Abstract.
Until recently, natural gas encountered in tight shales, which provided the source and seal of the gas, was considered uneconomical to produce. Although unconventional formations may be as porous as other reservoir rocks, their exceedingly small pore sizes and low permeability render them resistant to gas movement. Considering their importance to gas transport, we outline the characteristics of shale rocks, the mechanisms of Fickian and Knudsen diffusion as well as Klinkenberg's permeability. Given the challenges in unlocking natural gas from tight formations, various techniques such as the generation of artificial fractures and the introduction of pressurised fluids are detailed. To identify the parameters which govern natural gas production, we propose a computational porous rock model inspired from an actual image of a shale formation. The solution of the conservation of mass, momentum and energy equations appear to adequately capture the physics of gas transport at the microscopic level. Permitting the comparison between numerical and analytical gas velocity results, the validation framework we developed, demonstrates good agreement of numerical with theoretical findings. Gas pressure and velocity results point to the importance of pore throats, shale permeability and pressure maintenance in dislodging gas from the shale formations.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L. Chen et al., Sci. Rep. 5, 8089 (2015)
W. Ali, Modeling Gas Production from Shales and Coal-beds, MS Report of Stanford University, Stanford, CA, Oct. 2012
M.A. Miller, C.D. Jenkins, R.R. Rai, in SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2010) https://doi.org/10.2118/139097-MS
R. Heller, M. Zoback, J. Unconv. Oil Gas Resour. 8, 14 (2014)
M. Kalantari-Dahaghi, S.D. Mohaghegh, Oil Gas Coal Technol. 4, 104 (2011)
I. Chapman, Determination of the Controls on Permeability and Transport in Shale by Use of Percolation Models, Thesis, Texas A&M University, 2012.
C. Guo, M. Wei, H. Liu, PloS One 10, e0143649 (2015)
K.S. Lee, T.H. Kim, Integrative Understanding of Shale Gas Reservoirs (Springer International Publishing, 2016) p. 123
A. Mehmani, M. Prodanović, F. Javadpour, Transp. Porous Media 99, 377 (2013)
M. Firouzi et al., Int. J. Coal Geol. 123, 62 (2014)
S. Roy et al., J. Appl. Phys. 93, 4870 (2003)
X. Zhang et al., Sci. Rep. 4, 4843 (2014)
W. He, W. Lv, J.H. Dickerson, Gas Transport in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (Springer, 2014)
R.C. Coelho, R.F. Neumann, Eur. J. Phys. 37, 055102 (2016)
L. Klinkenberg, The permeability of porous media to liquids and gases, in Drilling and Production Practice (American Petroleum Institute, 1941)
D.S. Lee et al., KSCE J. Civil Eng. 15, 679 (2011)
C.R. Clarkson et al., J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 31, 612 (2016)
A. Raoof, S.M. Hassanizadeh, Transp. Porous Media 81, 391 (2010)
E.I. Egbobawaye, Tight Gas Reservoir Characterization in Montney Formation, Northeastern British Columbia, Western Canada (University of Alberta, Canada, 2013)
Z. Chen, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 38, 489 (2000)
K.H. Coats, SPE J. 20, 363 (1980) issue No. 5
ESI-CFD, CFD-ACE+ modules manual V2014 (2014)
J. Ren et al., Transp. Porous Media 106, 285 (2015)
M. Matyka, Z. Koza, AIP Conf. Proc. 1453, 17 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kovalchuk, N., Hadjistassou, C. New insights from shale gas production at the microscopic scale. Eur. Phys. J. E 41, 134 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2018-11741-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2018-11741-5