Skip to main content

Korea and the Chinese Tributary System: Will the Past Resemble the Future?

  • Chapter
Korea in the Cross Currents
  • 122 Accesses

Abstract

Traumatic as the Korean war was in mid-century, the Korean peninsula had had a long and bloody history of war with its neighbors. It was the fate of Korea to be located in an area surrounded, as it were, by Russia to the North, China to the West, and Japan to the South. To the East was the Pacific, and North America was 5,000 miles away. So for well over 2,000 years, Korea was dominated by the aspirations of its neighbors. The principal influence came from China, the earliest and greatest civilization in Asia. Korea was absorbed into the Chinese system of international relations, the tributary system, which was designed by the Chinese to keep their neighbors on the borders or on the periphery of their culture and power. Korea was one of the earliest and most loyal participants in this relationship, which shows in significant ways to this day.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See John K. Fairbank, Edwin O. Reischaurer, and Albert M. Craig, East Asia: Tradition and Transformation (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1973), chaps. 11 and 12.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Martine Deuchler, The Confucian Transformation of Korea: A Study of Society and Ideology (Cambridge MA: Harvard University, 1992), pp. 14–27.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kenneth Scott Latourette, The Chinese: Their History and Culture, 3rd revised edition (New York: Macmillan Co., 1946), p. 518.

    Google Scholar 

  4. James Legge, TheChineseClassics, vol. 1,ConfucianAnalaects,TheGreatLearning andDoctrine of theMean (Hong Kong: at the authors; London: Trubner & Co., 1861), 13–27, p. 274.

    Google Scholar 

  5. I am indebted to the late Professor Herlee Creel of the University of Chicago for his courses in Literary Chinese by the Inductive Method, for my life-long interest in literary Chinese and Confucian philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See FungYu-lan, A History of Chinese Philosophy, translated by Derk Bodde (Beijing Henri Vetch, 1937), pp. 73–75.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wu Hung-chu, “China’s Attitude Towards Foreign Nations and Nationals Historically Considered,” Chinese Social and Political Science Review 10 (January 1926), 23.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Frederick Nelson, Korea and the Old Order in Eastern Asia (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1945), p. 89, passim.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T.C. Lin, “Manchuria in the Ming Empire,” Nankei Social and Economic Quarterly, viii, April 1935, pp. 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid., pp. 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lin Mou-sheng, Men and Ideas (New York:The John Day Company, 1942), p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. K. Fairbank and S.Y. Teng, “On the Ch’ing Tributary System,” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies (1941), p. 141.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid., p. 160.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See H. F. MacNair, ed., Modern Chinese History: Selected Readings (Shanghai: Commercial Press, 1927), p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chinese Repository, 20 vols. (Canton, printed for the proprietors, 1835), 3: 417.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid., p. 419.

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. R. Hughes, The Invasion of China by the Western World (London: A. and C. Black, 1937), p. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Frederick Wells Williams, Anson Burlingame and the First Chinese Mission to Foreign Powers (New York: Charles Scribners’ Sons), p. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nelson, Korea and the Old Order in Eastern Asia, xiv.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See Statistical Department of the Inspector General of Customs, Treaties, Regulations etc. between Corea and Other Powers (Shanghai, 1891), pp. 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Harold M.Vinacke, A History of the Far East in Modern Times, 2nd revised ed. (New York: F. S. Crofts, 1937), p. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Alastair Ian Johnston, Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Arthur Waldron, review of Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History, by Alastair Ian Johnston, New Republic, June 22, 1997, 36–41, quote on p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid., p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2001 Robert J. Myers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Myers, R.J. (2001). Korea and the Chinese Tributary System: Will the Past Resemble the Future?. In: Korea in the Cross Currents. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780312299583_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics