Abstract
The Quine/Putnam indispensability approach to the confirmation of mathematical theories in recent times has been the subject of significant criticism. In this paper I explore an alternative to the Quine/Putnam indispensability approach. I begin with a van Fraassen-like distinction between accepting the adequacy of a mathematical theory and believing in the truth of a mathematical theory. Finally, I consider the problem of moving from the adequacy of a mathematical theory to its truth. I argue that the prospects for justifying this move are qualitatively worse in mathematics than they are in science.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Benacerraf, P. and H. Putnam (eds.): 1983, Philosophy of Mathematics; Selected Readings, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Boyd, R.: 1984, 'The Current Status of Scientific Realism', in Leplin (1984), pp. 41–82.
Boyd, R.: 1985, 'Lex Orandi est Lex Credendi', in Churchland and Hooker (1985), pp. 3–34.
Chisholm, R.: 1977, Theory of Knowledge, 2nd edn, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Churchland, P. and C. Hooker (eds.): 1985, Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism, Oxford University Press, New York.
Colyvan, M.: 1998, 'In Defense of Indispensability', Philosophia Mathematica (series III) 6, 39–62.
Dalton, J.: 1808, A New System of Chemical Philosophy, Philosophical Library, New York (1964 edition).
Dummett, M.: 1975, in P. Benacerraf and H. Putnam (eds.), The Philosophical Basis of Intuitionistic Logic, 1983, pp. 97–129.
Dummett, M.: 1977, Elements of Intuitionism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Enç, B.: 1986, 'Essentialism without Individual Essences: Causation, Kinds, Superveni-ence, and Restricted Identities', Midwest Studies in Philosophy 11, 403–426.
Field, H.: 1989, Realism, Mathematics & Modality, Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA.
Feynman, R.: 1985, QED, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Friedman, M.: 1974, 'Explanation and Scientific Understanding', Journal of Philosophy 72, 5–19.
Friedman, M.: 1983, Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Foster, M. and E. Sober: 1994, 'How to Tell when Simpler, More Unified, or Less ad hoc Theories will Provide More Accurate Predictions', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45, 1–35.
Geach, P. and M. Black (eds.), 1970, Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, Blackwell, Cambridge.
Glymour, C.: 1980a, 'Explanations, Tests, Unity and Necessity', Noûs 14, 31–50.
Glymour, C. 1984, 'Explanation and Realism', in Leplin (1984), pp. 173–192.
Herstein, I. N.: 1986, Abstract Algebra, MacMillan Publishing, New York.
Horwich, P.: 1982, Probability and Evidence, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Kyburg, H.: 1970, 'Conjunctivitis', in Epistemology and Inference, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Leplin, J. (ed.): 1984, Scientific Realism, University of Calfornia Press, Berkeley.
Maddy, P.: 1990, Realism in Mathematics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Maddy, P.: 1992, 'Indispensability and Practice', Journal of Philosophy 89, 275–289.
Maddy, P.: 1998, Naturalism in Mathematics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
McMullin, E.: 1984, 'A Case for Scientific Realism', in Leplin (1984), pp. 8–40.
Peressini, A.: 1997, 'Troubles with Indispensability: Applying Pure Mathematics in Physical Theory', Philosophia Mathematica (series III) 5, 210–227.
Peressini, A.: 1999, 'Applying Pure Mathematical Theories', forthcoming in Philosophy of Science 66 (Proceedings).
Savage, W.: 1990, Scientific Theories: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 14, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Shapiro, S.: 1991, Foundations without Foundationalism: A Case for Second-Order Logi, Oxford University Press, New York.
Sober, E.: 1990, 'Contrastive Empiricism', in Savage (1990), pp. 392–412.
Sober, E.: 1993a, 'Epistemology for Empiricists', Midwest Studies in Philosophy 18, 39–61.
Sober, E.: 1993b, 'Mathematics and Indispensability', Philosophical Review 102, 35–57.
Van Fraassen, B.: 1980, The Scientific Image, Oxford University Press, New York.
Vineberg, S.: 1996, 'Confirmation and the Indispensability of Mathematics to Science', PSA 1996 Philosophy of Science 63(Suppl.), 256–263.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peressini, A. Confirming Mathematical Theories: an Ontologically Agnostic Stance. Synthese 118, 257–277 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005158202218
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005158202218