Abstract
The E1 contribution to the capture reaction \(^7\mathrm {Li}(n,\gamma )^8\mathrm {Li}\) is calculated at low energies. We employ a coupled-channel formalism to account for the \(^7\mathrm {Li}^\star \) excited core contribution. We develop a halo effective field theory power counting where capture in the spin \(S=2\) channel is enhanced over the \(S=1\) channel. A next-to-leading order calculation is presented where the excited core contribution is shown to affect only the overall normalization of the cross section. The momentum dependence of the capture cross section, as a consequence, is the same in a theory with or without the excited \(^7\mathrm {Li}^\star \) degree of freedom at this order of the calculation. The kinematical signature of the \(^7\mathrm {Li}^\star \) core is negligible at momenta below 1 MeV and significant only beyond the \(3^+\) resonance energy, though still compatible with a next-to-next-to-leading order correction. We compare our formalism with a previous halo effective field theory calculation [Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. C 89, 024613 (2014)] that also treated the \(^7\mathrm {Li}^\star \) core as an explicit degree of freedom. Our formal expressions and analysis disagree with this earlier work in several aspects.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Author’s comment: Experimental data is available in the cited references.]
References
M. Wiescher, F. Käppeler, K. Langanke, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 50, 165 (2012)
C.R. Brune, B. Davids, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 65, 87 (2015)
C. Bertulani, A. Gade, Phys. Rept. 485, 195 (2010). arXiv:0909.5693 [nucl-th]
L.H. Kawano, W.A. Fowler, R.W. Kavanagh, R.A. Malaney, Astrophys. J. 372, 1 (1991)
D.J. Hughes, D. Hall, C. Eggler, E. Goldfarb, Phys. Rev. 72, 646 (1947)
J.E. Lynn, E.T. Jurney, S. Raman, Phys. Rev. C 44, 764 (1991)
J.C. Blackmon et al., Phys. Rev. C 54, 383 (1996)
M. Heil, F. Käppler, M. Wiescher, A. Mengoni, Astrophys. J. 507, 1002 (1998)
Y. Nagai et al., Phys. Rev. C 71, 055803 (2005)
R. Izsák et al., Phys. Rev. C 88, 065808 (2013). arXiv:1312.3498 [nucl-ex]
P. Navratil, R. Roth, S. Quaglioni, Phys. Rev. C 82, 034609 (2010). arXiv:1007.0525 [nucl-th]
K. Bennaceur, F. Nowacki, J. Okolowicz, M. Ploszajczak, Nucl. Phys. A 651, 289 (1999). arXiv:nucl-th/9901060
K. Fossez, N. Michel, M. Płoszajczak, Y. Jaganathen, R. Id Betan, Phys. Rev. C 91, 034609 (2015). arXiv:1502.01631 [nucl-th]
P. Descouvemont, D. Baye, Nucl. Phys. A 567, 341 (1994)
T. Tombrello, Nucl. Phys. 71, 459 (1965)
A. Aurdal, Nucl. Phys. A 146, 385 (1970)
H. Esbensen, Phys. Rev. C 70, 047603 (2004)
F.C. Barker, Nucl. Phys. A 768, 241 (2006)
B. Davids, S. Typel, Phys. Rev. C 68, 045802 (2003). arXiv:nucl-th/0304054
S. Typel, G. Baur, Nucl. Phys. A 759, 247 (2005). arXiv:nucl-th/0411069
C. Bertulani, Z. Phys, A 356, 293 (1996)
J.T. Huang, C.A. Bertulani, V. Guimaraes, At. Data Nuc. Data Tables 96, 824 (2010). arXiv:0810.3867 [nucl-th]
N. Shul’gina, B. Danilin, V. Efros, J. Bang, J. Vaagen, M. Zhukov, Nucl. Phys. A 597, 197 (1996)
L. Grigorenko, B. Danilin, V. Efros, N. Shul’gina, M. Zhukov, Phys. Rev. C 60, 044312 (1999)
C. Bertulani, H. Hammer, U. van Kolck, Nucl. Phys. A 712, 37 (2002). arXiv:nucl-th/0205063
P. Bedaque, H. Hammer, U. van Kolck, Phys. Lett. B 569, 159 (2003). arXiv:nucl-th/0304007
G. Rupak, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 25, 1641004 (2016)
H.W. Hammer, C. Ji, D. Phillips, J. Phys. G 44, 103002 (2017). arXiv:1702.08605 [nucl-th]
H.-W. Hammer, S. König, U. van Kolck, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 025004 (2020). arXiv:1906.12122 [nucl-th]
G. Rupak, R. Higa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 222501 (2011). arXiv:1101.0207 [nucl-th]
L. Fernando, R. Higa, G. Rupak, Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 24 (2012). arXiv:1109.1876 [nucl-th]
X. Zhang, K.M. Nollett, D. Phillips, Phys. Rev. C 89, 024613 (2014). arXiv:1311.6822 [nucl-th]
T.D. Cohen, B.A. Gelman, U. van Kolck, Phys. Lett. B 588, 57 (2004). arXiv:nucl-th/0402054
