Abstract
In this paper, improved relations of total fuel energy, fuel gain, hot-spot radius and total areal density in a non-isobaric model of fuel assembly have been derived and compared with the numerical results of [J. Schmitt, J.W. Bates, S.P. Obenschain, S.T. Zalesak, D.E. Fyfe, Phys. Plasmas 17, 042701 (2010); S. Atzeni, A. Marocchino, A. Schiavi, G. Schurtz, New J. Phys. 15, 045004 (2013)] and several simulations performed by MULTI-1D radiation hydrodynamic code for shock ignition scenario. Our calculations indicate that the approximations made by [M.D. Rosen, J.D. Lindl, A.R. Thiessen, LLNL Laser Program Annual Report, UCRL-50021-83, pp. 3–5 (1983); J. Schmitt, J.W. Bates, S.P. Obenschain, S.T. Zalesak, D.E. Fyfe, Phys. Plasmas 17, 042701 (2010)] for the calculation of burn-up fraction are not accurate enough to give results consistent with simulations. Therefore, we have introduced more appropriate approximations for the burn-up fraction and total areal density of the fuel that are in more agreement with simulation results of shock ignition. Meanwhile, it is shown that the related formulas of the non-isobaric model for total fuel energy, fuel gain and also hot-spot radius cannot determine the model parameters independently, but improved model choose a better selection and less restrictions on determination of the parameters for the non-isobaric model. Such derivations can be used in theoretical studies of the ignition conditions and burn-up fraction of the fuel in shock ignition scenario.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C.D. Zhou, R. Betti, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 50, 140 (2005)
R. Betti, C.D. Zhou, K.S. Anderson, L.J. Perkins, W. Theobald, A.A. Solodov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 155001 (2007)
M.D. Rosen, J.D. Lindl, A.R. Thiessen, LLNL Laser Program Annual Report, UCRL-50021-83, 1983, pp. 3–5
M.D. Rosen, Phys. Plasmas 6, 1690 (1999)
S. Eliezer, M. Murakami, J.M. Martinez Val, Laser Part. Beams 25, 585 (2007)
J. Meyer-ter-Vehn, Nucl. Fusion 22, 561 (1982)
R. Kidder, Nucl. Fusion 16, 405 (1976)
B. Canaud, M. Temporal, New J. Phys. 12, 043037 (2010)
A.J. Schmitt, J.W. Bates, S.P. Obenschain, S.T. Zalesak, D.E. Fyfe, Phys. Plasmas 17, 042701 (2010)
M. Lafon, X. Ribeyre, G. Schurtz, Phys. Plasmas 17, 052704 (2010)
S. Atzeni, A. Marocchino, A. Schiavi, G. Schurtz, New J. Phys. 15, 045004 (2013)
R. Ramis, R. Schmalz, J. Meyer-ter-Vehn, Comput. Phys. Commun. 49, 475 (1988)
S. Atzeni, Phys. Plasmas 8, 3316 (1999)
S. Atzeni, A. Schiavi, A. Marocchino, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 53, 035010 (2011)
L.J. Perkins, R. Betti, K.N. Lafortune, W.H. Williams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 045004 (2009)
S. Atzeni, A. Marocchino, A. Schiavi, Phys. Plasmas 19, 090702 (2012)
R. Ramis, MULTI-1D user’s manual – Version 2009, E.T.S.I. Aeronáuticos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2012)
A. Marocchino et al., Phys. Plasmas 20, 2702 (2013)
A. Marocchino, S. Atzeni, A. Schiavi, Phys. Plasmas 21, 012701 (2014)
R. Ramis, K. Eidmann, J. Meyer-ter-Vehn, S. Hulle, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 637 (2012)
S.A. Ghasemi, A.H. Farahbod, S. Sobhanian, AIP Adv. 4, 077130 (2014)
A.H. Farahbod, S.A. Ghasemi, Iranian J. Phys. Res. 12, 4 (2013)
S.A. Ghasemi, A.H. Farahbod, Iranian J. Phys. Res. 13, 4 (2013)
S.A. Ghasemi, A.H. Farahbod, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 58, 308 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Farahbod, A., Ghasemi, S., Jafari, M. et al. Improvement of non-isobaric model for shock ignition. Eur. Phys. J. D 68, 314 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2014-50353-6
Received:
Revised:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2014-50353-6