Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamical selection rules from \(p \bar p\) annihilation at restin three meson final states

  • experimental physics
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal C - Particles and Fields Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

The hadronic annihilation branching-ratios in quasi-two-body final states have been obtained from the observation of the reactions \(\bar p p\) \(\rightarrow \) \(\pi^ + \pi^- \pi^0\), \(K^ + K^- \pi^0,K^\pm \pi^\mp K^0\) at rest in hydrogen targets at different densities. The enhancement or suppression of specific hadronic channels connected to dynamical selection rules is observed in the production of different resonances both in protonium S and P-waves, systematically investigated for the first time. Besides the well known \(\rho(770) \pi\) and \(a_2(1320) \pi\) enhancement from 3 S 1 and 1 S 0 partial waves, the dominance of one isospin source in \(K^*(892) \bar K\) production, well established from S-waves, is confirmed also in P-waves (1 S 0, I = 0; 3 S 1, I = 1; 1 P 1, I = 0; 3 P 1, I = 0; 3 P 2, I = 1). In addition, the experimental data clearly show a strong suppression of \(\phi(1020) \pi\) and \(a_0(980) \pi\) final states from P-wave which has a remarkable coincidence with \(K^*(892) \bar K\) pattern production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Okubo, Phys. Lett. B 5, 165 1963; G. Zweig, CERN Report no. 8419/th 412 (1964); I. Izuka, Prog. Theor. Phys. (suppl 37) 38 21 (1966)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. C.B. Dover, T. Gutsche, M. Maruyama, A. Faessler Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.29, 87 1992

  3. M. Bargiotti et al. , Eur. Phys. Jour. C 26, 371 2003; Phys. Lett. B5612332003

  4. M. Bargiotti et al. , EPJdirect A 2, 1 2002

  5. Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D 66, 010001 2002

    Google Scholar 

  6. C.J. Batty, Nucl. Phys. A 601, 425 1996

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Salvini, G. Bendiscioli, A. Fontana, P. Montagna, Nucl. Phys. A 696, 527 2001

    Google Scholar 

  8. V.G. Ableev et al. , Phys. Lett. B 329, 407 1994

  9. M. Doser et al. , Nucl. Phys. A 486, 493 1988

  10. M. Bargiotti et al. , Phys. Rev. D 25, 12001 2002

  11. M. Agnello et al. , Phys. Lett. B 337, 226 1994

  12. C. Amsler et al. , Phys. Lett. B 297, 214 1992

  13. M. Bargiotti et al. , Phys. Rev. D 65, 0120011 2002

  14. A. Zoccoli, Yad. Fiz. 59 1448 (1996)

  15. C. Amsler et al. , Z. Phys. C 58, 175 1993

  16. L. Adiels et al. , Z. Phys. C 42, 49 1989

  17. C. Amsler et al. , Z. Phys. C 58, 175 1987

  18. A. Bertin et al. , Phys. Lett. B 386, 486 1996

  19. M. Doser et al. , Phys. Lett. B 215, 792 1988

  20. A. Bertin et al. , Phys. Lett. B 385, 493 1996

  21. V. Alberico et al. , Phys. Lett. B 438, 430 1998

  22. P. Salvini et al. , submitted to Eur. Phys. Jour. C, 2003

  23. M. Doser et al. , Phys. Lett. B 215, 792 1988

  24. G. Bendiscioli et al. ,Nucl. Phys. A 686, 317 2001

    Google Scholar 

  25. U. Gastaldi et al. ,Phys. Lett. B 320, 193 1994

    Google Scholar 

  26. C. Amsler et al. , Phys. Lett. B 355, 425 1995

  27. A. Abele et al. , Phys. Rev. D 57, 3860 1998

  28. M.G.Sapozhnikov, Phys. of Atomic Nuclei 62, 1987 1999

  29. A. Bertin et al. , Phys. Lett. B 410, 344 1997

  30. A. Abele et al. , Eur. Phys. Jour. C 17, 583 2000

  31. C. Amsler et al. , Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 1293 1998

  32. J. Reifenrother et al. , Phys. Lett. B 267, 299 1991

  33. V.G. Ableev et al. , Nucl. Phys. A 594, 375 1995

  34. V. Alberico et al. , Phys. Lett. B 432, 427 1998

  35. A. Bertin et al. , Phys. Lett. B 434, 180 1998

  36. PhD. Thesis of M. Heinzelmann (1996)

  37. B. Conforto et al. , Nucl. Phys. B 3, 495 1967

  38. A. Abele et al. , Phys. Rev. D 57, 3860 1998

  39. B. May Z. Phys. C 46, 191 1990

  40. Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 66, 010001-754 2002

    Google Scholar 

  41. M. Alford, R.L. Jaffe hep-lat/0001023; hep-lat/0306037

  42. A. Filippi et al. , Phys. Lett. B 495, 284 2000; Nucl. Phys. A6922872001

  43. E. Klempt, Phys. of Atomic Nuclei 57, 1565 1994

    Google Scholar 

  44. V.E. Markushin, Nucl. Phys. A655, 185 1999; D. Buzatu, F.M. Lev, Phys. Part. Nucl. 29, 88 1998; A.V. Anisovich, E. Klempt, Z. Phys. A 354, 197 1996; M.P. Locher, Yang Lu, Z. Phys. A 351, 83 1995

  45. M. Foster et al. , Nucl. Phys. B 6, 107 1968

  46. A. Bertin et al. , Phys. Lett. B 408, 476 1997

  47. A. Abele et al. , Phys. Lett. B 385, 425 1996

  48. E. Klempt et al. , Z. Phys. A 354, 67 1996

  49. R. Armenteros et al. CERN-PRE-86-053

  50. P. Espigat et al. , Nucl. Phys. B 36, 93 1972

Download references

Author information

Consortia

Additional information

Received: 4 February 2004, Published online: 5 May 2004

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

The OBELIX Collaboration. Dynamical selection rules from \(p \bar p\) annihilation at restin three meson final states. Eur. Phys. J. C 35, 177–187 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s2004-01812-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s2004-01812-7

Keywords

Navigation