Skip to main content
Log in

The ongoing quest for the IT artifact: Looking back, moving forward

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Information Technology

Abstract

More than 10 years ago, Orlikowski and Iacono (2001) examined the conceptualization of Information Technology (IT) in Information Systems Research (ISR) articles published in the 1990s. Their main conclusion was that the majority of these articles did not properly conceptualize the IT artifact. They recommended that IS researchers start to theorize about the IT artifact and employ rich conceptualizations of IT. The Orlikowski and Iacono paper provides a strong anchor point from which to analyze the evolution of the IS discipline. In order to obtain an up-to-date image of contemporary IS research, and to assess how the IS field has evolved since the 1990s, we carried out a similar analysis on a more recent and broader set of articles, that is, the full set (N=644) of papers published between 2006 and 2009 by six top North American (ISR, MISQ, JAIS) and European (JIT, ISJ, EJIS) journals. The statistics in our results reveal no drastic advance in terms of deeper engagement with the IT artifact; more than 39% of the articles in our set are virtually mute about the artifact, and less than 16% employ an ensemble view of IT. Moreover, we note differences among the North American and European journals. Implications of the findings for two perspectives central to the IS research legitimacy debate are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We contacted Dr. Orlikowski and Dr. Iacono, in this regard. Unfortunately the data from the original paper are not available anymore.

  2. We thank the senior editor for suggesting this idea.

References

  • Agarwal, R. and Lucas, H.C. (2005). The Information Systems Identity Crisis: Focusing on high-visibility and high-impact research, MIS Quarterly 29 (3): 381–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, S. (2003a). 18 Reasons Why IT-Reliant Work Systems Should Replace ‘The IT Artifact’ as the Core Subject Matter of the IS Field, Communications of the AIS 12 (1): 365–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, S. (2003b). The IS Core XI: Sorting out issues about the core, scope and identity of the IS field, Communications of the AIS 12 (1): 607–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, S. (2003c). Sidestepping the IT Artifact, Scrapping the IS Silo, and Laying Claim to ‘Systems in Organizations’, Communications of the AIS 12 (1): 494–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptista, J. (2009). Institutionalisation as a Process of Interplay between Technology and its Organisational Context of Use, Journal of Information Technology 24 (4): 305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K.M. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barki, H. (2008). Thar's Gold in them Thar Constructs, SIGMIS Database 39 (3): 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville, R. (2012). Reviving the IT in the IS, European Journal of Information Systems 21 (6): 587–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beath, C.M. and Orlikowski, W.J. (1994). The Contradictory Structure of Systems Development Methodologies: Deconstructing the IS-user relationship in information engineering, Information Systems Research 4 (5): 350–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I. and Zmud, R. (2003). The Identity Crisis within the IS Discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties, MIS Quarterly 27 (2): 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, A. (2008). The Future of Information Systems – Thinking informatically, European Journal of Information Systems 17 (6): 695–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J., Fletcher, G. and Greenhill, A. (2009). Conflict and Identity Shape Shifting in an Online Financial Community, Information Systems Journal 19 (5): 461–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Galliers, B., Henfridsson, O., Newell, S. and Vidgen, R. (2010). On sociomateriality of information systems and organizing, (Call for Papers – MISQ Special Issue) [WWW document] http://www.misq.org/skin/frontend/default/misq/pdf/CurrentCalls/SI_Sociomateriality.pdf (accessed 1 September 2012).

  • Clegg, B. and Shaw, D. (2008). Using Process-oriented Holonic (PrOH) Modelling to Increase Understanding of Information Systems, Information Systems Journal 18 (5): 447–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement 20 (1): 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordoba, J.R. and Midgley, G. (2008). Beyond Organisational Agendas: Using boundary critique to facilitate the inclusion of societal concerns in information systems planning, European Journal of Information Systems 17 (2): 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordoba, J.R., Pilkington, A. and Bernroider, E.W.N. (2012). Information Systems as a Discipline in the Making: Comparing EJIS and MISQ Between 1995 and 2008, European Journal of Information Systems 21 (5): 479–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deans, P.C. (2003). The IS Core III: The core domain debate and the international business discipline: A comparison, Communications of the AIS 12 (1): 546–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S., Fuller, M.A. and Schneider, C. (2006). Research Standards or Promotion and Tenure in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly 30 (1): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis, G. (2003). The Social Life of Information Systems Research A Response to Benbasat and Zmud's Call for Returning to the IT Artifact, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 4 (7): 360–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufner, D. (2003). The IS Core I: Economic and systems engineering approaches to IS identity, Communications of the AIS 12 (1): 527–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Sawy, O.A. (2003). The IS Core IX: The 3 faces of is identity: connection, immersion, and fusion, Communications of the AIS 12 (1): 588–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, L. and Markovich, S. (2008). Generic Verticalization Strategies in Enterprise System Markets: An exploratory framework, Journal of Information Technology 23 (4): 281–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R.M. and Dennis, A.R. (2009). Does Fit Matter? The Impact of Task-Technology Fit and Appropriation on Team Performance in Repeated Tasks, Information Systems Research 20 (1): 2–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galliers, R.D. and Whitley, E.A. (2007). Vive les Differences? Developing a Profile of European Information Systems Research as a Basis for International Comparisons, European Journal of Information Systems 16 (1): 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallivan, M.J. and Benbunan-Fich, R. (2007). Analyzing IS Research Productivity: An inclusive approach to global IS scholarship, European Journal of Information Systems 16 (1): 36–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the theory of structuration, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhue, D.L. (2007). Comment on Benbasat and Barki's Quo Vadis TAM article, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8 (4): 219–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P. (2003). Introduction to the Debate on the Core of the Information Systems Field, Communications of the AIS 12 (1), Article 42.

