Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reflections on Our Understanding of Policy Paradigms and Policy Change

  • Chapter
Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice

Part of the book series: Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy ((PEPP))

Abstract

This volume seeks to contribute to the ongoing conversation among policy scholars on the subject of policy paradigms. It provides a window into the research frontier of policy dynamics and a re-evaluation of the precision and utility of existing policy paradigm orthodoxy. A ‘policy paradigm’ constitutes a theoretical tool to specify and understand the guiding principles, or ideas, for creating public policy, why the various actors involved are involved, and why they pursue the strategies they do. The book provides unique and varied insights into the current state of the art regarding how a range of scholars understand such paradigms, and public policy ideas, both conceptually and empirically. It does this by drawing together contributions from leading political science and social science researchers, to provide a multidimensional set of perspectives on how paradigm-related elements such as policy ideas, coalitions, discourses, interests, crises, anomalies and routines contribute to policy development and our understanding of that process. As academics, we are conscious that, by presenting a variety of perspectives in one book, we and our readers can learn from each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andersen, S. S. (1999). European Integration and the Changing Paradigm of Energy Policy: The Case of Natural Gas Liberalization. ARENA Working Papers WP 99/12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F. (2013). Ideas and Policy Change. Governance, 26(2), 239–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F. (2014). Ideas, Paradigms, and Confusions. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(3), 475–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (1991). Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems. Journal of Politics, 53(4), 1044–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béland, D. (2009). Ideas, Institutions, and Policy Change. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(5), 701–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béland, D., & Cox, R. H. (Eds.) (2010). Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S. (2001). Review Article: Ideas, Norms, and Culture in Political Analysis. Comparative Politics, 33(2), 231–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, T. A. (1997). After Disaster; Agenda Setting, Public Policy and Focusing Events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, T. A. (2004). ‘The World Changed Today’: Agenda-Setting and Policy Change in the Wake of the September 11 Terrorist Attacks. Review of Policy Research, 21(2), 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, M. (1997). Moving the Political Middle: Redefining the Boundaries of State Action. The Political Quarterly, 68(3), 217–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, M. (2001). The Transformation of the Swedish Model: Economic Ideas, Distributional Conflict and Institutional Change. World Politics, 54(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, M. (2011). Ideas, Uncertainty and Evolution. In D. Béland & R. Cox (Eds.), Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research (pp. 83–102). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, M. (2013). Paradigms and Paradox: The Politics of Economic Ideas in Two Moments of Crisis. Governance, 26(2), 197–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. (1998). Institutional Analysis and the Role of Ideas in Political Economy. Theory and Society, 27(5), 377–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. (2002). Ideas, Politics, and Public Policy. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capano, G. (2009). Understanding Policy Change as an Epistemological and Theoretical Problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11(1), 7–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, M. (2004). From Common Market to Social Europe?: Paradigm Shift and Institutional Change in European Union Policy on Food, Asbestos and Chemicals, and Gender Equality. Stockholm: Stockholm University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, M. (2011a). Paradigm Man vs. the Bricoleur: Bricolage as an Alternative Vision of Agency in Ideational Change. European Political Science Review, 3(1), 147–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, M. (2011b). Ideas Are Not as Stable as Political Scientists Want Them to Be: A Theory of Incremental Ideational Change. Political Studies, 59(3), 596–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M., March, J., & Olsen, J. (1972). A Garbage Can Model of Organisations choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. H., & Béland, D. (2013). Valence, Policy Ideas, and the Rise of Sustainability. Governance, 26(2), 307–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daigneault, P.-M. (2014). Puzzling about Policy Paradigms: Precision and Progress. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(3), 481–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, P., & Hogan, J. (2012). Understanding Policy Change Using a Critical Junctures Theory in Comparative Context: The Cases of Ireland and Sweden. Policy Studies Journal, 40(2), 324–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. (1994). American Economic Policy in the 1980s. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, G., & Lange, P. (1995). Internationalization, Institutions, and Political Change. International Organization, 49(4), 627–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. M. (2004). When Does Power Listen to Truth? A Constructivist Approach to the Policy Process. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 569–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A. (1989). The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A. (1990). Policy Paradigms, Experts and the State: The Case of Macro-economic Policy Making in Britain. In S. Brooks & A. Gagnon (Eds.), Social Scientists, Policy and the State (pp. 53–78). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policy Making in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A. (2013). Brother, Can You Paradigm. Governance, 26(2), 189–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heclo, H. (1974). Modern Social Policies in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, J. (2006). Remoulding the Critical Junctures Approach. