Skip to main content
Log in

Probabilistic Causation in Branching Time

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A probabilistic and counterfactual theory of causality is developed within the framework of branching time. The theory combines ideas developed by James Fetzer, Donald Nute, Patrick Suppes, Ming Xu, John Pollock, David Lewis and Mellor among others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Armstrong, D. M.: 1997, A World of States of Affairs, CambridgeUniversity Press.

  • Belnap, N.: 1992, ‘Branching Space-Time', Synthese 92, 385–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, G. N. and F. J. Pelletier (eds.): 1995, The Generic Book, University of Chicago Press.

  • Cartwright, N.: 1979, ‘Causal Laws and Effective Strategies', Nôus 13, 319–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J. H.: 1976, On Numbers and Games, Academic Press, London, New York and San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1967, ‘Causal Relations', Journal of Philosophy 64, 691–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, W. A.: 1988, ‘Probabilistic Theories of Causation', in J. A. Fetzer (ed.), Probability and Causality, D. Reidel, pp. 133–160.

  • Dowty, D.: 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducasse, C.: 1966, ‘“Cause” and “Condition”’, Journal of Philosophy 63, 238–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eells, E.: 1991, Probabilistic Causality, Cambridge University Press.

  • Fetzer, J.: 1981, Scientific Knowledge, Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. and D. E. Nute: 1979, ‘Syntax, Semantics and Ontology: A Probabilistic Causal Calculus', Synthese 40, 453–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. and D. E. Nute: 1980, ‘A Probabilistic Causal Calculus: Conflicting Conceptions', Synthese 241–246.

  • Giere, R.: 1980, ‘Causal Systems and Statistical Hypotheses', in L. J. Cohen and M. Hesse (eds.), Applications of Inductive Logic, Clarendon Press, pp. 251–270.

  • Gorovitz, S.: 1965, ‘Causal Judgments and Causal Explanations', Journal of Philosophy 62, 695–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1986, ‘Postscript to Causation', in Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 172–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 2000, ‘Causation as Influence', Journal of Philosophy, 182–197.

  • Mackie, J.: 1974, The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J. L.: 1975, ‘Causes and Conditions', in E. Sosa (ed.), Causation and Conditionals, Oxford University Press, pp. 15–38.

  • McCall, S.: 1994, A Model of the Universe: Space-Time, Probability, and Decision, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, M.: 1995, ‘Redundant Causation', British Journal for Philosophy of Science 46, 523–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiland, J. W.: 1974, ‘A Two-Dimensional Passage Model of Time for Time Travel', Philosophical Studies 26, 153–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, D. H.: 1995, The Facts of Causation, Routledge.

  • Menzies, P.: 1989, ‘Probabilistic Causation and Causal Processes: A Critique of Lewis', Philosophy of Science 56, 642–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier, C. A.: 1916, On Causation with a Chapter on Belief, Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S.: 1872, A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive, Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer, eighth edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nute, D.: 1981, ‘Causes, Laws and Law Statements', Synthese 48, 347–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nute, D.: 1991, ‘Historical Necessity and Counterfactuals', Nôus pp. 161–175.

  • Otte, R.: 1981, 'A Critique of Suppes’ Theory of Probabilistic Causation', Synthese 48, 167–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Placek, T.: 2000, ‘Stochastic Outcomes in Branching Space-Time: Analysis of Bell's Theorem', British Journal for Philosophy of Science 445–475.

  • Pollock, J.: 1976, Subjunctive Reasoning, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.: 1959, ‘The Propensity Interpretation of Probability', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10, 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, D. A.: 1978, ‘In Defense of a Probabilistic Theory of Causality', Philosophy of Science 45, 604–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P.: 1970, A Probabilistic Theory of Causality,Vol. XXIV of Acta Philosophica Fennica, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, R.: 1984 and 1986, ‘Combinations of Tense and modality', in D. Gabbay and F. Guenther (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 135–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B. C.: 1981, ‘A Temporal Framework for Conditionals and Chance', in W. Harper (ed.), Ifs: Conditionals, Belief, Decision, Chance and Time, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 323–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Kutschera, F.: 1993, ‘Causation', Journal of Philosophical Logic 22, 563–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Kutschera, F.: 1997, ‘TxW-Completeness', Journal of Philosophical Logic 26, 241–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, M.: 1997, ‘Causation in Branching Time (1): Transitions, Events and Causes', Synthese 112, 137–192.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oksanen, M. Probabilistic Causation in Branching Time. Synthese 132, 89–117 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019622918223

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019622918223

Keywords

Navigation