Abstract
Given the significant role attributed to community organizations by many social capital scholars, it is appropriate to investigate the dynamics of that process. In particular, Woolcock and Narayan (World Bank Res. Obs. 15(2): 225–249, 2000) have suggested that bridging and bonding are two different types of connections, whereby bridging is associated with loose ties across communities and bonding is associated with strong ties within a limited group. This qualitative study explores the loose and strong ties of 39 participants connected through community organizations in rural and urban New South Wales. The results suggest that loose and strong ties are not synonymous with bridging and bonding. In general loose and strong ties differ in degree rather than in kind and people prefer to bridge through their strong ties. The interesting exceptions were ties to professionals, which were highly trusted but defined as loose ties. It is suggested that a model for a high social capital society might be a chain of well-bonded groups each with strong links to some other groups.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Blomkvist, H. (2001). Traditional communities, caste, and democracy: The Indian mystery. In: Dekker, P., and Uslaner, E. (eds.), Social Capital and Politics in Everyday Life, Routledge, London, pp. 73-88.
Burt, R. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Adm. Sci. Q. 42: 339-365.
Burt, R. (1998). The gender of social capital. Ration. Soc. 10(1): 5-42.
Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. 94: 95-120.
De Tocqueville, A. (1961). Democracy in America (originally published 1835), Schoken, New York.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, Free Press, New York.
Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Granovetter, M. (1986). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 91: 481-510.
Hughes, P., Bellamy, J., and Black, A. (1999). Building social trust through education. In: Winter, I. (ed.), Social Capital and Public Policy in Australia,Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne, pp. 225-249.
Leonard, R. (1997). Theorising the relationship between agency and communion. Theory Psychol. 7(6): 823-835.
Newton, K. (1997). Social capital and democracy. Am. Behav. Sci. 40(5): 575-586.
Onyx, J., and Bullen, P. (2000). Measuring social capital in five communities. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 36(1): 23-42.
Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 24: 1-24.
Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon and Schuster, New York.
Simons, R. (1996). A community of freedoms. Aust. Q. 68(1): 31-42.
Swain, A. (2000). Social Capital and Popular Mobilization: Studying Environmental Protests in an Indian State. Unpublished manuscript, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Teorell, J. (2000). A Resource Model of Social Capital: Networks, Recruitment and Political Participa-tion in Sweden. Paper presented to workshop on voluntary associations, social capital and interest mediation, European Consortium for Political Research, Copenhagen, Denmark, April.
Uslaner, E. M. (1997). Faith, Hope and Charity. Unpublished manuscript, University of Maryland–College Park.
White, J., Reedy, E., and Leonard, R. (2001). Addressing Women's Fear of Crime in Public Housing Estates: The Case of Toongabbie. Report (unpublished) to the NSW Council of Social Services.
Woolcock, M., and Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research and policy. World Bank Res. Obs. 15(2): 225-249.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leonard, R., Onyx, J. Networking Through Loose and Strong Ties: An Australian Qualitative Study. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 14, 189–203 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023900111271
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023900111271