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 39(3), 657–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, J., Donnelly, P. F., & O’Rourke, B. K. (2010). Reflections on Issues in Contemporary Irish Business and Society. In J. Hogan, P. F. Donnelly, & B. K. O’Rourke (Eds.), Irish Business and Society: Reflections on Governing, Participating and Transforming in the 21st Century (pp. 1–27). Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (2010). The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. (2009). Process Sequencing Policy Dynamics: Beyond Homeostasis and Path Dependency. Journal of Public Policy, 29(3), 241–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2009). The Dependent Variable Problem in the Study of Policy Change: Understanding Policy Change as a Methodological Problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11(1), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1990). Democratic Politics and Policy Analysis. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B., & Baumgartner, F. (2005). The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (2009). Trans-Subsystem Dynamics: Policy Topography, Mass Opinion, and Policy Change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 37–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeler, J. (1993). Opening the Window for Reform: Mandates, Crises, and Extraordinary Policy-Making. Comparative Political Studies, 25(4), 433–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, F., Kuzemko, C., & Mitchell, C. (2014). Measuring and Explaining Policy Paradigm Change: The Case of UK Energy Policy. Policy & Politics, 42(2), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleistra, Y., & Mayer, I. (2001). Stability and Flux in Foreign Affairs: Modelling Policy and Organizational Change. Cooperation and Conflict, 36(4), 381–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legro, J. W. (2000). The Transformation of Policy Ideas. American Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 419–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, O., & Steinmo, S. (2010). Taking Evolution Seriously in Political Science. Theory in Biosciences, 12(1), 235–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (Eds.) (2010). Explaining Institutional Change. Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, K. R. (1998). The Currency of Ideas: Monetary Politics in the European Union. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijerink, S. (2005). Understanding Policy Stability and Change: The Interplay of Advocacy Coalitions and Epistemic Communities, Windows of Opportunity, and Dutch Coastal Flooding Policy 1945–2003. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(6), 1060–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintrom, M. (2000). Policy Entrepreneurs and School Choice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy Entrepreneurship and Policy Change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nohrstedt, D. (2011). Shifting Resources and Venues Producing Policy Change in Contested Subsystems: A Case Study of Swedish Signals Intelligence Policy. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 461–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. J., & Pemberton, H. (2004). Learning and Change in 20th-Century British Economic Policy. Governance, 17(3), 415–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Caldentey, E., & Vernengo, M. (2007). Introduction: Ideas, Policies and Economic Development in the Americas. In E. Pérez-Caldentey & M. Vernengo (Eds.), Ideas, Policies and Economic Development in the Americas (pp. 1–8). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Princen, S., & ’t Hart, P. (2014). Putting Policy Paradigms in Their Place. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(3), 470–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Real-Dato, J. (2009). Mechanisms of Policy Change: A Proposal for a Synthetic Explanatory Framework. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11(1), 117–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutland, P. (1994). The Politics of Economic Stagnation in the Soviet Union: The Role of Local Party Organs in Economic Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An Advocacy Coalition Model of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein. Policy Sciences, 21(3), 129–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.) (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogstad, G. (Ed.) (2011). Policy Paradigms, Transnationalism, and Domestic Politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogstad, G. D., & Schmidt, V. A. (2011). Introduction: Policy Paradigms, Transnationalism, and Domestic Politics. In G. D. Skogstad (Ed.), Policy Paradigms, Transnationalism, and Domestic Politics (pp. 3–35). Toronto: Toronto University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond Continuity. Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies (pp. 1–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • True, J. L., Jones, B., & Baumgartner, F. (2007). Punctuated-Equilibrium Theory: Explaining Stability and Change in Public Policy. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 155–88). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Henry, A. D., & de Leon, P. (2011). A Quarter Century of the Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Introduction to the Special Issue. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 349–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir, M., & Skocpol, T. (1985). State Structures and the Possibilities for ‘Keynesian’ Responses to the Great Depression in Sweden, Britain, and the United States. In P. B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, & T. Skocpol (Eds.), Bringing the State Back In (pp. 107–64). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, M., & Howlett, M. (2014). The Politics of Policy Anomalies: Bricolage and the Hermeneutics of Paradigms. Critical Policy Studies, 8(2), 183–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahariadis, N. (1999). Ambiguity, Time, and Multiple Streams. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 73–93). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. John Hogan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Howlett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dublin Institute of Technology, Ireland

    John Hogan (Lecturer) (Lecturer)

  2. Simon Fraser University, Canada

    Michael Howlett (Professor) (Professor)

Copyright information

© 2015 John Hogan and Michael Howlett

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hogan, J., Howlett, M. (2015). Reflections on Our Understanding of Policy Paradigms and Policy Change. In: Hogan, J., Howlett, M. (eds) Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137434043_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation