Skip to main content

Defining Social Enterprise across Different Contexts: A Conceptual Framework Based on Institutional Factors

  • Chapter

Abstract

Over the past several decades the concept of social enterprise has grown dramatically in many regions of the world. Defined as the use of nongovernmental, market-based approaches to address social issues, social enterprise often provides a ‘business’ source of revenue for many types of socially oriented organizations and activities.1 However, within these broad parameters, world regions have come to identify different definitions and concepts with the social enterprise movement in their areas (Kerlin, 2006). This variation has also resulted in considerable debate among researchers and practitioners on how to define the concept (Mair et al., 2006; Light, 2008). To address these difficulties, this research draws on the theory of historical institutionalism to advance understanding of how context influences the development of social enterprise as well as to propose a preliminary conceptual framework for social enterprise that spans regional differences in the term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Austin, J.E. (2006). “Three Avenues for Social Entrepreneurship Research.” In J. Mair, J. Robinson and K. Hockerts (eds), Social Entrepreneurship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnoli, L. and Megali, C. (2011). “Measuring Performance in Social Enterprises.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40(1): 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbetta, G.P., Cima, S., Nereo, Z., Sokolowski, S.W. and Salamon, L.M. (2004). “Italy.” In L. Salamon and S. Sokolowski (eds), Global Civil Society. Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector, vol. 2. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W.J. (1990). “Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive and Destructive.” Journal of Political Economy, 98(5): 893–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borzaga, C. (1996). “Social Cooperatives and Work Integration in Italy.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 67(2): 209–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borzaga, C., & Defourny, J. (Eds.). (2001). The Emergence of Social Enterprise. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borzaga, C. & Santuari, A. (2001). Italy: From traditional co-operatives to innovative social enterprises. In Borzaga, C., & Defourny, J. (Eds.), The Emergence of Social Enterprise (pp. 166–181). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosma, N. and Levie, J. (2010). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2009 Global Report. www.gemconsortium.org/about.aspx?page=pub_gem_global_reports

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, K. (2011). “An Exploratory Study of Social Purpose Business Models in the United States.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1): 185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dacanay, M. (Ed.). (2004). Creating Space in the Market: Social Enterprise Stories in Asia. Makati City, Philippines: Asian Institute of Management and Conference of Asian Foundations and Organizations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. B., Rueschemeyer, D., & Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the State Back in. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, R.H., Hofstede, G., & Bond, M.H. (1991). “Cultural Roots of Economic Performance: A Research Note.” Strategic Management Journal, 12:165–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawell, M., Johannisson, B., & Lundqvist, M. (Eds.) (2009). Entrepreneurship in the Name of Society. Stockholm, Sweden: Knowledge Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, J. (2003). “Comparative Historical Analysis and Knowledge Accumulation in the Study of Revolutions.” In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 41–90). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. E. & Maldonado, M. (2005). “Civil Society in Argentina: Opportunities and Challenges for National and Transnational Organisation.” Journal of Latin American Studies, 37: 141–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerlin, J. A. (2006). Social enterprise in the United States and Europe: Understanding and learning from the differences. Voluntas, 17(3): 247–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerlin, J. A. (Ed.). (2009). Social Enterprise: a Global Comparison. Lebanon, NH: Tufts University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlin, J. A., & Gagnaire, K. (2009). United States. In Kerlin, J. (Ed.), Social Enterprise: a Global Comparison. Lebanon, NH: Tufts University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlin, J. A., & Pollak, T. (2011). “Nonprofit Commercial Revenue: a Replacement for Declining Government Grants and Private Contributions?” American Review of Public Administration, 41(6): 686–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Les, E. and Jeliazkova, M. (2005). “The Social Economy in Central, East and South East Europe.” In The Social Economy as a Tool of Social Innovation and Local Development. Background Report. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levander, U. (2010). “Social Enterprise: Implications of Emerging Institutionalized Constructions.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(2): 213–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levie, J., & Autio, E. (2008). a Theoretical Grounding and Test of the gem Model. Small Business Economics, 31(3): 235–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light, P. C. (2008). The Search for Social Entrepreneurship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, G., & Ko, W. W. (forthcoming). “Organizational learning and marketing capability development: A study of the charity retailing operations of British social enterprise. “Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundstrom, T. and Wijkstrom, F. (1995). “Defining the Nonprofit Sector: Sweden.” Working Papers of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, no. 16. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. (2000). “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society, 29(4), 507–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. (2003). “Knowledge Accumulation in Comparative Historical Research: The Case of Democracy and Authoritarianism.” In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (pp. 131–176). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (Eds.). (2003). Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., Robinson, J., & Hockerts, K. (2006). “Introduction.” In J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship (pp. 1–13). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Masendeke, A., & Mugova, A. (2009). “Zimbabwe and Zambia.” In J. Kerlin (Ed.), Social Enterprise: a Global Comparison (pp. 114–138). Lebanon, NH: Tufts University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. Jr. (1966). Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G. (2006). “Cultivating the Other Invisible Hand of Social Entrepreneurship: Comparative Advantage, Public Policy, and Future Research Priorities.” In A. Nicholls (Ed.), Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Change (pp. 74–95). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NANGO ((Zimbabwe) National Association of Non-Governmental Organisations). (2010). Early Warning System Report Reporting Period October 2009–February 2010, www.nango.org.zw/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=72&Itemi d=265

