Abstract.
Evolution of the helium atom in a strong time-dependent (TD) magnetic field (B) of strength up to 1011 G is investigated through a quantum fluid dynamics (QFD) based current-density functional theory (CDFT). The TD-QFD-CDFT computations are performed through numerical solution of a single generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation employing vector exchange-correlation potentials and scalar exchange-correlation density functionals that depend both on the electronic charge-density and the current-density. The results are compared with that obtained from a B-TD-QFD-DFT approach (based on conventional TD-DFT) under similar numerical constraints but employing only scalar exchange-correlation potential dependent on electronic charge-density only. The B-TD-QFD-DFT approach, at a particular TD magnetic field-strength, yields electronic charge- and current-densities as well as exchange-correlation potential resembling with that obtained from the time-independent studies involving static (time-independent) magnetic fields. However, TD-QFD-CDFT electronic charge- and current-densities along with the exchange-correlation potential and energy differ significantly from that obtained using B-TD-QFD-DFT approach, particularly at field-strengths >109 G, representing dynamical effects of a TD field. The work concludes that when a helium atom is subjected to a strong TD magnetic field of order >109 G, the conventional TD-DFT based approach differs “dynamically” from the CDFT based approach under similar computational constraints.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C.A. Ullirich, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 234108 (2006)
J. Tao, G. Vignale, I.V. Tokatly, Phys. Rev. B 76, 195126 (2007)
N.T. Maitra, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 234104 (2005)
D.J. Tozer, N.C. Handy, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2, 2117 (2000)
M. Thiele, S. Kümmel, Phys. Rev. A 79, 052503 (2009)
G. Wunner, H. Herold, F. Geyer, Atoms in Strong Magnetic Fields (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994)
V. Canuto, D.C. Kelly, Astrophys. Space Sci. 17, 277 (1972)
R.J. Henry, R.F. O’Connell, E.R. Smith, G. Chanmugam, A.K. Rajagopal, Phys. Rev. D 9, 329 (1974)
R.O. Mueller, A.R.P. Rau, L. Spruch, Phys. Rev. A 11, 789 (1975)
D.M. Larsen, Phys. Rev. B 20, 5217 (1979)
E. Müller, Astron. Astrophys. 130, 415 (1984)
Y. Chen, B. Gil, H. Mathieu, Phys. Rev. B 34, 6912 (1986)
M. Vincke, D. Baye, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 22, 2089 (1989)
M. Hesse, D. Baye, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 37, 3937 (2004)
D. Baye, A.J. de ter Beerst, J.-M. Sparenberg, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42, 225102 (2009)
J. Virtamo, J. Phys. B 9, 751 (1976)
P. Proeschel, W. Roesner, G. Wunner, H. Ruder, H. Herold, J. Phys. B 15, 1959 (1982)
D. Lai, E.E. Salpeter, S.L. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. A 45, 4832 (1992)
G. Thurner, H. Korbel, M. Braun, H. Herold, H. Ruder, G. Wunner, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 26, 4719 (1993)
M.V. Ivanov, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 27, 4513 (1994)
M.D. Jones, G. Ortiz, D.M. Ceperley, Phys. Rev. A 54, 219 (1996)
Y.P. Kravchenko, M.A. Liberman, Phys. Rev. A 56, R2510 (1997)
M.D. Jones, G. Ortiz, D.M. Ceperley, Phys. Rev. A 59, 2875 (1999)
A. Thirumalai, J.S. Heyl, Phys. Rev. A 79, 012514 (2009)
W. Becken, P. Schmelcher, F.K. Diakonos, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 32, 1557 (1999)
W. Becken, P. Schmelcher, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 33, 545 (2000)
W. Becken, P. Schmelcher, Phys. Rev. A 63, 053412 (2001)
W. Becken, P. Schmelcher, Phys. Rev. A 65, 033416 (2002)
X. Wang, H. Qiao, Phys. Rev. A 77, 043414 (2008)
X. Wang, J. Zhao, H. Qiao, Phys. Rev. A 80, 053425 (2009)
B.M. Relovsky, H. Ruder, Phys. Rev. A 53, 4068 (1996)
M. Braun, Phys. Rev. A 65, 033415 (2002)
Z. Medin, D. Lai, Phys. Rev. A 74, 062507 (2006)
Vikas, B.M. Deb, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 97, 701 (2004)
R.J. Magyar, Phys. Rev. B 79, 195127 (2009)
H.C. Praddaude, Phys. Rev. A 6, 1321 (1972)
H. Friedrich, Phys. Rev. A 26, 1827 (1982)
M.V. Ivanov, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 21, 447 (1988)
R. Cohen, J. Lodenquai, M. Ruderman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 467 (1970)
G. Ortiz, M.D. Jones, D.M. Ceperley, Phys. Rev. A 52, R3405 (1995)
M.D. Jones, G. Ortiz, D.M. Ceperley, Phys. Rev. E 55, 6202 (1997)
D. Lai, E.E. Salpeter, Phys. Rev. A 53, 152 (1996)
O.-A. Al-Hujaj, P. Schmelcher, Phys. Rev. A 67, 023403 (2003)
Vikas, Chem. Phys. Lett. 413, 216 (2005)
Vikas, Chem. Phys. Lett. 458, 214 (2008)
Vikas, Int. J. Quantum Chem. (2010) DOI: 10.1002/qua.22516
Vikas, Int. J. Quantum Chem. (2010) DOI: 10.1002/qua.22784
J. Tao, G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. B 74, 193108 (2006)
N. Helbig, S. Kurth, S. Pittalis, E. Räsänen, E.K.U. Gross, Phys. Rev. B 77, 245106 (2008)
R. D’Agosta, M. Di Ventra, G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. B 76, 035320 (2007)
S.K. Ghosh, A.K. Dhara, Phys. Rev. A 38, 1149 (1988)
C.A. Ullrich, G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. B 65, 245102 (2002)
G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. B 70, 201102(R) (2004)
P. Romaniello, P.L. de Boeij, Phys. Rev. B 71, 155108 (2005)
U. von Barth, N.E. Dahlen, R. van Leeuwen, G. Stefanucci, Phys. Rev. B 72, 235109 (2005)
M. Dion, K. Burke, Phys. Rev. A 72, 020502(R) (2005)
R. D’Agosta, G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 016405 (2006)
R. D’Agosta, M. Di Ventra, Phys. Rev. B 78, 165105 (2008)
V.U. Nazarov, J.M. Pitarke, Y. Takada, G. Vignale, Y.-C. Chang, Phys. Rev. B 76, 205103 (2007)
G. Xianlong, M. Polini, D. Rainis, M.P. Tosi, G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 206402 (2008)
M. van Faassen, P.L. de Boeij, R. van Leeuwen, J.A. Berger, J.G. Snijders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 186401 (2002)
B.M. Deb, S.K. Ghosh, J. Chem. Phys. 77, 342 (1982)
S.K. Ghosh, B.M. Deb, Phys. Rep. 92, 1 (1982)
S.K. Ghosh, B.M. Deb, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 22, 871 (1982)
B.M. Deb, S.K. Ghosh, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 23, 1 (1983)
B.M. Deb, P.K. Chattaraj, Phys. Rev. A 37, 4030 (1988)
B.M. Deb, P.K. Chattaraj, Phys. Rev. A 39, 1696 (1989)
B.K. Dey, B.M. Deb, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 6229 (1999)
Vikas, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 107, 647 (2007)
G. Vignale, M. Rasolt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2360 (1987)
G. Vignale, M. Rasolt, Phys. Rev. B 37, 10685 (1988)
S.M. Colwell, N.C. Handy, A.M. Lee, Phys. Rev. A 53, 1316 (1996)
A. Holas, N.H. March, Phys. Rev. A 56, 4595 (1997)
A.M. Lee, N.C. Handy, Phys. Rev. A 59, 209 (1999)
K. Higuchi, M. Higuchi, Phys. Rev. B 74, 195122 (2006)
M. Higuchi, K. Higuchi, Phys. Rev. B 75, 195114 (2007)
J. Tao, J.P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 196403 (2005)
S.K. Ghosh, B.M. Deb, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 27, 381 (1994)
S.X. Hu, W.X. Qu, Z.Z. Xu, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 31, 1523 (1998)
J.L. Krause, K.J. Schafer, K.C. Kulander, Phys. Rev. A 45, 4998 (1992)
P. Schmelcher, M.V. Ivanov, W. Becken, Phys. Rev. A 59, 3424 (1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vikas Quantum fluid dynamics based current-density functional study of a helium atom in a strong time-dependent magnetic field. Eur. Phys. J. D 61, 551–561 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2010-10390-9
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2010-10390-9