Abstract
A systematic sequencing of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) was used to obtain a global picture of the assembly of barley genes differentially expressed during the hypersensitive reaction of a susceptible genotype in response to an incompatible Cochliobolus sativus pathovar. To identify a large number of plant ESTs, which are induced at different time points, an amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) display of complementary DNA (cDNA) was ulilized. Significant transcriptional changes in the host plant occurred already 4 h post inoculation. Four hundred and fifty six ESTs have been generated, of which 17 (c. 53% up-regulated, 47% down-regulated) have no previously described function. On one hand, the majority of EST-annotations showed protein synthesis, but genes related to signal transduction pathway were also identified. This study provides novel global catalogue of gene regulations involved in C. sativus-barley interaction not currently represented in EST databases.
References
Kumar, J., Schafer, P., Huckelhoven, R., et al., Bipolaris sorokiniana, a Cereal Pathogen of Global Concern: Cytological and Molecular Approaches towards Better Control, Mol. Plant Pathol., 2002, vol. 3, pp. 185–195.
Schaefer, P., Hueckelhoven, R., and Kogel, K.H., The White Barley Mutant albostrians Shows a Super Susceptible but Symptomless Interaction Phenotype with the Hemibiotrophic Fungus Bipolaris sorokiniana, Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact., 2004, vol. 17, pp. 366–373.
Yadav, B.S., Behavior of Cochliobolus sativus during Its Infection of Barley and Wheat Leaves, Austral. J. Bot., 1981, vol. 29, pp. 71–79.
Arabi, M.I.E. and Jawhar, M., Identification of Cochliobolus sativus (Spot Blotch) Isolates Expressing Differential Virulence on Barley Genotypes in Syria, J. Phytopathol., 2004, vol. 152, pp. 461–464.
Ghazvini, H. and Tekauz, A., Host Pathogen Interactions among Barley Genotypes and Bipolaris sorokiniana Isolates. Plant Dis., 2008, vol. 92, pp. 225–233.
Santen, K., Pathogenesis-Related Proteins in Barley: Localization and Accumulation Patterns in Response to Infection by Bipolaris sorokiniana, Doctoral dissertation, ISBN, 2007, vol. 5, pp. 576.
Al-Daoude, A. and Jawhar, M., Transcriptional Changes in Barley-Cochliobolus sativus Interaction. Austral. Plant Pathol., 2009, vol. 38, pp. 1–5.
Hueckelhoven, R., Dechert, C., Trujillo, M., and Kogel, K.H., Differential Expression of Putative Cell Death Regulator Genes in Near-Isogenic, Resistant and Susceptible Barley Lines during Interaction with the Powdery Mildew Fungus, Plant Mol. Biol., 2001, vol. 47, pp. 739–748.
Wendy, E.D., Rowland, O., Piedras, P., et al., cDNA-AFLP Reveals a Striking Overlap in Race-Specific Resistance and Wound Response Gene Expression Profiles, Plant Cell, 2000, vol. 12, pp. 963–977.
Polesani, M., Desario, F., Ferrarini, A., et al., cDNA-AFLP Analysis of Plant and Pathogen Genes Expressed in Grapevine Infected with Plasmopara viticola, BMC Genomics, 2008, vol. 9, pp. 142–147.
Bachem, C.W., van der Hoeven, R.S., de Bruijn, S.M., et al., Visualization of Differential Gene Expression Using a Novel Method of RNA Fingerprinting Based on AFLP: Analysis of Gene Expression during Potato Tuber Development, Plant J., 1996, vol. 9, pp. 745–753.
Arabi, M.I.E. and Jawhar, M., Pathotypes of Cochliobolus sativus (Spot Blotch) on Barley in Syria. J. Plant Pathol., 2003, vol. 85, pp. 193–196.
Arabi, M.I.E. and Jawhar, M., Molecular and Pathogenic Variation Identified among Isolates of Cochliobolus sativus, Austral. Plant Pathol., 2007, vol. 36, pp. 17–21.
Breyne, P., Dreesen, R., and Vandepoele, K., Transcriptome Analysis during Cell Division in Plants, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 2002, vol. 99, pp. 14825–14830.
Wisniewska, H., Wakulinski, W., and Chelkowski, J., Susceptibility of Barleys to Bipolaris sorokiniana Seedling Blight Determined by Disease Scoring and Electrolyte, J. Phytopathol., 1998, vol. 146, pp. 563–566.
Kortekamp, A., Wind, R., and Zyprian, E., Investigation of the Interaction of Plasmopara viticola with Susceptible and Resistant Genotypes, J. Plant Dis. Protect., 1998, vol. 105, pp. 475–488.
Kiefer, B., Riemann, M., Buche, C., et al., The Host Guides Morphogenesis and Stomatal Targeting in the Grapevine Pathogen Plasmopara viticola, Planta, 2002, vol. 215, pp. 387–393.
Yokota, E., McDonald, A.R., Liu, B., et al., Localization of a 170kDa Myosin Heavy Chain in Plant Cells, Protoplasma, 1995, vol.185, pp. 178–187.
Schmelzer, E., Cell Polarization, a Crucial Process in Fungal Defense, Trends Plant Sci., 2002, vol. 7, pp. 411–415.
Veronese, P., Ruiz, M.T., Coca, M.A., et al., Defense against Pathogens: Both Plant Sentinels and Foot Soldiers Need to Know the Enemy, Plant Physiol., 2003, vol.131, pp. 1580–1590.
Lipka, V. and Panstruga, R., Dynamic Cellular Responses in Plant-Microbe Interactions, Curr. Op. Plant Biol., 2005, vol. 8, pp. 525–631.
Fung, R.W., Gonzalo, M., Fekete, C., et al., Powdery Mildew Induces Defense-Oriented Reprogramming of the Transcriptome in a Susceptible but not in a Resistant Grapevine, Plant Physiol., 2008, p. 146, pp. 236–249.
Narasimhan, M.L., Damsz, B., Coca, M.A., et al., A Plant Defense Response Effectors Induces Microbial Apoptosis, Mol. Cell, 2001, vol. 8, pp. 921–930.
Hueckelhoven, R., Dechert, C., and Kogel, K.H., Overexpression of Barley BAX Inhibitor-1 Induces Breakdown of mlo-Mediated Penetration Resistance to Blumeria graminis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2003, vol.100, pp. 5555–5560.
Jarosch, B., Kogel, K.H., and Schaffrath, U., The Ambivalence of the Barley Mlo Locus: Mutations Conferring Resistance against Powdery Mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei) Enhance Susceptibility to the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe grisea, Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact., 1999, vol. 12, pp. 508–514.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The article is published in the original.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arabi, M.I.E., Al-Daoude, A., Shoaib, A. et al. Transcriptional interactions during barley susceptible genotype infection with Cochliobolus sativus . Russ J Genet 47, 879–883 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795411070027
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795411070027