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. (2006). “Introduction.” In A. Nicholls (Ed.), Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Change (pp. 1–36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyssens, M. (Ed.). (2006). “Social Enterprise: at the Crossroads of Market, Public Policies and Civil Society.” New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyssens. M. (2009). “Western Europe.” In Kerlin, J. (Ed.), Social Enterprise: a Global Comparison. Lebanon, NH: Tufts University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roitter, M., & Vivas, A. (2009). “Argentina.” In J. Kerlin (Ed.), Social Enterprise: a Global Comparison (pp. 139–162). Lebanon, NH: Tufts University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueschemeyer, D. (2009). “Usable Theory: Analytic Tools for Social and Political Research. “Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueschemeyer, D., Stephens, E. H., & Stephens, J.D. (1992). Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i-Martin, X., Blanke, J., Hanouz, M., Geiger, T., & Mia, I. (2009). The Global Competitiveness Index 2009–2010: “Contributing to Long-Term Prosperity Amid the Global Economic Crisis.” In K. Schwab (Ed.), The Global Competitiveness Report 2009–2010. Geneva: World Economic Forum: 3–47, www.weforum.org/pdf/GCR09/GCR20092010fullreport

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i-Martin, X., Blanke, J., Hanouz, M., Geiger, T., & Mia, I. (2010). “The Global Competitiveness Index 2010–2011: Looking beyond the Global Economic Crisis.” In K. Schwab (Ed.), The Global Competitiveness Report 2010–2011. Geneva: World Economic Forum: 3–55, http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2010–11.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. and Sokolowski, S. (2009). “Bringing the ‘Social’ and the ‘Political’ to Civil Society: Social Origins of Civil Society Sectors in 40 Countries.” Paper presented at the 38th Annual Conference of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, November 12–21, Cleveland, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. and Sokolowski, S. (2010). “The Social Origins of Civil Society: Explaining Variations in the Size and Structure of the Global Civil Society Sector.” Paper presented at the 9th International Conference of the International Society for Third Sector Research, July 7–10, Istanbul, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L., Sokolowski, S.W. and Anheier, H.K. (2000). “Social Origins of Civil Society: An Overview.” Working Paper of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, no. 38. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L., Anheier, H., List, R., Toepler, S., Sokolowski, S., & Associates. (2004). Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector, vol. 2. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K. (ed.) (2010). The Global Competitiveness Report 2010–2011. Geneva: World Economic Forum: 3–55), http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2010–11.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (1992). “Why Do Some Countries Invent More Than Others?” Journal of Business Venturing, 7: 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (1993). “Cultural Influences on National Rates of Innovation.” Journal of Business Venturing, 8: 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T. (1973). “A Critical Review of Barrington Moore’s Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy.” Politics and Society, 4(1): 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T. (1979) States and Social Revolutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spear, R., & Bidet, E. (2005). “Social Enterprise for Work Integration in 12 European Countries: a Descriptive Analysis.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 76(2): 195–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squazzoni, F. (2009). “Social Entrepreneurship and Economic Development in Silicon Valley. “Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(5): 869–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryjan, Y. (2001). “Sweden: the Emergence of Work-Integration Social Enterprises.” In Borzaga, C., & Defourny, J. (Eds.), The Emergence of Social Enterprise (pp. 220–235). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryjan, Y. (2004). “Work Integration Social Enterprises in Sweden.” Working Papers Series, no. 04/02, Liège: EMES European Research Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, K. (1999). “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 369–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiessen, J. H. (1997). “Individualism, Collectivism, and Entrepreneurship: a Framework for International Comparative Research.” Journal of Business Venturing, 12: 367–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijkstrom, F. (2000). “Changing Focus Or Changing Role? the Swedish Nonprofit Sector in the 1990s.” German Policy Studies. 1(2): 161–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2008). World Development Indicators. World Bank World Databank accessed at http://databank.worldbank.org/ddp/home.do?Step=12&id=4&CNO=2

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2010). Governance Matters 2010: Worldwide Governance Indicators, 1996–2008. Country Data Reports, http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/pdf/WBI_GovInd.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. (2003). “New Trends in the U.S. Non-profit Sector: Towards Market Integration?” In The Nonprofit Sector in a Changing Economy (pp. 61–77). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Janelle A. Kerlin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kerlin, J.A. (2012). Defining Social Enterprise across Different Contexts: A Conceptual Framework Based on Institutional Factors. In: Gidron, B., Hasenfeld, Y. (eds) Social Enterprises. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137035301_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics