Abstract.
Recently, we have presented the first exhaustive analysis of the world-wide airport network. Two important results of that study are that: (i) the world-wide airport network is a small-world network with power-law decaying degree and betweenness centrality distributions; (ii) the most connected cities (largest degree) are typically not the most central cities (largest betweenness centrality). This second finding is particularly significant because of results demonstrating that nodes with high betweenness tend to play a more important role in keeping networks connected than those with high degree. Here, we investigate if current network models can explain this finding and we show that they cannot. Thus, we propose a new model that explains this behavior in terms of the geo-political constraints that affect the growth of the airport network. We further hypothesize that in other infrastructures, affected by similar geo-political constraints, critical locations might not coincide with highly-connected hubs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Bisseur, F. Alamdari, Transportation 25, 331 (1998)
L.P. Dana, D. Vignali, Int. Marketing Rev. 16, 278 (1999)
B.J. Turton, C.C. Mutambirwa, Tourism Management 17, 453 (1996)
K. Raguraman, Tourism Management 19, 533 (1998)
Cost of the air transportation delay in Europe, Tech. rep.\/, EUROCONTROL - European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (2000); [http://www.eurocontrol.int/prc/reports/prr2/ index.html]
ACI Annual Worldwide Airports Traffic Reports, Tech. rep.\/, Airport Council International, Geneva (1999). [http://www.airports.org]
F. Liljeros, C.R. Edling, L.A.N. Amaral, H.E. Stanley, Y. Aberg, Nature 411, 907 (2001)
F. Liljeros, C.R. Edling, L.A.N. Amaral, Microbes Infect. 5, 189 (2003)
R. Guimerá, S. Mossa, A. Turtschi, L.A.N. Amaral, arxiv/cond-mat 0312535 (2003)
OAG MAX Database, OAG, London (2000)
D.J. Watts, S.H. Strogatz, Nature 393, 440 (1998)
L.A.N. Amaral, A. Scala, M. Barthelémy, H.E. Stanley, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11149 (2000)
L.C. Freeman, Sociometry 40, 35 (1977)
M.E.J. Newman, Phys. Rev. E 64, 016132 (2001)
A. Vázquez, R. Pastor-Satorras, A. Vespignani, Phys. Rev. E 65, 066130 (2002)
P. Holme, B.J. Kim, Phys. Rev. E 65, 056109 (2002)
K.-I. Goh, E. Oh, B. Kahng, D. Kim, Phys. Rev. E 67, 017101 (2003)
M. Barthelémy, submitted arxiv/cond-mat 0309436 (2003)
M. Newman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 208701 (2002)
S. Dorogovtsev, J.F.F. Mendes, Europhys. Lett. 52, 33 (2000)
S.-H. Yook, H. Jeong, A.-L. Barabási, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 13382 (2002)
M. Barthelémy, Europhys. Lett. 63, 915 (2003)
M. Molloy, B. Reed, Random Structures and Algorithms 6, 161 (1995)
M. Newman, S.H. Strogatz, D.J. Watts, Phys. Rev. E 64, 026118 (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Received: 14 January 2004, Published online: 14 May 2004
PACS:
89.75.Fb Structures and organization in complex systems - 89.75.Da Systems obeying scaling laws - 89.40.Dd Air transporation
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guimerá, R., Amaral, L.A.N. Modeling the world-wide airport network. Eur. Phys. J. B 38, 381–385 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2004-00131-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2004-00131-0