Abstract.
The difference between observed cross sections of the evaporation residues (ER) of the 34S + 208Pb and 36S + 206Pb reactions formed in the 2n and 3n channels has been explained by two reasons related with the entrance channel characteristics of these reactions. The first reason is that the capture cross section of the latter reaction is larger than the one of the 34S + 208Pb reaction since the nucleus-nucleus potential is more attractive in the 36S + 206Pb reaction due to two more neutrons in isotope 36S. The second reason is the difference in the heights of the intrinsic fusion barrier \(B^{\ast}_{\mathrm{fus}}\) appearing on the fusion trajectory by nucleon transfer between nuclei of the DNS formed after the capture. The value of \( B^{\ast}_{\mathrm{fus}}\) calculated for the 34S + 208Pb reaction is higher than the one obtained for the 36S + 206Pb reaction. This is due to the difference between the \( N/Z\)-ratios in the light fragments of the DNS formed during the capture in these reactions. The \( N/Z\)-ratio has been found by the solution of the transport master equations for the proton and neutron distributions between fragments of the DNS formed at the capture with the different initial neutron numbers \( N=18\) and \( N=20\) for the reactions with the 34S and 36S, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Khuyagbaatar, K. Nishio, S. Hofmann, D. Ackermann, M. Block, S. Heinz, F. P. Heßberger, K. Hirose, H. Ikezoe, B. Kinlder, B. Lommel, H. Makii, S. Mitsuoka, I. Nishinaka, T. Ohtsuki, Y. Wakabayashi, S. Yan, Phys. Rev. C 86, 064602 (2012)
J. Khuyagbaatar, D.J. Hinde, I.P. Carter, M. Dasgupta, Ch.E. Dullmann, M. Evers, D.H. Luong, R. du Rietz, A. Wakhle, E. Williams, A. Yakushev, Phys. Rev. C 91, 054608 (2015)
K. Hagino et al., Comput. Phys. Commun. 123, 143 (1999)
W. Reisdorf, Z. Phys. A 300, 227 (1981)
C. Simenel et al., Phys. Lett. B 710, 607 (2012)
G. Fazio, G. Giardina, G. Mandaglio, F. Hanappe, A.I. Muminov, A.K. Nasirov, W. Scheid, L. Stuttge, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 20, 391 (2005)
G. Mohanto et al., Phys. Rev. C 97, 054603 (2018)
G.N. Knyazheva, E.M. Kozulin, R.N. Sagaidak, A.Yu. Chizhov, M.G. Itkis, N.A. Kondratiev, V.M. Voskressensky, A.M. Stefanini, B.R. Behera, L. Corradi, E. Fioretto, A. Gadea, A. Latina, S. Szilner, M. Trotta, S. Beghini, G. Montagnoli, F. Scarlassara, F. Haas, N. Rowley, P.R.S. Gomes, A. Szanto de Toledo, Phys. Rev. C 75, 064602 (2007)
A.K. Nasirov, G. Giardina, G. Mandaglio, M. Manganaro, F. Hanappe, S. Heinz, S. Hofmann, A.I. Muminov, C. Sacca, Phys. Rev. C 79, 024606 (2009)
G. Giardina et al., J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 282, 012006 (2011)
Avazbek Nasirov et al., J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 282, 012010 (2011)
Meenu Thakur et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 133 (2017)
Bing Wang, Kai Wen, Wei-Juan Zhao, En-Guang Zhao Shan-Gui Zhou, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 114, 282 (2017)
A. Nasirov, A. Fukushima, Y. Toyoshima, Y. Aritomo, A. Muminov, S. Kalandarov, R. Utamuratov, Nucl. Phys. A 759, 342 (2005)
G. Giardina, S. Hofmann, A.I. Muminov, A.K. Nasirov, Eur. Phys. J. A 8, 205 (2000)
G. Fazio, G. Giardina, A. Lamberto, A.I. Muminov, A.K. Nasirov, F. Hanappe, L. Stuttgé, Eur. Phys. J. A 22, 75 (2004)
S. Raman, C.W. Nestor jr., P. Tikkanen, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 78, 1 (2001)
R.H. Spear, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 42, 55 (1989)
H. Esbensen, Nucl. Phys. A 352, 141 (1981)
G.G. Adamian, R.V. Jolos, A.K. Nasirov, A.I. Muminov, Phys. Rev. C 56, 373 (1997)
A. Nasirov, B. Kayumov, Y. Oh, Nucl. Phys. A 946, 89 (2016)
G. Audi, A.H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A 595, 509 (1995)
P. Möller, J.R. Nix, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 20, 1681 (1994)
I. Muntian, Z. Patyk, A. Sobiczewski, Phys. At. Nucl. 66, 1015 (2003)
K. Kim, Y. Kim, A.K. Nasirov, G. Mandaglio, G. Giardina, Phys. Rev. C 91, 064608 (2015)
G. Fazio, G. Giardina, G. Mandaglio, R. Ruggeri, A.I. Muminov, A.K. Nasirov, Yu.Ts. Oganessian, A.G. Popeko, R.N. Sagaidak, A.V. Yeremin, S. Hofmann, F. Hanappe, C. Stodel, Phys. Rev. C 72, 064614 (2005)
G.G. Adamian, A.K. Nasirov, N.V. Antonenko, R.V. Jolos, Phys. Part. Nucl. 25, 583 (1994)
Diaz-Torres et al., Phys. Rev. C 64, 014604 (2001)
R.V. Jolos, A.I. Muminov, A.K. Nasirov, Yad. Fiz. 44, 357 (1986) Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 44
G.G. Adamian, R.V. Jolos, A.K. Nasirov, Yad. Fiz. 55, 660 (1992) Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 55
G.G. Adamian, R.V. Jolos, A.K. Nasirov, Z. Phys. A 347, 203 (1994)
G.G. Adamian, N.V. Antonenko, W. Scheid, Phys. Rev. C 68, 034601 (2003)
A.K. Nasirov, A.I. Muminov, R.K. Utamuratov, G. Fazio, G. Giardina, F. Hanappe, G. Mandaglio, M. Manganaro, W. Scheid, Eur. Phys. J. A 34, 325 (2007)
G. Fazio, G. Giardina, F. Hanappe, M. Manganaro, A.I. Muminov, A.K. Nasirov, C. Saccá, Phys. At. Nucl. 72, 1639 (2009)
N.V. Antonenko, E.A. Cherepanov, A.K. Nasirov, V.P. Permyakov, V.V. Volkov, Phys. Lett. B 319, 425 (1993)
N.V. Antonenko, E.A. Cherepanov, A.K. Nasirov, V.P. Permyakov, V.V. Volkov, Phys. Rev. C 51, 2635 (1995)
G.G. Adamian, N.V. Antonenko, W. Scheid, Phys. Rev. C 69, 044601 (2004)
P.J. Siemens, A.S. Jensen, Elements of Nuclei, Lecture Notes and Supplements in Physics (Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, California, 1987)
G. Mandaglio, G. Giardina, A.K. Nasirov, A. Sobiczewski, Phys. Rev. C 86, 064607 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by P. Capel
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: All theoretical results devoted to explain the difference between measured complete fusion and evaporation residues cross sections in the two reactions with the different isotopes of S and Pb leading to the same nucleus 242Cf which have been generated during this study are contained in this published article.]
Publisher’s Note
The EPJ Publishers remain neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nasirov, A.K., Kayumov, B.M., Mandaglio, G. et al. The effect of the neutron and proton numbers ratio in colliding nuclei on the formation of the evaporation residues in the 34S + 208Pb and 36S + 206Pb reactions. Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 29 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12688-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12688-3