins, Mol. Phys. 49, 1121 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. C.H. Bennett, J. Comput. Phys. 22, 245 (1976)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Pronk, D. Frenkel, J. Chem. Phys. B 105, 6722 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. N.B. Wilding, P. Sollich, A Monte Carlo method for chemical potential determination in single and multiple occupancy crystals, arXiv:1209.3228 (2012)

  16. F. Smallenburg, L. Filion, M. Marechal, M. Dijkstra, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 17886 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Frenkel, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 17728 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. B.M. Mladek, P. Charbonneau, D. Frenkel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 235702 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. M.M. Tai, Diabetes Care 17, 152 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. G.O. Roberts, A. Gelman, W.R. Gilks, Ann. Appl. Prob. 7, 110 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. A.W. Lees, S.F. Edwards, J. Phys. C 5, 1921 (1972)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Frenkel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frenkel, D. Simulations: The dark side. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 128, 10 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2013-13010-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2013-13010-8

Keywords

Navigation