Abstract
In the 1980s the world was gradually being alerted to the spreading AIDS virus; infection was high on the list of concerns. In 1988 Lars von Trier, the Danish film-maker who would become famous for his Dogme 95 movie-makers manifesto and for films such as Breaking the Waves (1996), Dancer in the Dark (2000) and Dogville (2003), made an experimental and self-referential film about plague called Epidemic. AIDS is not mentioned in any way, but growing international anxiety about this new infectious disease is the context for the film, as the writers admit in the voice-over to the DVD version. Despite this, Epidemic is primarily notable for a very different reason: its portrayal of the interaction between plague and screen images brings into startling coalescence the question of affect upon cinema spectators, especially spectators confronted with plague, and the role of hypnosis and suggestion within that experience. Even though the gaze is important to film theorists, hypnosis and related phenomena such as suggestion and fascination have been largely forgotten and left to languish among the initial, supposedly naîve responses to film as a new art form. Identification is a key concept for film theory; Sigmund Freud’s work makes a link between identification and hypnosis; but, again, this is not remarked upon much in recent writing. Von Trier’s film explicitly returns to hypnosis, its strange possibilities and its relationship with film, and his work has prompted several critics to re-examine the role of hypnosis in the cinematic experience.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Jack Stevensen (2002) Lars von Trier (London: British Film Institute)
Stig Björkman (ed.) (2003) Trier on von Trier, trans. N. Smith (London: Faber and Faber)
J. Lumholdt (ed.) (2003) Lars von Trier: Interviews (Mississippi: University of Mississippi Press).
Sigmund Freud (1990) ‘Creative Writers and Day-dreaming’, Art and Literature, PFL Vol. 14, ed. and trans. J. Strachey (London: Penguin), p. 138.
C. Bainbridge (2004) ‘Making Waves: Trauma and Ethics in the Work of Lars von Trier’, Journal for Cultural Research, 8.3, p. 356.
C. Bainbridge (2004) ‘The Trauma Debate: Just Looking? Traumatic Affect, Film Form and Spectatorship in the Work of Lars von Trier’, Screen, 45.4, p. 394.
Daniel Defoe (1969) A Journal of the Plague Year, ed. L. Landa (London: Oxford University Press), p. 56.
S. Zizek (1997) The Plague of Fantasies (London and New York: Verso), p. 1.
Francis Petrarch (2002) My Secret Book, trans. J. G. Nichols (London: Hesperus Press Limited), p. 24.
H. Münsterberg (2008) The Photoplay: A Psychological Study (Marston Gate: Hard Press), p. 65.
L. Marcus (2007) The Tenth Muse: Writing about Cinema in the Modernist Period (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 209.
J. Crary (1999) Suspensions of Perception: Attention, Spectacle, and Modern Culture (Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press), p. 66
Siegfried Kracauer (1961) Nature of Film: The Redemption of Physical Reality (London: Denis Dobson), p. 160.
Sigmund Freud (1991) ‘Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego’, Civilization, Society and Religion, PFL Vol. 12, ed. and trans. J. Strachey (London: Penguin), p. 109.
Copyright information
© 2009 Jennifer Cooke
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cooke, J. (2009). Screening Plague Images/Plaguing Screen Images: von Trier’s Epidemic and Hypnosis. In: Legacies of Plague in Literature, Theory and Film. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230235427_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230235427_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30480-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-23542-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)