Abstract
We calculate the contributions to electroweak precision observables (EWPOs) due to a fourth generation of fermions with the most general (quark-) flavour structure (but assuming Dirac neutrinos and a trivial flavour structure in the lepton sector). The new-physics contributions to the EWPOs are calculated at one-loop order using automated tools (FeynArts/FormCalc). No further approximations are made in our calculation. We discuss the size of non-oblique contributions arising from Z–quark–anti-quark vertex corrections and the dependence of the EWPOs on all CKM mixing angles involving the fourth generation. We find that the electroweak precision observables are sensitive to two of the fourth-generation mixing angles and that the corresponding constraints on these angles are competitive with those obtained from flavour physics. For non-trivial 4×4 flavour structures, the non-oblique contributions lead to relative corrections of several permille and should be included in a global fit.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
If the first two assumptions are still valid, the case of new physics near the electroweak scale can be handled by introducing three additional oblique parameters. This was discussed in [38].
The branching fraction R c and asymmetry factor \(\mathcal {A}_{c}\) for the charm quark also receive non-oblique corrections, but these observables are less constraining due to their larger experimental error.
These are independent SM3 input parameters in the on-shell renormalisation scheme [70], which is the scheme we used in our calculations.
If α(M Z ), M Z and M W are the same in the SM3 and SM4, the new physics only enters at one-loop order. In the next section we deal with the case where a different value of M W is chosen in the two models.
See e.g. [71] for a detailed description.
References
G.C. Branco, L. Lavoura, Nucl. Phys. B 278, 738 (1986)
P.H. Frampton, P. Hung, M. Sher, Phys. Rep. 330, 263 (2000). arXiv:hep-ph/9903387 [hep-ph]
F. del Aguila, M. Perez-Victoria, J. Santiago, J. High Energy Phys. 09, 011 (2000). arXiv:hep-ph/0007316
G. Barenboim, F. Botella, O. Vives, Nucl. Phys. B 613, 285 (2001). arXiv:hep-ph/0105306 [hep-ph]
B. Holdom, Phys. Rev. D 54, 721 (1996). arXiv:hep-ph/9602248
M. Maltoni, V. Novikov, L. Okun, A.N. Rozanov, M. Vysotsky, Phys. Lett. B 476, 107 (2000). arXiv:hep-ph/9911535 [hep-ph]
H.-J. He, N. Polonsky, S.-f. Su, Phys. Rev. D 64, 053004 (2001). arXiv:hep-ph/0102144 [hep-ph]
V. Novikov, L. Okun, A.N. Rozanov, M. Vysotsky, Phys. Lett. B 529, 111 (2002). arXiv:hep-ph/0111028 [hep-ph]
V. Novikov, L. Okun, A.N. Rozanov, M. Vysotsky, JETP Lett. 76, 127 (2002). arXiv:hep-ph/0203132 [hep-ph]
G.D. Kribs, T. Plehn, M. Spannowsky, T.M. Tait, Phys. Rev. D 76, 075016 (2007). arXiv:0706.3718 [hep-ph]
V.A. Novikov, A.N. Rozanov, M.I. Vysotsky, Phys. At. Nucl. 73, 636 (2010). arXiv:0904.4570 [hep-ph]
B. Holdom et al., PMC Phys. A 3, 4 (2009). arXiv:0904.4698 [hep-ph]
J. Alwall et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 49, 791 (2007). arXiv:hep-ph/0607115
M. Bobrowski, A. Lenz, J. Riedl, J. Rohrwild, Phys. Rev. D 79, 113006 (2009). arXiv:0902.4883 [hep-ph]
M.S. Chanowitz, Phys. Rev. D 79, 113008 (2009). arXiv:0904.3570 [hep-ph]
W.-S. Hou, Y.-Y. Mao, C.-H. Shen, Phys. Rev. D 82, 036005 (2010). arXiv:1003.4361 [hep-ph]
