Skip to main content
Log in

Non-Cooperation In Dialogue Logic

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Aurelius, Marcus: 1944, in A. S. L. Farquharson (ed.), Meditations, 2 volumes, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R.: 1975, The Evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, E. M. and E. C. W. Krabbe: 1982, From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation, de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bench-Capon, T. J. M.: 1990, Knowledge Representation, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B.: 1999,'Approximate Truth: A Paraconsistent Account,’ (unpublished).

  • Carlson, L.: 1983, Dialogue Games: An Approach to Discourse Analysis, Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cawsey, A.: 1990,'A Computational Model of Explanatory Discourse: Local Interactions in a Plan-Based Explanation,’ in N. Luff (ed.), Computers and Conversation, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, F. H. and R. Grootendorst: 1987,'Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective,’ Argumentation 1.

  • Finkelstein, A. and H. Fuks: 1990,'Conversation Analysis and Specification,’ in N. Luff (ed.), Computers and Conversation, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, D. and J. Woods: forthcoming, The Dynamics of Practical Reasoning, forthcoming book.

  • Gabbay, D. and A. Hunter: 1991,'Inconsistency Made Respectable, Part 1,’ in Lecture Notes in AI, Vol. 55, pp. 19-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, D. and J. Woods: 1999,'Ad Baculum is Not a Fallacy,’ in F. H. van Eemeren et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Argumentation, International Society for the Study of Argument, SIC-Sat, 1999, Amsterdam, pp. 221-224.

  • Galton M. and B. Simon (eds): 1980, Progress and Performance in the Primary Classroom, Routledge Kegan-Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girle, R. A.: 1993,'Dialogue and Entrenchment,’ in Proceedings of the Sixth Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Symposium, Fort Lauderdale, pp. 185-189.

  • Girle, R. A.: 1996,'Commands in Dialogue Logic,’ in D. Gabbay and H. J. Ohlbach (eds.), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 246-260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, P.: 1989, Studies in the Ways of Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. and J. Bachman: 1991, What If...?, Mayfield, Mountain View, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, K. J. and P. Thagard: 1995, Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P.: 1990, Introduction to Expert Systems, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, T. A. F.: 1987, What is Closer-to-the-Truth?, Rodopi, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. K.: 1969, Conventions, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, J. D.: 1979,'How to Stop Talking to Tortoises,’ Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic XX, 705-717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, J. D.: 1981,'The Dialectics of Logic,’ Logique et Analyse 94, 159-177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, J. D.: 1985,'No Logic Before Friday,’ Synthese 63, 329-341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, J. D.: 1990,'Four Dialogue Systems,’ Studia Logica LXIX, 567-583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. and D. Hobbs: 1969,'Computational Uses of Philosophical Dialogue Games,’ Informal Logic 18, 131-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1987, Truthlikeness, Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oddie, G.: 1986, Likeness to Truth, Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilkington, R. M.: 1992, Intelligent Help, Communicating With Knowledge Based Systems, Paul Chapman Publishing.

  • Reichman, R.: 1985, Getting Computers to Talk Like You and Me: Discourse Context, Focus, and Semantics (An ATN Model), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich, D. M. and P. Luff: 1990,'Applying the Technology of Conversation to the Technology for Conversation to the Technology for Conversation,’ in N. Luff (ed.), Computers and Conversation, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shriffrin, D.: 1985,'Laurie Carlson: Dialogue Games, An Approach to Discourse Analysis,’ (review article), Language and Society 144, 98-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B.: 1992, Designing the User Interface-Strategies for Effective Computer Interaction, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D. N.: 1985,'New Directions in the Logic of Dialogue,’ Synthese 63, 259-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D. N.: 1995, A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy, The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D. and E. Krabbe: 1995, Commitment in Dialogue. SUNY Press.

  • Woods, J.: 2001, Paradox and Paraconsistency: Conflict Resolution in the Abstract Sciences, to appear.

  • Woods, J. and M. Gabbay: 2000,'Did-Didn't Strategies in Dialogue Logic,’ to appear.

  • Woods, J. and B. Hudak: 1989,'By Parity of Reasoning,’ Informal Logic XI, 125-139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, J., A. Irvine and D. Walton: 2000, Argument: Critical Thinking, Logic and the Fallacies, Prentice-Hall, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, J. and D. Walton: 1982, Argument: The Logic of the Fallacies, McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, S. D.: 1998, Approach to the Truth: Verisimilitude and Truthlikeness, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gabbay, D., Woods, J. Non-Cooperation In Dialogue Logic. Synthese 127, 161–186 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010370420383

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010370420383

Keywords

Navigation