Skip to main content
Log in

A new perspective of the Abraham-Minkowski controversy

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Plus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

In the present work we analyze the old controversy of Abraham and Minkowski from the microscopic point of view, and from the perspective of a momentum balance equation. Thus we complete the line of research on this subject initiated by Lai et al. (H.M. Lai, W.M. Suen, K. Young, Phys. Rev. A 25, 1755 (1982)). We find that a new term, - \( {\frac{{1}}{{c}}}\) \( {\frac{{\partial \mathbf{m}}}{{\partial t}}}\)×E , justified with several arguments, some of which founded in relativity theory, gives a more coherent view of the controversy. As a test for this approach, we show that the Helmholtz force density may be obtained from a momentum balance equation derived directly from Maxwell’s equations under certain approximations; we find with this analysis that rather than resolve the controversy, we can dissolve it. That is, we have rather a problem of physical interpretation, since we show that other momentum balance equations are also all legitimate implications of Maxwell’s equations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1975)

  2. J.A. Stratton, Electromagnetic Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1941)

  3. W. Pauli, Theory of Relativity (Pergamon, London, 1958), translated from Encyklopedia der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Vol. V19 (Tuebner, Leipzig, 1921), with supplementary notes by the author (1956)

  4. J.P. Gordon, Phys. Rev. A 8, 14 (1973)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. G.B. Walker, D.G. Lahoz, Nature 253, 339 (1975)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. R.V. Jones, Proc. R. Soc. London A 360, 365 (1978)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. H.M. Lai, Am. J. Phys. 62, 658 (1980)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz, L.P. Pitaevski, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1984)

  9. S. Weilong, Y. Jianhui, F. Raohui, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 243601 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R.V. Jones, J.C.S. Richards, Proc. R. Soc. London A 221, 480 (1954)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. C. Møller, The Theory of Relativity (Oxford, London, 1972)

  12. A. Ashkin, J.M. Dziedzic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 139 (1973)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. R.V. Jones, B. Leslie, Proc. R. Soc. London A 360, 347 (1978)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. A.F. Gibson, M.F. Kimmitt, A.O. Koogian, D.E. Evans, F.D. Levy, Proc. R. Soc. London A 370, 303 (1980)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. F.S. Johnson, B.L. Gragin, R.R. Hodges, Am. J. Phys. 62, 33 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. C. Baxter, M. Babiker, R. Loudon, Phys. Rev. A 47, 1278 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. G.K. Campbell, A.E. Leanhardt, J. Mun, M. Boyd, E.W. Streed, W. Ketterle, D.E. Pritchard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 170403 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Mansuripur, Opt. Express 13, 2245 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. H.M. Lai, C.K. Ng, K. Young, Phys. Rev. A 30, 1060 (1984)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. M.A. López-Mariño, J.L. Jiménez, Found. Phys. Lett. 17, 1 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. R. Loudon, S.M. Barnett, C. Baxter, Phys. Rev. A 71, 063802 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. U. Leonhardt, Phys. Rev. A 73, 032108 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. R.N. Pfeifer, T.A. Nieminen, N.R. Heckenberg, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 1197 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. J.L. Jiménez, I. Campos, M.A. López-Mariño, Eur. J. Phys. 32, 739 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. B.A. Kemp, T.M. Grzegorczyk, Opt. Lett. 36, 493 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. W.K.H. Panofsky, M. Phillips, Classical Electricity and Magnetism (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1962)

  27. H.M. Lai, W.M. Suen, K. Young, Phys. Rev. A 25, 1755 (1982)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. R. Peierls, Proc. R. Soc. London A 347, 475 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. V.E. Lembessis, M. Babiker, C. Baxter, R. Loudon, Phys. Rev. A 48, 1594 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. S.M. Barnett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 070401 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. M.A. López-Mariño, J.L. Jiménez, I. Campos, Nuovo Cimento B 125, 361 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  32. W. Schockley, R.P. James, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 876 (1967)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. S. Coleman, J.H. Van Vleck, Phys. Rev. 171, 1370 (1968)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. O. Costa de Beauregard, Phys. Lett. A 24, 177 (1967)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. G.P. Fisher, Am. J. Phys. 39, 1528 (1971)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Y. Aharonov, P. Pearle, L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. A 37, 4052 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. M.M. Bredov, V.V. Rumyantsev, I.N. Toptiguin, Classical Electrodynamics (Nauka, Moscow, 1985)

  38. J.L. Jiménez, I. Campos, The Balance of Energy and Momentum in Classical Electrodynamics in Advanced Electromagnetism: Foundations, Theory and Applications, edited by T. Barret, D. Grimes (World Scientific, New Jersey, 1995)

  39. I. Campos, J.L. Jimenez, Eur. J. Phys. 13, 117 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. F. Rasetti, Phys. Rev. 60, 1 (1944)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. G.H. Wannier, Phys. Rev. 72, 304 (1947)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jiménez, J.L., Campos, I. & López-Mariño, M.A. A new perspective of the Abraham-Minkowski controversy. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 126, 50 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2011-11050-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2011-11050-8

Navigation