O. Eberhardt, A. Lenz, J. Rohrwild, Phys. Rev. D 82, 095006 (2010). arXiv:1005.3505 [hep-ph]
W.-S. Hou, M. Nagashima, A. Soddu, Phys. Rev. D 76, 016004 (2007). arXiv:hep-ph/0610385 [hep-ph]
A. Soni, A.K. Alok, A. Giri, R. Mohanta, S. Nandi, Phys. Lett. B 683, 302 (2010). arXiv:0807.1971 [hep-ph]
A. Soni, A.K. Alok, A. Giri, R. Mohanta, S. Nandi, Phys. Rev. D 82, 033009 (2010). arXiv:1002.0595 [hep-ph]
A.J. Buras, B. Duling, T. Feldmann, T. Heidsieck, C. Promberger et al., J. High Energy Phys. 1009, 106 (2010). arXiv:1002.2126 [hep-ph]
A.J. Buras, B. Duling, T. Feldmann, T. Heidsieck, C. Promberger, J. High Energy Phys. 1009, 104 (2010). arXiv:1006.5356 [hep-ph]
H. Lacker, A. Menzel, J. High Energy Phys. 1007, 006 (2010). arXiv:1003.4532 [hep-ph]
J. Erler, P. Langacker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 031801 (2010). arXiv:1003.3211 [hep-ph]
Search for t’ pair production in lepton+jets channel. CMS Physics Analysis Summary, CMS-PAS-EXO-11-051 (2011)
Search for a heavy bottom-like quark in 1:14 fb of pp collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 7~\mathrm{TeV}\). CMS Physics Analysis Summary, CMS-PAS-EXO-11-036 (2011)
X. Ruan, Z. Zhang (2011). arXiv:1105.1634 [hep-ph]
J.F. Gunion, (2011). arXiv:1105.3965 [hep-ph]
K. Belotsky, D. Fargion, M. Khlopov, R. Konoplich, K. Shibaev, Phys. Rev. D 68, 054027 (2003). arXiv:hep-ph/0210153 [hep-ph]
A. Rozanov, M. Vysotsky, Phys. Lett. B 700, 313 (2011). arXiv:1012.1483 [hep-ph]
W.-Y. Keung, P. Schwaller, J. High Energy Phys. 1106, 054 (2011). arXiv:1103.3765 [hep-ph]
S. Cetin, T. Cuhadar-Donszelmann, M. Sahin, S. Sultansoy, G. Unel (2011). arXiv:1108.4071 [hep-ph]
L.M. Carpenter (2011). arXiv:1110.4895 [hep-ph]
M.S. Chanowitz, Phys. Rev. D 035018 (2010). arXiv:1007.0043 [hep-ph]
S. Nandi, A. Soni (2010). arXiv:1011.6091 [hep-ph]
A.K. Alok, A. Dighe, D. London (2010). arXiv:1011.2634 [hep-ph]
M.E. Peskin, T. Takeuchi, Phys. Rev. D 46, 381 (1992).
I. Maksymyk, C.P. Burgess, D. London, Phys. Rev. D 50, 529 (1994). arXiv:hep-ph/9306267
D.Y. Bardin et al., Comput. Phys. Commun. 133, 229 (2001). arXiv:hep-ph/9908433. http://www-zeuthen.desy.de/theory/research/zfitter/index.html
A.B. Arbuzov et al., Comput. Phys. Commun. 174, 728 (2006). arXiv:hep-ph/0507146
T. Hahn, M. Rauch, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 157, 236 (2006). arXiv:hep-ph/0601248
T. Hahn, Comput. Phys. Commun. 140, 418 (2001). arXiv:hep-ph/0012260
T. Hahn, M. Perez-Victoria, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118, 153 (1999). arXiv:hep-ph/9807565
(2010). arXiv:1012.2367 [hep-ex]
K. Nakamura et al., Particle Data Group. J. Phys. G 37, 075021 (2010)
G. Degrassi, P. Gambino, A. Vicini, Phys. Lett. B 383, 219 (1996). arXiv:hep-ph/9603374 [hep-ph]
G. Degrassi, P. Gambino, Nucl. Phys. B 567, 3 (2000). arXiv:hep-ph/9905472 [hep-ph]
A. Freitas, W. Hollik, W. Walter, G. Weiglein, Phys. Lett. B 495, 338 (2000). arXiv:hep-ph/0007091 [hep-ph]
A. Freitas, W. Hollik, W. Walter, G. Weiglein, Nucl. Phys. B 632, 189 (2002). arXiv:hep-ph/0202131 [hep-ph]
M. Awramik, M. Czakon, Phys. Lett. B 568, 48 (2003). arXiv:hep-ph/0305248 [hep-ph]
M. Awramik, M. Czakon, A. Onishchenko, O. Veretin, Phys. Rev. D 68, 053004 (2003). arXiv:hep-ph/0209084 [hep-ph]
