Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Precision Agriculture and Sustainability

  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Precision Agriculture (PA) can help in managing crop production inputs in an environmentally friendly way. By using site-specific knowledge, PA can target rates of fertilizer, seed and chemicals for soil and other conditions. PA substitutes information and knowledge for physical inputs. A literature review indicates PA can contribute in many ways to long-term sustainability of production agriculture, confirming the intuitive idea that PA should reduce environmental loading by applying fertilizers and pesticides only where they are needed, and when they are needed. Precision agriculture benefits to the environment come from more targeted use of inputs that reduce losses from excess applications and from reduction of losses due to nutrient imbalances, weed escapes, insect damage, etc. Other benefits include a reduction in pesticide resistance development. One limitation of the papers reviewed is that only a few actually measured directly environmental indices, such as leaching with the use of soil sensors. Most of them estimated indirectly the environmental benefits by measuring the reduced chemical loading. Results from an on-farm trial in Argentina provide an example of how site-specific information and variable rate application could be used in maintaining profitability while reducing N applications. Results of the sensitivity analysis show that PA is a modestly more profitable alternative than whole field management, for a wide range of restrictions on N application levels. These restrictions might be government regulations or the landowner's understanding of environmental stewardship. In the example, variable rate of N maintains farm profitability even when nitrogen is restricted to less than half of the recommended uniform rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anselin, L. 1988. Spatial Econom?etrics:Methods and Models (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands).

    Google Scholar 

  • American Society of Agronomy (ASA). 1989. Decision Reached on Sustainable Agriculture. Agronomy News. January 1989, p. 15. (ASA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, B. A. and Pautsch, G. R. 1998. Moving form uniform to variable fertilizer rates on Iowa corn: Effects on rates and returns. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 23 (2), 385–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry-Stelljes, K. 2000. New Systems Research Targets Precision Agriculture 's Effectiveness. http:// www. ars. usda. gov/is/AR/archive/oct00/agric l000. pdf. Agricultural Research Service (ARS)Water Quality and Management, an ARS National Program (#201)described on the World Wide Web at http://www. nps. ars. usda. gov/programs/nrsas. htm.

  • Blackmore, B. S., Wheeler, P. N., Morris, J., Morris, R. M. and Jones, R. J. A. 1994. The role of precision farming in sustainable agriculture:A European perspective. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Precision Agriculture edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson. (ASA-CSSA-SSSA. Madison, WI, USA) pp. 773–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongiovanni, R. 2002. A spatial econometric approach to the economics of site-speci c nitrogen management in corn production. Ph. D. Thesis, Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, USA 306 pp. http://www. agriculturadeprecision. org/articulos/analecon. htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongiovanni, R. and Lowenberg-DeBoer, J. 2001. Precision agriculture:Economics of nitrogen management in corn using site-speci c crop response estimates from a spatial regression model. In: Selected Paper:American Agricultural Economists Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, USA 5–8, August 2001. http://agecon. lib. umn. edu/cgi-bin/view. pl.

  • Bonham, J. and Bosch, D. 2001. The value of spatial information in evaluating pollution control policies in agriculture. In: Selected Paper:American Agricultural Economists Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, USA 5–8, August 2001. http://agecon. lib. umn. edu/cgi-bin/view. pl.

  • Caffey, R. H., Kazmierczak, R. F. and Avault, J. W. 2001. Incorporating Multiple Stakeholder Goals into the Development and Use of a Sustainable Index:Consensus Indicators of Aquaculture Sustainability. Department of AgEcon and Agribusiness of Louisiana State University, USA. StaffPaper 2001–8. 40 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpentier, C., Bosch, D. and Batie, S. 1998. Using spatial information to reduce costs of controlling agricultural NPS pollution. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 27, 72–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, S., Heisel, T. and Walter, A. 1996. Patch spraying in cereals. In: Proceedings of the Second International Weed Control Cong (Copenhagen, Denmark).

  • Clay, S., Lems, G., Clay, D., Ellsbury, M. and Forcella, F. 1998. Targeting Precision Agrochemical Applications to Increase Productivity. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson. (ASA-CSSA-SSSA. Madison, WI, USA)pp. 1699–1707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, J. A., Follett, R. F., Buchleiter, G., Stuebe, A., Sparks, R. T., Dillon, M. A., Thompson, A. and Thompson, K. 2001. Use of geospatial information for N management and conservation of underground water quality. The Third International Conference on Geospatial Information in Agriculture and Forestry. 5–7 November 2001, Denver, Colorado, USA (http://www. erim-int. com/CONF/3rdag/ 3rdag. html).

  • English, C. B., Mahajanashetti, S. B. and Roberts, R. K. 1999. Economic and Environmental Bene t of Variable Rate Application of Nitrogen to Corn Fields:Role of Variability and Weather. Selected Paper, American Agricultural Economics Association Meeting, Nashville TN, USA, August 8–11, 1999.

