Skip to main content
Log in

A maximum entropy model for opinions in social groups

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study how the opinions of a group of individuals determine their spatial distribution and connectivity, through an agent-based model. The interaction between agents is described by a Hamiltonian in which agents are allowed to move freely without an underlying lattice (the average network topology connecting them is determined from the parameters). This kind of model was derived using maximum entropy statistical inference under fixed expectation values of certain probabilities that (we propose) are relevant to social organization. Control parameters emerge as Lagrange multipliers of the maximum entropy problem, and they can be associated with the level of consequence between the personal beliefs and external opinions, and the tendency to socialize with peers of similar or opposing views. These parameters define a phase diagram for the social system, which we studied using Monte Carlo Metropolis simulations. Our model presents both first and second-order phase transitions, depending on the ratio between the internal consequence and the interaction with others. We have found a critical value for the level of internal consequence, below which the personal beliefs of the agents seem to be irrelevant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Ball, Physica A 314, 1 (2002)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. C. Castellano, S. Fortunato, V. Loreto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 591 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Sznajd-Weron, J. Sznajd, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 11, 1157 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. L. Sabatelli, P. Richmond, Physica A 334, 274 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Wang, L.P. Chi, X. Cai, Chin. Phys. Lett. 25, 1502 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Axelrod, J. Conflict Resol. 41, 203 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C. Castellano, M. Marsili, A. Vespignani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3536 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Kacperski, J.A. Holyst, Physica A 269, 511 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Z. Liu, J. Luo, C. Shao, Phys. Rev. E 64, 046134 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Schulze, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 16, 351 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. H.-B. Hu, X.-F. Wang, J. Phys. A 42, 225005 (2009)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Fronczak, A. Fronczak, J.A. Holyst, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 17, 1227 (2006)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Ausloos, F. Petroni, Europhys. Lett. 77, 38002 (2007)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Ausloos, F. Petroni, Physica A 388, 4438 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Klemm, V.M. Eguíluz, R. Toral, M.S. Miguel, Phys. Rev. E 67, 026120 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. K. Klemm, V.M. Eguíluz, R. Toral, M.S. Miguel, Phys. Rev. E 67, 045101 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. P. Fronczak, A. Fronczak, J.A. Holyst, Eur. Phys. J. B 59, 133 (2007)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. C. Biely, R. Hanel, S. Thurner, Eur. Phys. J. B 67, 285 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. B. Kozma, A. Barrat, Phys. Rev. E 77, 016102 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. I.J. Benczik, S.Z. Benczik, B. Schmittmann, R.K.P. Zia, Phys. Rev. E 79, 046104 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. E.T. Jaynes, Phys. Rev. 106, 620 (1957)

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. F.Y. Wu, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 235 (1982)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. E.T. Jaynes, Probability Theory: The Logic of Science (Cambridge University Press, 2003)

  24. D.P. Landau, K. Binder, A guide to Monte Carlo simulations in statistical physics (Cambridge University Press, 2005)

  25. D.H.E. Gross, E.V. Votyakov, Eur. Phys. J. B 15, 115 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. M.A. Carignano, Chem. Phys. Lett. 361, 291 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. P. Chomaz, F. Gulminelli, Nucl. Phys. A 647, 153 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. P. Chomaz, F. Gulminelli, Eur. Phys. J. A 30, 317 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio Davis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davis, S., Navarrete, Y. & Gutiérrez, G. A maximum entropy model for opinions in social groups. Eur. Phys. J. B 87, 78 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2014-40918-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2014-40918-6

Keywords

Navigation