K. Chetyrkin, J.H. Kuhn, M. Steinhauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3394 (1995). arXiv:hep-ph/9504413 [hep-ph]
K. Chetyrkin, J.H. Kuhn, M. Steinhauser, Nucl. Phys. B 482, 213 (1996). arXiv:hep-ph/9606230 [hep-ph]
M. Faisst, J.H. Kuhn, T. Seidensticker, O. Veretin, Nucl. Phys. B 665, 649 (2003). arXiv:hep-ph/0302275 [hep-ph]
M. Awramik, M. Czakon, A. Freitas, G. Weiglein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 201805 (2004). arXiv:hep-ph/0407317 [hep-ph]
R. Barbieri, M. Beccaria, P. Ciafaloni, G. Curci, A. Vicere, Phys. Lett. B 288, 95 (1992). arXiv:hep-ph/9205238 [hep-ph]
R. Barbieri, M. Beccaria, P. Ciafaloni, G. Curci, A. Vicere, Nucl. Phys. B 409, 105 (1993)
J. Fleischer, O. Tarasov, F. Jegerlehner, Phys. Rev. D 51, 3820 (1995)
G. Degrassi, P. Gambino, A. Sirlin, Phys. Lett. B 394, 188 (1997). arXiv:hep-ph/9611363 [hep-ph]
A. Djouadi, C. Verzegnassi, Phys. Lett. B 195, 265 (1987)
B.A. Kniehl, Nucl. Phys. B 347, 86 (1990)
F. Halzen, B.A. Kniehl, Nucl. Phys. B 353, 567 (1991)
B.A. Kniehl, A. Sirlin, Nucl. Phys. B 371, 141 (1992)
B.A. Kniehl, A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. D 47, 883 (1993)
A. Djouadi, P. Gambino, Phys. Rev. D 49, 3499 (1994). arXiv:hep-ph/9309298 [hep-ph]
G. Montagna, O. Nicrosini, F. Piccinini, G. Passarino, Comput. Phys. Commun. 117, 278 (1999). arXiv:hep-ph/9804211
D. Bardin et al., in Reports of the Working Group on Precision Calculations for the Z Resonance, Workshop Group on Precision Calculations for the Z Resonance, Geneva, Switzerland, 14 Jan 1994, CERN 95-03 (1994), pp. 7–162
A. Czarnecki, J.H. Kuhn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3955 (1996). arXiv:hep-ph/9608366
R. Harlander, T. Seidensticker, M. Steinhauser, Phys. Lett. B 426, 125 (1998). arXiv:hep-ph/9712228
M. Bohm, H. Spiesberger, W. Hollik, Fortschr. Phys. 34, 687 (1986)
M. Böhm, A. Denner, H. Joos, Gauge Theories of the Strong and Electroweak Interaction (Teubner, Leipzig, 2001)
A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. D 22, 971 (1980)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Alexander Lenz and Ulrich Nierste for fruitful discussions and thorough proof reading.
J.R. is supported by DFG Sonderforschungsbereich SFB/TR 9 “Computergestützte Theoretische Teilchenphysik”. P.G. is supported by DFG SFB/TR9. M.W. is partially supported by project DFG NI 1105/2-1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A: Parametrisation of the CKM matrix
Appendix A: Parametrisation of the CKM matrix
The CKM matrix of the SM3 depends on three mixing angles θ 12, θ 13 and θ 23 and one complex phase δ 13. Its elements are given by
where c ij =cosθ ij and s ij =sinθ ij . The SM4 CKM matrix is parametrised by three additional mixing angles θ 14, θ 24 and θ 34 and two additional phases δ 14 and δ 24. In terms of these parameters, it is then written as
with
For θ 14=θ 24=θ 34=δ 14=δ 24=0 the SM4 CKM matrix assumes block-diagonal form with the SM3 CKM matrix in the first 3×3 block:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
González, P., Rohrwild, J. & Wiebusch, M. Electroweak precision observables in a fourth generation model with general flavour structure. Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2007 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2007-0
Received:
Revised:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2007-0