V. Lensky, M. Birse, Eur. Phys. J. A 47, 142 (2011). arXiv:1109.2797 [nucl-th]
D. Tilley, J. Kelley, J. Godwin, D. Millener, J. Purcell, C. Sheu, H. Weller, Nucl. Phys. A 745, 155 (2004)
R. Higa, P. Premarathna, G. Rupak, Under publication
W.J. Huang, G. Audi, M. Wang, F.G. Kondev, S. Naimi, X. Xu, Chin. Phys. C 41, 030002 (2017)
M. Wang, G. Audi, F.G. Kondev, W.J. Huang, S. Naimi, X. Xu, Chin. Phys. C 41, 030003 (2017)
H.W. Griesshammer, Nucl. Phys. A 744, 192 (2004). arXiv:nucl-th/0404073
D. Tilley, C. Cheves, J. Godwin, G. Hale, H. Hofmann, J. Kelley, C. Sheu, H. Weller, Nucl. Phys. A 708, 3 (2002)
D.B. Kaplan, M.J. Savage, M.B. Wise, Phys. Lett. B 424, 390 (1998). arXiv:nucl-th/9801034
H. Knox, R. Lane, Nucl. Phys. A 359, 131 (1981)
L. Koester, K. Knopf, W. Waschkowski, Z. Phys. A 312, 81 (1983)
L. Trache, A. Azhari, F. Carstoiu, H. Clark, C. Gagliardi, Y. Lui, A. Mukhamedzhanov, X. Tang, N. Timofeyuk, Phys. Rev. C 67, 062801 (2003). arXiv:nucl-ex/0304016
A. Gul’ko, S. Trostin, A. Hudoklin, Sov. J Nucl. Phys. 6, 477 (1968)
D. Connor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 429 (1959)
Y.G. Abov, O.N. Yermakov, A.D. Gul’ko, P.A. Krupchitsky, S.S. Trostin, Nucl. Phys. 34, 505 (1962)
K.M. Nollett, R. Wiringa, Phys. Rev. C 83, 041001 (2011). arXiv:1102.1787 [nucl-th]
F. Barker, Nucl. Phys. A 588, 693 (1995)
D.R. Phillips, G. Rupak, M.J. Savage, Phys. Lett. B 473, 209 (2000). arXiv:nucl-th/9908054
C. A. Bertulani, Private communications
C.A. Bertulani, Comput. Phys. Commun. 156, 123 (2003)
R. Higa, H.W. Hammer, U. van Kolck, Nucl. Phys. A 809, 171 (2008). arXiv:0802.3426 [nucl-th]
R. Higa, G. Rupak, A. Vaghani, Eur. Phys. J. A 54, 89 (2018). arXiv:1612.08959 [nucl-th]
J.-W. Chen, G. Rupak, M.J. Savage, Nucl. Phys. A 653, 386 (1999). arXiv:nucl-th/9902056
R. Higa, P. Premarathna, G. Rupak, (2020). arXiv:2010.13003 [nucl-th]
M. A. Caprio, Comput. Phys. Commun. 171, 107 (2005). http://scidraw.nd.edu
S. Choi, J. Lee, J.S. Shim, H. Song, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 25, 576 (1992)
S. Fleming, T. Mehen, I.W. Stewart, Nucl. Phys. A 677, 313 (2000). arXiv:nucl-th/9911001
Acknowledgements
We thank C. Bertulani and A. Horváth for discussing their work on Coulomb dissociation with us. We benefited from discussions with K. M. Nollett, D. R. Phillips, and X. Zhang. This work was supported in part by U.S. NSF grants PHY-1615092 and PHY-1913620 (PP, GR) and Brazilian agency FAPESP thematic projects 2017/05660-0 and 2019/07767-1, and INCT-FNA Proc. No. 464898/2014-5 (RH). The cross section figures for this article have been created using SciDraw [57].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Pierre Capel.
Appendix A: Projectors
Appendix A: Projectors
The following are from Ref. [31] that we include for reference. For each partial wave we construct the corresponding projection operators from the relative core-nucleon velocity, the spin-1/2 Pauli matrices \(\sigma _{i}\)’s, and the following spin-1/2 to spin-3/2 transition matrices
which satisfy
where \(J_{i}^{(3/2)}\)’s are the generators of the spin-3/2. We construct the Clebsch-Gordan coefficient matrices
for projections onto spin channels \(S=1\) and \(S=2\), respectively. Then in coordinate space the relevant projectors that appear in the Lagrangians involving the \(^7\)Li ground state in Eqs. (1), (2) are [30, 31]
The tensors
ensures total angular momentum \(J=2\) is picked.
The new projectors to describe the interactions in Eq. (2) with the excited \(^7\mathrm {Li}^\star \) core are
For the external states we introduce the photon vector (\(\varepsilon ^{(\gamma )}_{i}\)), excited state \(^8\)Li \(1^+\) spin-1 (\(\varepsilon _{j}\)), and ground state \(^8\)Li \(2^+\) spin-2 (\(\varepsilon _{ij}\)) polarizations, obeying the following polarization sums [58, 59],
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Higa, R., Premarathna, P. & Rupak, G. Coupled-channel treatment of \({\varvec{^7}}\)Li\({\varvec{(n,\gamma )^8}}\)Li in effective field theory. Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 269 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00516-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00516-6