Skip to main content
Log in

Davidson's Argument for Monism

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two criticisms of Davidson's argument for monism are presented. The first is that there is no obvious way for the anomalism of the mental to do any work in his argument. Certain implicit premises, on the other hand, entail monism independently of the anomalism of the mental, but they are question-begging. The second criticism is that even if Davidson's argument is sound, the variety of monism that emerges is extremely weak at best. I show that by constructing ontologically ``hybrid'' events that are consistent with the premises and assumptions of Davidson's argument, but entail ontological dualism.

My guess is thatif you want to get a lot of physicalism out [ofDavidson's argument], you're going to have to put a lot of physicalism in.Jerry Fodor 1989, 159

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Chalmers, D.: 1996, The Conscious Mind, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1980, Essays on Actions and Events, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1985, 'Reply to Quine on Events', in E. Lepore and B. McLaughlin (eds.), Actions and Events, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1987, 'Knowing One's Own Mind', Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 60, 441–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1989, 'The Myth of the Subjective', in M. Kransz (ed.), Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1993, 'Thinking Causes', in J. Heil and A. Mele (eds.), Mental Causation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1995, 'Laws and Cause', Dialectica 49, 263–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1999a, 'Reply to Bjørn Ramberg', in L. Hahn (ed.), The Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Open Court, Peru, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1999b, Reply to Bruce Vermazen', in L. Hahn (ed.), The Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Open Court, Peru, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F.: 1995, Naturalizing the Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.: 1989, 'Making Mind Matter More', Philosophical Topics 17, 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M.: 1985, 'Why Having a Mind Matters', in E. Lepore and B. McLaughlin (eds.), Actions and Events, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.: 1998, Mind in a Physical World, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, B.: 1985, 'Anomalous Monism and the Irreducibility of the Mental', in E. Lepore and B. McLaughlin (eds.), Actions and Events, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.: 1985, 'Events and Reification', in E. Lepore and B. McLaughlin (eds.), Actions and Events, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, W.: 1983, 'Supervenience and Psychophysical Law in Anomalous Monism', Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64, 72–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye, M.: 1995, Ten Problems of Consciousness, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Antony, M.V. Davidson's Argument for Monism. Synthese 135, 1–12 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022986117864

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022986117864

Keywords

Navigation