  • Grover, V., Lyytinen, K., Srinivasan, A. and Tan, B.C.Y. (2008). Contributing to Rigorous and Forward Thinking Explanatory Theory, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9 (2): 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatzakis, T., Lycett, M. and Serrano, A. (2007). A Programme Management Approach for Ensuring Curriculum Coherence in IS (higher) Education, European Journal of Information Systems 16 (5): 643–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepsø, V., Monteiro, E. and Rolland, K.H. (2009). Ecologies of e-Infrastructures, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10 (5): 430–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R. (2008). Some Guidelines for the Critical Reviewing of Conceptual Papers, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9 (8): 432–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R. and Klein, H.K. (2003). Crisis in the IS Field? A Critical Reflection on the State of the Discipline, Journal of the AIS 4 (5): 237–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICIS (2012). International Conference on Information Systems Registrant List, [WWW document] http://icis2012.aisnet.org/Files/Reg%20List.pdf (accessed 25 December 2012).

  • Iivari, J. (2002). The IS Core VII: Towards information systems as a science of meta-artifacts, Communications of the AIS 12 (1): 568–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives, B., Parks, M.S., Porra, J. and Silva, L. (2004). Phylogeny and Power in the IS Domain: A response to Benbasat and Zmud's call for returning to the IT artifact, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5 (3): 108–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • JAIS (2012). JAIS ranking information, [WWW document] http://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/distribution.html (accessed 1 September 2012).

  • JCR (2012). Journal citation reports, [WWW document] http://webofknowledge.com/JCR:ThomsonReuters (accessed 1 September 2012).

  • Klein, H.K. and Rowe, F. (2008). Marshaling the Professional Experience of Doctoral Students: A contribution to the practical relevance debate, MIS Quarterly 32 (4): 675–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. and Hacking, I. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 4th edn, Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J.R. and Koch, G.G. (1977). The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data, Biometrics 33 (1): 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, R. (1993). Case Survey Methodology: Quantitative analysis of patterns across case studies, The Academy of Management Journal 36 (6): 1515–1546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, P.M. (2011). Innovation Blindness: Culture, frames, and cross-boundary problem construction in the development of new technology concepts, Organization Science 22 (2): 347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, P.M. and Barley, S.R. (2008). Materiality and Change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing, Information and Organization 18 (3): 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, P.M. and Barley, S.R. (2010). What's Under Construction Here? Social Action, Materiality, and Power in Constructivist Studies of Technology and Organizing, The Academy of Management Annals 4 (1): 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, P.B., Karuga, G.G. and Richardson, V.J. (2007). Assessing Leading Institutions, Faculty, and Articles in Premier Information Systems Research Journals, Communications of AIS 2007 (20): 142–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M.L. and Saunders, C. (2007). Looking for a Few Good Concepts … and Theories … for the Information Systems Field – Editor's Comments, MIS Quarterly 31 (1): Iii–Vi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M.L. and Silver, M.S. (2008). A Foundation for the Study of IT Effects: A new look at Desanctis and Poole's concepts of structural features and spirit, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9 (10): 609.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbrey, D.J. (2003). The IS Core IV: IS research: A third way, Communications of the AIS 12 (1): 553–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mourmant, G., Gallivan, M.J. and Kalika, M. (2009). Another Road to IT Turnover: The entrepreneurial path, European Journal of Information Systems 18 (5): 498–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M.D. (2003). The IS Core – VIII: Defining the core properties of the IS disciplines: Not yet, not now, Communications of the AIS 12 (1), Article 38.

  • Myyry, L., Siponen, M., Pahnila, S., Vartiainen, T. and Vance, A. (2009). What Levels of Moral Reasoning and Values Explain Adherence to Information Security Rules? An empirical study, European Journal of Information Systems 18 (2): 126–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhout, M., Waarts, E. and van Hillegersberg, J. (2006). Change Factors Requiring Agility and Implications for IT, European Journal of Information Systems 15 (2): 132–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. (2007). Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work, Organization studies 28 (9): 1435–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization, The Academy of Management annals 2 (1): 433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. and Iacono, S. (2001). Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the ‘IT’ in IT Research: A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact, Information Systems Research 12 (2): 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. and Scott, S.V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization, The Academy of Management annals 2 (1): 433–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oshri, I., Van Fenema, P. and Kotlarsky, J. (2008). Knowledge Transfer in Globally Distributed Teams: The role of transactive memory, Information Systems Journal 18 (6): 593–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, G., Pan, S.L., Newman, M. and Flynn, D. (2006). Escalation and De-escalation of Commitment: A commitment transformation analysis of an e-government project, Information Systems Journal 16 (1): 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinsonneault, A. and Barki, H. (2012). Conceptualizing the Organizational IT Artifact via the Construct of Organizational Integration, in Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), (Maui, Hawaii, USA). Washington DC: IEEE Computer Society Press, 5184–5193.

  • Pitts, M.G. and Browne, G.J. (2007). Improving Requirements Elicitation: An empirical investigation of procedural prompts, Information Systems Journal 17 (1): 89–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, D.J. (2003). The IS Core II: The maturing IS discipline: Institutionalizing our domain of inquiry, Communications of the AIS 12 (1): 539–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemer, K. and Klein, S. (2008). Is the V-form the Next Generation Organisation? An analysis of challenges, pitfalls and remedies of ICT-enabled virtual organisations based on social capital theory, Journal of Information Technology 23 (3): 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robey, D. (2003). Identity, Legitimacy and the Dominant Research Paradigm: An alternative prescription for the IS discipline, Journal of the AIS 4 (7): 352–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahay, S., Aanestad, M. and Monteiro, E. (2009). Configurable Politics and Asymmetric Integration: Health e-infrastructures in India, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10 (5): 399–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, C. (2005). Editor's Comments: Looking for Diamond Cutters, MIS Quarterly 29 (1): iii–viii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, C. and Benbasat, I. (2007). A Camel Going Through the Eye of a Needle, MIS Quarterly 31 (3): iv–xviii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidorova, A., Evangelopoulos, N., Valacich, J.S. and Ramakrishnan, T. (2008). Uncovering the Intellectual Core of the Information Systems Discipline, MIS Quarterly 32 (3): 467–A20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, L. (2007). Epistemological and Theoretical Challenges for Studying Power and Politics in Information Systems, Information Systems Journal 17 (2): 165–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straub, D.W. and Ang, S. (2008). Readability and the Relevance Versus Rigor Debate, MIS Quarterly 32 (4): Iii–X.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, S.G., Hampton, C., Khazanchi, D. and Arnold, V. (2008). Risk Analysis in Extended Enterprise Environments: Identification of critical risk factors in B2B e-commerce relationships, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9 (3–4): 151–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C.X. and Sia, S.K. (2006). Managing Flexibility in Outsourcing, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 7 (4): 179–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trauth, E.M., Quesenberry, J.L. and Huang, H.Y. (2009). Retaining Women in the US IT Workforce: Theorizing the influence of organizational factors, European Journal of Information Systems 18 (5): 476–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V. and Ramesh, V. (2006). Web and Wireless Site Usability: Understanding differences and modeling use, MIS Quarterly 30 (1): 181–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organisations, Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattal, S., Schuff, D., Mandviwalla, M. and Williams, C.B. (2010). Web 2.0 and Politics: The 2008 u.s. presidential election and an e-politics research agenda, MIS Quarterly 34 (4): 669–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. (2003). Still Desperately Seeking the IT Artifact, MIS Quarterly 27 (2): 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y.A. and Saunders, C. (2003). The IS Core VI: Further along the road to the IT artifact, Communications of the AIS 12 (1): 562–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and methods, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zammuto, R.F., Griffith, T.L., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D.J. and Faraj, S. (2007). Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization, Organization Science 18 (5): 749–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff, S. (1988). In the Age of the Smart Machine: The future of work and power, London: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the senior editor, Jaana Porra, for her guidance throughout the reviewing process and the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. The research was supported financially by the Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Société et la Culture (FQRSC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saeed Akhlaghpour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akhlaghpour, S., Wu, J., Lapointe, L. et al. The ongoing quest for the IT artifact: Looking back, moving forward. J Inf Technol 28, 150–166 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2013.10

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2013.10

Keywords

Navigation