Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Bringing Ideational Power into the Paradigm Approach: Critical Perspectives on Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice

  • Chapter
Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice

Part of the book series: Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy ((PEPP))

Abstract

The work of Peter A. Hall (1993) on the role of policy paradigms in public policy is remarkable. Unrivalled by any other publication in ideational scholarship in terms of citations and impact, it — together with the work of scholars like Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith (1993), Kingdon (2003), Baumgartner and Jones (2009), and Stone (1988) — drew on the social learning-tradition (Heclo, 1974) to help bring ideas on the agenda of mainstream political science and policy studies (Béland & Cox, 2013; Blyth, 2013; Daigneault, 2014). With the subsequent important work of what may be termed ‘second generation ideational scholarship’ (e.g. Béland, 2007; Berman, 1998; Blyth, 2002; Campbell, 1997; Campbell & Pedersen, 2001; Cox, 2001; Lieberman, 2002; Schmidt, 2002), ideational frameworks for analyzing policymaking grew into a more or less coherent approach in its own right, what Schmidt (2008) later dubbed ‘discursive institutionalism.’ Hall’s (1993) theory of policy paradigms was essential for the coming of age of the ideational approach because while it placed institutions and interests centrally in its explanatory framework, ideas were the primary factor in accounting for processes of stability and change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adcock, R., Bevir, M., & Stimson, S. C. (2007). Historicizing Historical Institutionalism(s). In R. Adcock, M. Bevir, & S. C. Stimson (Eds.), Modern Political Science: Anglo-American Exchanges since 1880 (pp. 259–89). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A. (2015, forthcoming). Varieties of Economic Crisis, Varieties of Ideational Change: How and Why Macroeconomic Policy and Financial Regulation Differ. New Political Economy, DOI:10.1080/13563467.2014.951431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M., & Duvall, R. (2005). Power in International Politics. International Organization, 59(4), 39–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F. R. (2013). Ideas and Policy Change. Governance, 26(2), 239–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F. R. (2014). Ideas, Paradigms and Confusion. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(3), 475–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. (2009). Agendas and Instability in American Politics (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Béland, D. (2007). Ideas and Institutional Change in Social Security: Conversion, Layering, and Policy Drift. Social Science Quarterly, 88(1), 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béland, D. (2010). The Idea of Power and the Role of Ideas. Political Studies Review, 8(2), 145–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béland, D., & Cox, R. H. (2013). The Politics of Policy Paradigms. Governance, 26(2), 189–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béland, D., & Cox, R. H. (2014). Ideas as Coalition Magnets: Power, Coalition Building and Policy Entrepreneurs. Paper Presented at the Workshop on Ideas, Political Power and Public Policy, June 9–10, Snekkersten, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S. (1998). The Social Democratic Moment: Ideas and Politics in the Making of Interwar Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S. (2013). Ideational Theorizing in the Social Sciences ‘Since Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State’. Governance, 23(6), 217–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bermeo, N., & Pontussen, J. (2012). Coping with Crisis: Government Reactions to the Great Recession. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, M. (1997). Any More Bright Ideas? The Ideational Turn of Comparative Political Economy. Comparative Politics, 29(1), 229–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, M. (2002). Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, M. (2010). Ideas, Uncertainty, and Evolution. In D. Béland & R. H. Cox (Eds.), Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research (pp. 83–101). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, M. (2013). Paradigms and Paradox: The Politics of Economic Ideas in Two Moments of Crisis. Governance, 26(2), 197–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, B. (2015, forthcoming). Preparedness, Crisis Management and Policy Change: The Euro Area at the Critical Juncture of 2008–2013. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, DOI:10.1111/1467-856X.12026.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. (1997). Institutional Analysis and the Role of Ideas in Political Economy. Theory and Society, 27(3), 377–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. (2002). Ideas, Politics and Public Policy. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L., & Pedersen, O. K. (Eds.). (2001). The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L., & Pedersen, O. K. (2014). The National Origins of Policy Ideas: Knowledge Regimes in the United States, France, Germany, and Denmark. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, M. B. (2011a). Ideas Are Not as Stable as Political Scientists Want Them to Be: A Theory of Incremental Ideational Change. Political Studies, 59(3), 596–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, M. B. (2011b). Paradigm Man vs. the Bricoleur: An Alternative Vision of Agency in Ideational Change. European Political Science Review, 3(1), 147–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, M. B. (2013). Projecting from a Fiction: The Case of Financial Crisis in Denmark. New Political Economy, 18(4), 555–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2014). Power through, over and in Ideas: Conceptualizing Ideational Power in Discursive Institutionalism. Paper Presented at the Workshop on Ideas, Political Power and Public Policy, June 9–10, Snekkersten, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashore, B., & Howlett, M. (2009). Punctuating Which Equilibrium? Understanding Thermostatic Policy Dynamics in Pacific Northwest Forestry. American Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 532–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. H. (2001). The Social Construction of an Imperative: Why Welfare Reform Happened in Denmark and The Netherlands but Not in Germany. World Politics, 53(3), 463–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. (2011). The Strange Non-death of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daigneault, P.-M. (2014). Reassessing the Concept of Policy Paradigm: Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Policy Studies. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(3), 453–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2008, October 4). The End of America Inc. Newsweek. Retrieved from http://www.newsweek.com/fukuyama-end-america-inc-91715

