Skip to main content
Log in

Constructing entanglement witness via real skew-symmetric operators

  • Quantum Information
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal D Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, new types of EWs are introduced. They are constructed by using real skew-symmetric operators defined on a single party subsystem of a bipartite d⊗d system and a maximal entangled state in that system. A canonical form for these witnesses is proposed which is called canonical EW in corresponding to canonical real skew-symmetric operator. Also for each possible partition of the canonical real skew-symmetric operator corresponding EW is obtained. The method used for d⊗d case is extended to d1⊗d2 systems. It is shown that there exist Cd2 d1 distinct possibilities to construct EWs for a given d1⊗ d2 Hilbert space. The optimality and nd-optimality problem is studied for each type of EWs. In each step, a large class of quantum PPT states is introduced. It is shown that among them there exist entangled PPT states which are detected by the constructed witnesses. Also the idea of canonical EWs is extended to obtain other EWs with greater PPT entanglement detection power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M.A. Nielsen, I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. The Physics of Quantum Information: Quantum Cryptography, Quantum Teleportation and Quantum Computation, edited by D. Bouwmeester, A. Ekert, A. Zeilinger (Springer, New York, 2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Preskill, The Theory of Quantum Information and Quantum Computation (California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 2000), http://www.theory.caltech.edu/poeole/preskill/ph229/

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 232, 333 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, R. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5239 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, R. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 223, 1 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. B.M. Terhal, Phys. Lett. A 271, 319 (2000); B.M. Terhal, Linear Algebr. Appl. 323, 61 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. S.L. Woronowicz, Rep. Math. Phys. 10, 165 (1976)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. M.A. Jafarizadeh, M. Rezaee, S.K.A.S. Yagoobi, Phys. Rev. A 72, 062106 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. M.A. Jafarizadeh, R. Sufiani, Phys. Rev. A 77, 012105 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. M.A. Jafarizadeh, G. Najarbashi, Y. Akbari, H. Habibian, Eur. Phys. J. D 47, 233 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. M.A. Jafarizadeh, Y. Akbari, N. Behzadi, Eur. Phys. J. D 47, 283 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Lewenstein, B. Kraus, P. Horodecki, J.I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A 63, 04430 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. A.C. Doherty, P.A. Parrilo, F.M. Spedalieri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 187904 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. A.C. Doherty, P.A. Parrilo, F.M. Spedalieri, Phys. Rev. A 69, 022308 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Yu, N. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 150504 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. H.P. Breuer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 080501 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. M.A. Jafarizadeh, M. Rezaee, S. Ahadpour, Phys. Rev. A 74, 042335 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. D. Chruściński, A. Kossakowski (2007) arXiv: quant-ph/0712.111

  21. R.A. Bertlmann, P. Krammer, Phys. Rev. A 77, 024303 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. C.C. Macduffee, The Theory of Matrices (Chelsea Publishing Company, New York 1, N. Y., 1946)

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Jamiokowski, Rep. Math. Phys. 3, 275 (1972)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Lewenstein, B. Kraus, J.I. Cirac, P. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. A 62, 052310 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. A 59, 4206 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. W. Hall (2006) arXiv: quant-ph/0607035

  27. M.B. Nathanson, Elementary Methods in Number Theory (Springer-Verlag, New york, Berlin Heidelberg, 2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. M.A. Jafarizadeh, G. Najarbashi, H. Habibian, Phys. Rev. A 75, 052326 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Curty, M. Lewenstein, N. Lütkenhaus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 217903 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Curty, O. Gühne, M. Lewenstein, N. Lütkenhaus, Phys. Rev. A 71, 022306 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Jafarizadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jafarizadeh, M., Behzadi, N. Constructing entanglement witness via real skew-symmetric operators. Eur. Phys. J. D 55, 729–744 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2009-00264-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2009-00264-8

PACS

Navigation