Skip to main content

The Stock Return Predictability and Stock Price Decomposition in the Chinese Equity Market

  • Chapter
  • 172 Accesses

Abstract

Since its advent in 1991, the Chinese equity market has developed greatly and has quickly become the 3rd largest stock market in the world, when combining both the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. There are several interesting features about the Chinese equity market given the nature of the transition economy of the Chinese nation (see e.g., Su, Ma, and Wohar (2014) for a detailed discussion). Because of its rapid growth, the Chinese equity market provides unique characteristics that are distinct from other well-developed equity markets. This lends itself to empirical tests of the validity of several asset pricing models. In this work, we focus our work primarily on the class A share market in the Chinese equity market in order to study the price fluctuations of those shares that are readily accessible by the domestic investors. We hope that such a study can shed light on some of the important topics in finance related to whether stock returns are predictable, and whether it is the cash flow component or the discount factor that dominates aggregate stock price fluctuations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Balke, N. S. & Wohar, M. E. 2002. Low frequency movements in stock prices: A state-space decomposition. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(4), 649–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, R. & Yaron, A. 2004. Risks for the long run: a potential resolution of asset pricing puzzles. Journal of Finance, 59(4), 1481–1509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binsbergen, J. H. van & Koijen, R. S. J. 2010. Predictive regressions: A present-value approach. Journal of Finance, 65(4), 1439–1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. 1991. A variance decomposition for stock returns. Economic Journal, 101(405), 157–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. & Ammer, J. 1993. What moves the stock and bond markets? A variance decomposition for long-term asset returns. Journal of Finance, 48(1), 3–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. & Cochrane, J. 1999. By force of habit: A consumption-based explanation of aggregate stock market behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 107(2), 205–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. & Shiller, R. 1988a. The dividend-price ratio and expectations of future dividends and discount factors. Review of Financial Studies, 1(3), 195–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J. & Shiller, R. 1988b. Stock prices, earnings, and expected dividends. Journal of Finance, 43(3), 661–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. E. & McCracken, M. W. 2001. Tests of equal forecast accuracy and forecast encompassing for nested Models. Journal of Econometrics, 105, 85–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. E. & McCracken, M. W. 2004. Evaluating long-horizon forecasts. University of Missouri — Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, J. 2008. State-space vs. VAR models for stock returns. Working paper, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuthbertson, K., Hayes, S. & Nitzsche, D. 1999. Explaining movements in UK stock prices. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 39(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diebold, F. X. & Mariano, R. S. 1995. Comparing predictive accuracy. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13, 253–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L.G. & Zin, S. E. 1989. Substitution, risk aversion and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: A theoretical framework. Econometrica, 57(4), 937–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. 1986. A standard error for the estimated state vector of a state-space model. Journal of Econometrics, 33(3), 387–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. D. 1994. Time series analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P.L. & Hodrick, R. J. 1980. Forward exchange rates as optimal predictors of future spot rates: An econometric analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 829–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L. P., Heaton, J. C. & Li, N. 2008. Consumption strikes back? Measuring long-run risk. Journal of Political Economy, 116, 260–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, F., Rapach, D. E., Strauss, J. K., Tu, J. & Zhou, G. 2011. How predictable is the Chinese stock market? Journal of Financial Research [in Chinese], 9, 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C.-J. & Nelson, C. R. 1999. State-space models with regime switching: Classical and Gibbs-sampling approaches with applications. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, J. 2013. Long-run risk and its implications for the equity premium puzzle: New evidence from a multivariate framework. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 45, 121–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, J. & Nelson, C. R. 2014. The Superiority of the LM Test in a Class of Econometrics Models Where Standard Wald Test Performs Poorly. In Koopman, S. J. & Shephard, N. (eds) Unobserved Components and Time Series Econometrics, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, J. & Wohar, M. E. 2014. Expected returns and expected dividend growth: Time to rethink an established empirical literature. Applied Economics, 46, 2462–2476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark, N. C. 1995. Exchange rates and fundamentals: Evidence on long-horizon predictability. American Economic Review, 85(1), 201–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, M. 2004. Asymptotics for out-of-sample tests of Granger causality. University of Missouri, Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, R. & Prescott, E. C. 1985. The equity premium: a puzzle. Journal ofMonetary Economics, 15(2), 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, J., Nelson, C. R. & Zivot, E. 2003. Why are unobserved component and Beveridge-Nelson trend-cycle decompositions of GDP are so different? Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(2), 235–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, C.R. & Kim, M.J. 1993. Predictable stock returns: The role of small sample bias. The Journal of Finance, 48 (June), 641–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, CR. & Schwert, W. 1977. On testing the hypothesis that the real rate of interest is constant. American Economic Review, 67, 478–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, C.R. & Startz, R. 2007. The zero-information-limit condition and spurious inference in weakly identified models. Journal of Econometrics, 138(1), 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newey W. K. & West, K. D. 1987. A simple positive semi-definite heteroske-dasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55, 703–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapach, D. & Wohar, M. 2006. In-sample vs. out-of-sample tests of stock return predictability in the context of data mining. Journal of Empirical Finance, 13, 231–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rytchkov, O. 2008. Filtering out expected dividends and expected returns. Working paper, Fox School of Business and Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stambaugh, R. R 1986. Bias in regressions with lagged stochastic regressors. Working paper, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaman, P. & Stine, R. A., 1988. The bias of autoregressive coefficient estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 842–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, Z., Ma, J. & Wohar, M. 2014. Sources of the stock price fluctuations in Chinese equity market. European Journal of Finance, 20, 829–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weil, P. 1989. The equity premium puzzle and the risk free rate puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 24(3), 401–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, K. 1996. Asymptotic inference about predictive ability. Econometrica, 64(5), 1067–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Jun Ma, Zhenhua Su, and Mark E. Wohar

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ma, J., Su, Z., Wohar, M.E. (2015). The Stock Return Predictability and Stock Price Decomposition in the Chinese Equity Market. In: Cumming, D., Guariglia, A., Hou, W., Lee, E. (eds) Experiences and Challenges in the Development of the Chinese Capital Market. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137454638_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics