Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Causality discovery technology

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Special Topics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Causality is the fabric of our dynamic world. We all make frequent attempts to reason causation relationships of everyday events (e.g., what was the cause of my headache, or what has upset Alice?). We attempt to manage causality all the time through planning and scheduling. The greatest scientific discoveries are usually about causality (e.g., Newton found the cause for an apple to fall, and Darwin discovered natural selection). Meanwhile, we continue to seek a comprehensive understanding about the causes of numerous complex phenomena, such as social divisions, economic crisis, global warming, home-grown terrorism, etc. Humans analyse and reason causality based on observation, experimentation and acquired a priori knowledge. Today’s technologies enable us to make observations and carry out experiments in an unprecedented scale that has created data mountains everywhere. Whereas there are exciting opportunities to discover new causation relationships, there are also unparalleled challenges to benefit from such data mountains. In this article, we present a case for developing a new piece of ICT, called Causality Discovery Technology. We reason about the necessity, feasibility and potential impact of such a technology.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Ajmone-Marsan, et al., Eur. Phys. J. Special Topic 214, 547 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Atkinson, D. DeRoure, A. Dunlop, G. Fox, P. Henderson, T. Hey, N. Paton, S. Newhouse, S. Parastatidis, A. Trefethen, P. Watson, J. Webber, Concurr. Computation: Practice Exper. 17, 377 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Bañares-Alcántara, J.M.P. King, Comput. Chem. Eng. 21, 263 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Batty, et al., Eur. Phys. J. Special Topic 214, 481 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Beebee, C. Hitchcock, P. Menzies (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Causation (Oxford University Press, 2009)

  6. D. Bohm, Causality and Chance in Modern Physics (Routledge, 1984)

  7. M. Born, Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance (Dover Publications, New York, 1949)

  8. A. Carbone, et al., Eur. Phys. J. Special Topic 214, 435 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Chen, D. Ebert, H. Hagen, R.S. Laramee, R. van Liere, K.-L. Ma, W. Ribarsky, G. Scheuermann, D. Silver, IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 29, 12 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Chen, H. Jänicke, IEEE Trans. Visualization Computer Graph. 16, 1206 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Cincotti, et al., Eur. Phys. J. Special Topic 214, 361 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Coecke, Contemporary Physics 51, 59 (2010) [arXiv: 0908.1787] [quant-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. B. Coecke, R. Lal, “Causal categories: relativistically interacting processes” (2011) [arXiv: 1107.6019] [gr-qc]

  14. R. Conte, et al., Eur. Phys. J. Special Topic 214, 325 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Deffuant, et al., Eur. Phys. J. Special Topic 214, 519 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. Doering, S. Beckhaus, A. Schmidt, Proc. CHI 2009, 4627 (2009)

  17. J.D. Farmer, et al., Eur. Phys. J. Special Topic 214, 295 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. de la Flor, M. Jirotka, “Blurring the distinction between software design and work practice”, in Proc. 2nd International Symposium on End User Development (2009)

  19. F. Grave, T. Müller, G. Wunner, T. Ertl, M. Buser, W.P. Schleich, “Visualization of the Gdel Spacetime”, in Proc. 4th High-End Visualization Workshop (2007), p. 62

  20. S. Havlin, et al., Eur. Phys. J. Special Topic 214, 273 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Helbing, “The FuturIcT Knowledge Accelerator: Unleashing the Power of Information for a Sustainable Future”, CCSS Working Paper Series, CCSS-10-003 (2010) [arXiv:1004.4969v2]

  22. D. Helbing, et al., Eur. Phys. J. Special Topic 214, 11 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. D. Helbing, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topic 214, 41 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. T. Hey, S. Tansley, K. Tolle (eds.), The Fourth Paradigm, (2009), http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/collaboration/fourthparadigm/

  25. T. Hey, A.E. Trefethen, Future Generation Comput. Syst. 18, 1017 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. T. Hey, A. Trefethen, “The Data Deluge: An e-Science Perspective”, in Grid Computing: Making the Global Infrastructure a Reality, edited by F. Berman, G. Fox, T. Hey (John Wiley & Sons, 2003)

  27. P.M. Illari, F. Russo, J. Williamson (eds.), Causality in the Sciences (Oxford University Press, 2011)

  28. J. Johnson, et al., Eur. Phys. J. Special Topic 214, 215 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. Koch, H. Bosch, M. Giereth, T. Ertl, IEEE Trans. Visualization Computer Graph. 17, 557 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. D. Kossman, et al., Eur. Phys. J. Special Topic 214, 77 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  31. M. San Miguel, et al., Eur. Phys. J. Special Topic 214, 245 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  32. C. Müller, S. Frey, M. Strengert, C. Dachsbacher, T. Ertl, IEEE Trans. Visualization Computer Graph. 15, 1 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. M. Nielsen, Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science (Princeton University Press, 2011)

  34. J. Pearl, Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference (Cambridge University Press, 2000)

  35. J. Perelló, et al., Eur. Phys. J. Special Topic 214, 597 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  36. F. Russo, Causality and Causal Modelling in the Social Sciences: Measuring Variations (Springer, 2010)

  37. W.C. Salmon, Causality and Explanation (Oxford University Press, 1997)

  38. E. Sosa, M. Tooley (eds.), Causation, Oxford Readings in Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 1993)

  39. P. Spirtes, C. Glymour, R. Scheines, Causation, Prediction, and Search (The MIT Press, 2001)

  40. G.K.L. Tam, H. Fang, A.J. Aubrey, P.W. Grant, P.L. Rosin, D. Marshall, M. Chen, Computer Graphics Forum 30, 901 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. J.J. Thomas, K.A. Cook (eds.), Illuminating the Path: The R&D Agenda for Visual Analytics (National Visualization and Analytics Center, 2005)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, M., Ertl, T., Jirotka, M. et al. Causality discovery technology. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 214, 461–479 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01702-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01702-4

Keywords

Navigation