  • Hall, P. (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. (2001). The ‘Crisis’ of Keynesianism and the Rise of Neoliberalism in Britain: An Ideational institutionalist Approach. In J. L. Campbell & O. K. Pedersen (Eds.), The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis (pp. 193–218). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. (2011). Pathology Without Crisis? The Strange Demise of the Anglo-Liberal Growth Model. Government and Opposition, 46(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heclo, H. (1974). Modern Social Policies in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helleiner, E. (2014). The Status Quo Crisis: Global Financial Governance after the 2008 Meltdown. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, D., & Berman, E. P. (2014). State of the Art: Do Economists Make Policies? On the Political Effects of Economics. Socio-Economic Review, 12(4), 779–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. (2009, April 10). Socialism Has Failed. Now Capitalism Is Bankrupt. So What Comes Next? The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/apr/10/financial-crisis-capitalism-socialism-alternatives

  • Jacobs, A. M. (2009). How Do Ideas Matter? Mental Models and Attention in German Pension Politics. Comparative Political Studies, 42(2), 252–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A. (2007). Tense Layering and Synthetic Policy Paradigms: The Politics of Health Insurance. Australian Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 579–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, R. C. (2002). Ideas, Institutions and Political Order: Explaining Political Change. American Political Science Review, 96(4), 697–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power (pp. 1–37). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondou, M., Skogstad, G., & Houle, D. (2014). Policy Image Resilience, Multidimensionality, and Policy Image Management: A Study of US Biofuel Policy. Journal of Public Policy, 34(1), 155–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschella, M., & Tsingou, E. (Eds.). (2013). Great Expectations, Small Transformations: Incremental Change in Financial Governance. Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mügge, D. (2013). Resilient Neo-liberalism in European Financial Regulation. In V. A. Schmidt & M. Thatcher (Eds.), Resilient Liberalism in Europe’s Political Economy (pp. 201–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. J., & Pemberton, H. (2004). Learning and Change in 20th-Century British Economic Policy. Governance, 17(3), 415–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orenstein, M. (2013). Pension Privatization: Evolution of a Paradigm. Governance, 26(2), 259–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, C. (2007). How to Map Arguments in Political Science. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Princen, S., & ’t Hart, P. (2014). Putting Policy Paradigms in Their Place. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(3), 470–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salines, M., Glöckler, G., & Truchlewski, Z. (2012). Existential Crisis, Incremental Response: The Eurozone’s Dual Institutional Evolution 2007–2011. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(5), 665–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2002). The Futures of European Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2006). Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2011). Ideas and Discourse in Transformational Political Economic Change in Europe. In G. Skogstad (Ed.), Policy Paradigms, Transnationalism, and Domestic Politics (pp. 36–63). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A., & Thatcher, M. (Eds.). (2013). Resilient Liberalism in Europe’s Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabrooke, L. (2009). Everyday Legitimacy and Institutional Change. In A. Gofas & C. Hay (Eds.), The Role of Ideas in Political Analysis: A Portrait of Contemporary Debates (pp. 167–86). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabrooke, L. (2014). Epistemic Arbitrage: Transnational Professional Knowledge in Action. Journal of Professions and Organization, 1(1), 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogstad, G., & Schmidt, V. A. (2011). Introduction. In Grace Skogstad (Ed.), Policy Paradigms, Transnationalism, and Domestic Politics (pp. 3–35). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (1988). Policy Paradox and Political Reason. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies (pp. 1–39). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surel, Y. (2000). The Role of Cognitive and Normative Frames in Policy-Making. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(4), 495–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsingou, E. (2015). Club Governance and the Making of Global Financial Rules. Review of International Political Economy, 22(2), 225–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widmaier, W. W., Blyth, M., & Seabrooke, L. (2007). Exogenous Shocks or Endogenous Constructions? The Meanings of Wars and Crises. International Studies Quarterly, 51(4), 747–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, M. (2015, forthcoming). Ideas beyond Paradigms: Relative Commensurability and the Case of Canadian Trade-Industrial Policy, 1975–1995. Journal of European Public Policy, DOI:10.1080/13501763.2014.981568

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, M., & Howlett, M. (2014). The Politics of Policy Anomalies: Bricolage and the Hermeneutics of Paradigms. Critical Policy Studies, 8(2), 183–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M. (2015). Puzzling and Powering in Policy Paradigm Shifts: Politicization, Depoliticization and Social Learning. Critical Policy Studies, 9(1), 2–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Martin B. Carstensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dublin Institute of Technology, Ireland

    John Hogan (Lecturer) (Lecturer)

  2. Simon Fraser University, Canada

    Michael Howlett (Professor) (Professor)

Copyright information

© 2015 Martin B. Carstensen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carstensen, M.B. (2015). Bringing Ideational Power into the Paradigm Approach: Critical Perspectives on Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice. In: Hogan, J., Howlett, M. (eds) Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137434043_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation