Skip to main content

Sizing the Military in the Post-Cold War Era

  • Chapter
United States Post-Cold War Defence Interests
  • 52 Accesses

Abstract

Ever since the end of the Cold War, the United States has been struggling to gain consensus on an appropriate force planning methodology concerning the size of its military establishment and answer the question “how much is enough.” The size and posture of the U.S. military was the principal topic of the first Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) and the National Defense Panel’s (NDP) Alternative Force Structure Assessment, and remains an important task for the U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century. The National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2000, which made quadrennial defense reviews a permanent requirement, includes under its first and principal task to the Secretary of Defense a call for a comprehensive discussion of national defense strategy and the force structure best suited to implement that strategy. Consequently, the new administration, and all subsequent “new administrations” must explicitly show their hand at the complex task of force planning.

You cannot make decisions simply by asking yourself whether something might be nice to have. You have to make a judgement on how much is enough.

Robert S. McNamara

April 20, 1963

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  • Paul K. Davis, “Institutionalizing Planning for Adaptiveness,” New Challenges for Defense Planning, p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Les Aspin, National Security in the 1990s: Defining a New Basis for U.S. Military Forces, before the Atlantic Council of the United States, January 6, 1992, pp. 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Les Aspin, An Approach to Sizing American Conventional Forces For the Post-Soviet Era, February 25, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colin L. Powell, “U.S. Forces: Challenges Ahead,” Foreign Affairs, Winter 1992/93, vol. 71, no. 5, p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colin L. Powell, My American Journey (New York: Ballentine Books, 1995), p. 438.

    Google Scholar 

  • General John M. Shalikashvili, CJCS Written Statement to Congress, March 1996, p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd D. Spence, “Statement of Chairman Spence on the Release of the Commission on National Security/21st Century Phase II Report,” Press Release, April 19, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • David Ochmanek, “Planning Under Uncertainty: A User’s Guide to the Post-Cold War World,” Rand – unpublished paper, September 19, 1995, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael E. O’Hanlon, “Rethinking Two War Strategies,” Joint Forces Quarterly (Washington, D.C.: National Defense University, Spring 2000), p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Troxell, J.F. (2004). Sizing the Military in the Post-Cold War Era. In: Magyar, K.P. (eds) United States Post-Cold War Defence Interests. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000834_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics