Skip to main content
Log in

Conformation of charged vesicles: the Debye-Hückel and the low-curvature limit

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal E Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

The shape as well as tension and pressure inside an uncharged vesicle are understood to be determined by the reduced volume of a vesicle. These parameters are important for a vesicle or a biological cell, since they can affect bio-physical processes such as osmosis and permeation, interaction with external agents such as bio-macromolecules as well as thermal fluctuations in a bilayer membrane of a vesicle. Charged membranes are ubiquitous in nature, most biological cell bio-membranes are charged, and therefore the knowledge of shape, tension and pressure of charged vesicles is critical. Additionally, the distribution of charges in the inner and outer leaflets is also important as it can affect the spatial interaction of a bilayer membrane with proteins and other micro and macromolecular species. This work addresses these issues in the low-charge and low-curvature limit. Our analysis indicates that despite a very strong two-way coupling between the charge and the curvature, the shapes of charged vesicles remain similar to that of uncharged vesicles at comparable reduced volumes, even for reasonable values of total charge. However, the tension and pressure values are higher, and are accurately estimated in our analysis. The charge distribution on the outer and inner leaflet which is strongly affected by the curvature is calculated. The value of spontaneous curvature due to charge redistribution is also estimated. The insensitivity of the shape to charges persists even when only the outer leaflet is charged instead of charged inner and outer leaflets.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P.B. Canham, J. Theor. Biol 26, 61 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. W. Helfrich, H. Deuling, J. Phys. (Paris) Colloq. 36, 327 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Deuling, H. Helfrich, J. Phys. (Paris) 37, 1335 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Deuling, H. Helfrich, Biophys. J. 16, 861 (1976)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Jenkins, J. Math. Biol. 4, 149 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Svetina, B. Zeks, Eur. Biophys. J. 17, 101 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. U. Seifert, K. Berndl, R. Lipowsky, Phys. Rev. A 44, 1182 (1991)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wei-Mou Zheng, J. Liu, Phys. Rev. E 48, 2856 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Podgornik, S. Svetina, B. Zeks, Phys. Rev. E 51, 544 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. F. Julicher, U. Seifert, Phys. Rev. E 49, 4728 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Jian-Guo, O.Y. Zhong-Can, Phys. Rev. E 47, 461 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Yeung, G.E. Gilbert, J. Shi, J. Silvius, A. Kapus, S. Grinstein, Science 319, 210 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Dimova, Electrodeformation, Electroporation, and Electrofusion of Cell-Sized Lipid Vesicles (CRC Press, 2010) pp. 97--122

  14. P. Galatola, Phys. Rev. E 72, 041930 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. H.N.W. Lekkerkerker, Physica A 159, 319 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. R.M. Thaokar, Eur. Phys. J. E 31, 315 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R.M. Thaokar, S.D. Deshmukh, Phys. Fluids 22, 034107 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. B. Duplantier, R.E. Goldstein, Victor Romero-Rochin, A.J. Pesci, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 508 (1990)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. H.K. Tsao, J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 10243 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. V. Kumaran, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 5490 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. V. Kumaran, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4996 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. A.W.C. Lau, P. Pincus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1338 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. J.W.S. Rayleigh, Philos. Mag. 184, 184 (1882)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. I. Hayati, A.J. Bailey, Th.F. Tadros, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 117, 205 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. N.V. Karsnow, S.I. Shevchenko, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 3623 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. A.P. Hume, L.R. Weatherley, J. Petera, Chem. Eng. J. 95, 171 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M.N. Tamashiro, H. Schiessel, Phys. Rev. E 74, 021412 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. J. Li, H. Zhang, F. Qie, Y. Yang, Jeff Z.Y. Chen, Soft Matter 11, 1788 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Winterhalter, W. Helfrich, J. Phys. Chem. 92, 6865 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rochish M. Thaokar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Priti Sinha, K., M. Thaokar, R. Conformation of charged vesicles: the Debye-Hückel and the low-curvature limit. Eur. Phys. J. E 39, 73 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2016-16073-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2016-16073-x

Keywords

Navigation