Abstract.
We briefly review the main properties of the low-lying dipole states known as Pygmy Dipole Resonance trying to select the main one which could define this new excitation mode. A good candidate seems to be the isoscalar-isovector mixing. This mixing, more effective at the nuclear surface, has been proved by both theoretical and experimental investigations. On the other hand, the study of the low-lying quadrupole states does not seem to provide clear evidence for a new excitation mode. The theoretical approaches used to investigate the quadrupole response reach different conclusions and the experimental data can only clearly establish the multipolarities of the states and their one-phonon character. Moreover, cross section calculations are not sensitive enough to disentangle between quadrupole states which are considered, in one of the theoretical approach, as due to different excitation mode.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M.N. Harakeh, A. van der Woude, Giant Resonances: Fundamental high-frequency modes of nuclear excitation (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2001)
F. Catara, E.G. Lanza, M.A. Nagarajan, A. Vitturi, Nucl. Phys. A 624, 449 (1997)
F. Catara, E.G. Lanza, M.A. Nagarajan, A. Vitturi, Nucl. Phys. A 614, 86 (1997)
N. Paar, D. Vretenar, E. Khan, G. Colò, Rep. Prog. Phys. 70, 691 (2007)
D. Savran, T. Aumann, A. Zilges, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 70, 210 (2013)
T. Aumann, T. Nakamura, Phys. Scr. T 152, 014012 (2013)
A. Bracco, F.C.L. Crespi, E.G. Lanza, Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 99 (2015)
A. Bracco, E.G. Lanza, A. Tamii, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 106, 360 (2019)
LAND Collaboration (A. Klimkiewicz et al.), Phys. Rev. C 76, 051603(R) (2007)
A. Carbone, G. Coló, A. Bracco, Li-Gang Cao, P.F. Bortignon, F. Camera, O. Wieland, Phys. Rev. C 81, 041301(R) (2010)
S. Goriely, E. Khan, M. Samyn, Nucl. Phys. A 739, 331 (2004)
E. Litvinova, H.P. Loens, K. Langanke, G. Martinez-Pinedo, T. Rauscher, P. Ring, F.-K. Thielemann, V. Tselyaev, Nucl. Phys. A 823, 26 (2009)
N. Tsoneva, S. Goriely, H. Lenske, R. Schwengner, Phys. Rev. C 91, 044318 (2015)
G.A. Bartholomew, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 11, 259 (1961)
J.S. Brzosko et al., Can. J. Phys. 47, 2849 (1969)
R. Mohen, M. Danos, L.C. Biedenharn, Phys. Rev. C 3, 1740 (1971)
H. Steinwedel, J.H.D. Jensen, Z. Naturforsch. 5a, 413 (1950)
Y. Suzuki, K. Ikeda, H. Sato, Prog. Theor. Phys. 83, 180 (1990)
M. Igashira, H. Kitazawa, M. Shimizu, H. Komano, N. Yamamuro, Nucl. Phys. A 457, 301 (1986)
M. Goldhaber, E. Teller, Phys. Rev. 74, 1046 (1948)
P. Van Isacker, M.A. Nagarajan, D.D. Warner, Phys. Rev. C 45, R13 (1992)
S. Peru, H. Goutte, Phys. Rev. C 77, 044313 (2008)
M. Martini, S. Peru, M. Dupuis, Phys. Rev. C 83, 034309 (2011)
K. Yoshida, N. Van Giai, Phys. Rev. C 78, 064316 (2008)
K. Yoshida, T. Nakatsukasa, Phys. Rev. C 88, 034309 (2013)
J. Piekarewicz, Phys. Rev. C 83, 034319 (2011)
D. Vretenar, Y.F. Niu, N. Paar, J. Meng, Phys. Rev. C 85, 044317 (2012)
J. Liang, Li-Gang Cao, Zhong-Yu Ma, Phys. Rev. C 75, 054320 (2007)
N. Paar, P. Ring, T. Nikšić, D. Vretenar, Phys. Rev. C 67, 034312 (2003)
N. Paar, Y.F. Niu, D. Vretenar, J. Meng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 032502 (2009)
D. Peña, E. Khan, P. Ring, Phys. Rev. C 79, 034311 (2009)
V.G. Soloviev, Theory of Atomic Nucleus: quasiparticles and phonons (Institute of Physics, Bristol, 1992)
C. Bertulani, Y.Yu. Ponomarev, Phys. Rep. 321, 139 (1999)
V.I. Tselyaev, Phys. Rev. C 75, 024306 (2007)
E. Litvinova, P. Ring, V. Tselyaev, Phys. Rev. C 78, 014312 (2008)
E. Litvinova, P. Ring, V. Tselyaev, K. Langanke, Phys. Rev. C 79, 054312 (2009)
E. Litvinova, P. Ring, V. Tselyaev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 022502 (2010)
G. Colò, L. Cao, N. Van Giai, L. Capelli, Comput. Phys. Comm. 184, 142 (2013)
N. Van Giai, H. Sagawa, Phys. Lett. B 106, 379 (1981)
N. Van Giai, N. Sagawa, Nucl. Phys. A 371, 1 (1981)
P. Papakostantinou, H. Hergert, R. Roth, Phys. Rev. C 92, 034311 (2015)
E.G. Lanza, F. Catara, D. Gambacurta, M.V. Andres, Ph. Chomaz, Phys. Rev. C 79, 054615 (2009)
E.G. Lanza, A. Vitturi, M.V. Andres, F. Catara, D. Gambacurta, Phys. Rev. C 84, 064602 (2011)
X. Roca-Maza, G. Pozzi, M. Brenna, K. Mizuyama, G. Colò, Phys. Rev. C 85, 024601 (2012)
E.G. Lanza, A. Vitturi, M.V. Andres, Phys. Rev. 91, 054607 (2015)
D. Vretener, N. Paar, P. Ring, T. Nikšić, Phys. Rev. C 65, 021301 (2002)
A. Repko, P.-G. Reinhard, V.O. Nesterenko, J. Kvasil, Phys. Rev. C 87, 024305 (2013)
V. Nesterenko, J. Kvasil, A. Repko, W. Kleinig, P.-G. Reinhard, Phys. At. Nucl. 79, 842 (2016)
N. Nakatsuka et al., Phys. Lett. B 768, 387 (2017)
J. Endres et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 212503 (2010)
E.G. Lanza, A. Vitturi, E. Litvinova, D. Savran, Phys. Rev. C 89, 041601(R) (2014)
K. Govaert et al., Phys. Rev. C 57, 2229 (1998)
O. Wieland et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 092502 (2009)
D.M. Rossi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 242503 (2013)
N.S. Martorana et al., Phys. Lett. B 782, 112 (2018)
N. Tsoneva, H. Lenske, Phys. Lett. B 695, 174 (2011)
L. Pellegri et al., Phys. Rev. C 92, 014330 (2015)
M. Spieker et al., Phys. Lett. B 752, 102 (2016)
G.R. Satchler, W.G. Love, Phys. Rep. 55, 183 (1979)
G. Bertsch, J. Horysowicz, H. McManus, W.G. Love, Nucl. Phys. A 284, 399 (1977)
E. Yüksel, G. Coló, E. Khan, Y.F. Niu, Phys. Rev. C 97, 064308 (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by N. Alamanos
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: All data generated during this study are contained in this published article.]
Publisher’s Note
The EPJ Publishers remain neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lanza, E.G., Pellegri, L., Andrés, M.V. et al. Low-lying dipole and quadrupole states. Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 235 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12797-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12797-y