Skip to main content
Log in

Cat state, sub-Planck structure and weak measurement

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal D Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heisenberg-limited and weak measurements are the two intriguing notions, used in recent times for enhancing the sensitivity of measurements in quantum metrology. Using a quantum cat state, endowed with sub-Planck structure, we connect these two novel concepts. It is demonstrated that these two phenomena manifest in complementary regimes, depending upon the degree of overlap between the mesoscopic states constituting the cat state under consideration. In particular, we find that when sub-Planck structure manifests, the imaginary weak value is obscured and vice versa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W.H. Zurek, Nature 412, 712 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Aharonov, D.Z. Albert, L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1351 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. W. Schleich, J.A. Wheeler, Nature 326, 574 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. W. Schleich, J.A. Wheeler, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4, 1715 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. W. Schleich, D.F. Walls, J.A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. A 38, 1177 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. W.P. Schleich, Quantum Optics Phase Space (Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 2001) and references therein

  7. W. Vogel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1849 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. F. Toscano, D.A.R. Dalvit, L. Davidovich, W.H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. A 73, 023803 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Praxmeyer, P. Wasylczyk, C. Radzewicz, K. Wodkiewicz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 063901 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Ghosh, A. Chiruvelli, J. Banerji, P.K. Panigrahi, Phys. Rev. A 73, 013411 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Banerji, S. Ghosh, J. Phys. B 39, 1113 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. U. Roy, S. Ghosh, P.K. Panigrahi, D. Vitali, Phys. Rev. A 80, 052115 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Banerji, Contemp. Phys. 48, 157 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. J.R. Bhatt, P.K. Panigrahi, M. Vyas, Phys. Rev. A 78, 034101 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Ghosh, U. Roy, C. Genes, D. Vitali, Phys. Rev. A 79, 052104 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. E.I. Jafarov, J. Van der Jeugt, Phys. Lett. A 374, 3400 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. P.K. Panigrahi, A. Kumar, U. Roy, S. Ghosh, AIP Conf. Proc. 1384, 84 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Ghosh, Int. J. Quant. Inf. 10, 1250014 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. G.S. Agarwal, P.K. Pathak, Phys. Rev. A 70, 053813 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. D.F. Walls, G.J. Milburn, Quantum Optics, 2nd edn. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008)

  21. I.M. Duck, P.M. Stevenson, E.C.G. Sudarshan, Phys. Rev. D 40, 2112 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Y. Aharonov, L. Vaidman, J. Phys. A 24, 2315 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. G. Mitchison, R. Jozsa, S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. A 76, 060302 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Tollaksen, J. Phys. A 40, 9033 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. R. Jozsa, Phys. Rev. A 76, 044103 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. N. Brunner, C. Simon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 010405 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. D.J. Starling et al., Phys. Rev. A 82, 011802(R) (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. T. Geszti, Phys. Rev. A 81, 044102 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. S. Wu, Y. Li, Phys. Rev. A 83, 052106 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. X. Zhu et al., Phys. Rev. A 84, 052111 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. T. Koike, S. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. A 84, 062106 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. A.D. Parks, J.E. Gray, Phys. Rev. A 84, 012116 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. K. Nakamura, A. Nishizawa, M.K. Fujimoto, Phys. Rev. A 85, 012113 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. J. Dressel, A.N. Jordan, Phys. Rev. A 85, 012107 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Y. Susa, Y. Shikano, A. Hosoya, Phys. Rev. A 85, 052110 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. A. Di Lorenzo, Phys. Rev. A 85, 032106 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. S. Wu, M. Zukowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 080403 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. A. Matzkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 150407 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. A.K. Pan, A. Matzkin, Phys. Rev. A 85, 022122 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. A.K. Pan, A. Matzkin, Laser Phys. 22, 1 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. N.W.M. Ritchie, J.G. Story, R.G. Hulet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1107 (1991)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. G.L. Pryde et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 220405 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Q. Wang et al., Phys. Rev. A 73, 023814 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. O. Hosten, P. Kwiat, Science 319, 787 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. K. Yokota, T. Yamamoto, M. Koashi, N. Imoto, New J. Phys. 11, 033011 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. D.J. Starling, P.B. Dixon, A.N. Jordan, J.C. Howell, Phys. Rev. A 80, 041803(R) (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. J.S. Lundeen, A.M. Steinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 020404 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. A.P. Lund, H.M. Wiseman, New J. Phys. 12, 093011 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. O. Zilberberg, A. Romito, Y. Gefen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 080405 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. J.S. Lundeen et al., Nature 474, 188 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. D.J. Starling et al., Phys. Rev. A 82, 011802(R) (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. L. Vaidman, Found. Phys. 26, 895 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Y. Aharonov et al., Phys. Lett. A 301, 130 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. R.E. George et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 3777 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. A. Matzkin, A.K. Pan, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46, 315307 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. S. Kocsis et al., Science 332, 117 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Y.S. Kim, J.C. Lee, O. Kwon, Y.H. Kim, Nat. Phys. 8, 117 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. D. Home, A.K. Pan, Md.M. Ali, A.S. Majumdar, J. Phys. A 40, 13975 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. D. Home, A.K. Pan, J. Phys. A 42, 165302 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. D. Home, A.K. Pan, A. Banerjee, Eur. Phys. J. D 67, 72 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alok Kumar Pan or Prasanta Kumar Panigrahi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pan, A.K., Panigrahi, P.K. Cat state, sub-Planck structure and weak measurement. Eur. Phys. J. D 67, 182 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2013-30592-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2013-30592-9

Keywords

Navigation