Skip to main content
Log in

Confirming Mathematical Theories: an Ontologically Agnostic Stance

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Quine/Putnam indispensability approach to the confirmation of mathematical theories in recent times has been the subject of significant criticism. In this paper I explore an alternative to the Quine/Putnam indispensability approach. I begin with a van Fraassen-like distinction between accepting the adequacy of a mathematical theory and believing in the truth of a mathematical theory. Finally, I consider the problem of moving from the adequacy of a mathematical theory to its truth. I argue that the prospects for justifying this move are qualitatively worse in mathematics than they are in science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Benacerraf, P. and H. Putnam (eds.): 1983, Philosophy of Mathematics; Selected Readings, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R.: 1984, 'The Current Status of Scientific Realism', in Leplin (1984), pp. 41–82.

  • Boyd, R.: 1985, 'Lex Orandi est Lex Credendi', in Churchland and Hooker (1985), pp. 3–34.

  • Chisholm, R.: 1977, Theory of Knowledge, 2nd edn, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. and C. Hooker (eds.): 1985, Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colyvan, M.: 1998, 'In Defense of Indispensability', Philosophia Mathematica (series III) 6, 39–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, J.: 1808, A New System of Chemical Philosophy, Philosophical Library, New York (1964 edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1975, in P. Benacerraf and H. Putnam (eds.), The Philosophical Basis of Intuitionistic Logic, 1983, pp. 97–129.

  • Dummett, M.: 1977, Elements of Intuitionism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enç, B.: 1986, 'Essentialism without Individual Essences: Causation, Kinds, Superveni-ence, and Restricted Identities', Midwest Studies in Philosophy 11, 403–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H.: 1989, Realism, Mathematics & Modality, Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R.: 1985, QED, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1974, 'Explanation and Scientific Understanding', Journal of Philosophy 72, 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1983, Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, M. and E. Sober: 1994, 'How to Tell when Simpler, More Unified, or Less ad hoc Theories will Provide More Accurate Predictions', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P. and M. Black (eds.), 1970, Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, Blackwell, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glymour, C.: 1980a, 'Explanations, Tests, Unity and Necessity', Noûs 14, 31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glymour, C. 1984, 'Explanation and Realism', in Leplin (1984), pp. 173–192.

  • Herstein, I. N.: 1986, Abstract Algebra, MacMillan Publishing, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwich, P.: 1982, Probability and Evidence, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyburg, H.: 1970, 'Conjunctivitis', in Epistemology and Inference, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leplin, J. (ed.): 1984, Scientific Realism, University of Calfornia Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddy, P.: 1990, Realism in Mathematics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddy, P.: 1992, 'Indispensability and Practice', Journal of Philosophy 89, 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddy, P.: 1998, Naturalism in Mathematics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullin, E.: 1984, 'A Case for Scientific Realism', in Leplin (1984), pp. 8–40.

  • Peressini, A.: 1997, 'Troubles with Indispensability: Applying Pure Mathematics in Physical Theory', Philosophia Mathematica (series III) 5, 210–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peressini, A.: 1999, 'Applying Pure Mathematical Theories', forthcoming in Philosophy of Science 66 (Proceedings).

  • Savage, W.: 1990, Scientific Theories: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 14, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S.: 1991, Foundations without Foundationalism: A Case for Second-Order Logi, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1990, 'Contrastive Empiricism', in Savage (1990), pp. 392–412.

  • Sober, E.: 1993a, 'Epistemology for Empiricists', Midwest Studies in Philosophy 18, 39–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1993b, 'Mathematics and Indispensability', Philosophical Review 102, 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, B.: 1980, The Scientific Image, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vineberg, S.: 1996, 'Confirmation and the Indispensability of Mathematics to Science', PSA 1996 Philosophy of Science 63(Suppl.), 256–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peressini, A. Confirming Mathematical Theories: an Ontologically Agnostic Stance. Synthese 118, 257–277 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005158202218

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005158202218

Keywords

Navigation