  • Finck, C. 2001. The Root of All Yields. Farm Journal Magazine. July/August 2001. pp. 12–16.

  • Griepentrog, H. W. and Kyhn, M. 2000. Strategies for site speci c fertilization in a highly productive agricultural region. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Precision Agriculture edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson. (ASA-CSSA-SSSA. Madison, WI, USA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, D., Miles, G., Schreiber, M., Mitchell, O. and Vanderbilt, V. 1986. Machine vision and image processing for plant identi cation. Transaction ASAE 29, 1500–1506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggar, R., Stent, C. and Isaac, S. 1983. A prototype hand-held patch sprayer for killing weeds, activated by spectral differences in crop/weed canopies. Journal of Agricultural Engineering and Research 28, 349–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwick, J. 1978. Substitution among exhaustible resources and intergenerational equity. The Review of Economic Studies. XLV-2 140, 347–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, J. 2000. Precision Agriculture and Environmental Quality:Challenges for Research and Education. National Soil Tilth Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Ames, Iowa. Document available at http://www. arborday. org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisel, T., Christensen, S. and Walter, A. 1996. Weed managing model for patch spraying in cereal. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture. edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson. (ASA-CSSA-SSSA. Madison, WI, USA)pp. 999–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hergert, G., Ferguson, R., Gotway, C. and Peterson, T. 1996. The Impact of VRT-N application on N use effciency of furrow irrigated corn. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture. edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson. (ASA-CSSA-SSSA. Madison, WI, USA). pp. 389–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., Cardina, J. and Mortensen, D. 1997. Site-specific weed management:current and future directions. In: The State of Site-Specific Management for Agricultureff edited by F. Pierce and E. Sadler. (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI., USA). Chapter 7, pp. 131–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., Mortensen, D. and Martin, A. 1995. A simulation of herbicide use based on weed spatial distribution. Weed Research. 35, 197–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachanoski, R. G. and Fairchild, G. L. 1996. Field scale fertilizer recommendations:The spatial scaling problem. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 76, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khakural, B., Robert, P. and Koskinen, W. 1994. Runoffand leaching of alachlor under conventional and soil-speci c management. Soil Use and Manage. 10, 158–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khakural, B., Robert, P., Mulla, D., Oliveira, R., Johnson, G. and Koskinen, W. 1998. Site-specific herbicide management for preserving water quality. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Precision Agriculture. edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson. (ASA-CSSA-SSSA. Madison, WI, USA). pp. 1719–1731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen, N., Hughes, D., Sudduth, K. and Birrell, S. 1994. Comparison of variable rate to single nitrogen fertilizer application:corn production and residual soil NO3–N. In:site-specific management for agricultural systems. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Precision Agriculture. edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. and W. E. Larson. (ASA-CSSA-SSSA. Madison, WI, USA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kholsa, R., Shaver, T. M., Reich, R. M. and Gangloff, W. J. 2001. Evaluating Management Zones for Variable Rate Nitrogen Management in Corn. The Third International Conference on Geospatial Information in Agriculture and Forestry. 5-7 November 2001, in Denver, Colorado (http://www. erim-int. com/CONF/3rdag/3rdag. html).

  • Larson, W. and Pierce, F. 1991. Conservation and the Enhancement of Soil Quality. P. 175203. In Evaluation for a Sustainable Land Management H. Pap. Int. in the Developing World. Vol. 2. Tec. Board for Soil Research and Management. Bangkok, Thailand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, W., Lamb, J., Khakural, B., Ferguson, R. and Rehm, G. 1997. Potential of Site-Speci c Management for Nonpoint Environmental Protection. In: The State of Site-Speci c Management for Agricultureff edited by F. Pierce and E. Sadler, (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, 1997), Chapter 15, pp. 337–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiva, F. R., Morris, J. and Blackmore, B. S. 1997. Precision Farming Techniques for Sustainable Agriculture. Proceeding of the 1st European Conference on Precision Agriculture. edited by J. V. Strafford (BIOS Scientific Publishers Oxford, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenberg-DeBoer, J. and Bongiovanni, R. 2001. Spatial Regression Analysis. In: Finck, C. 2001. The Root of All Yields. Farm Journal Magazine. July/August. pp. 12–16.

  • Lowenberg-DeBoer, J. and Swinton, S. 1997. Economics of site-speci c management in agronomic crops. In: The State of Site-Specific Management for Agriculture USA. edited by F. Pierce and E. Sadler, (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), pp. 369–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Aurich, A., Matthes, U. and Osinski, E. 2001. Integrating Sustainability in Agriculture–Trade-offs and Economic Consequences Demonstrated with a Farm Model in Bavaria. Selected Paper:American Agricultural Economists Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, August 5–8, 2001. http:// agecon. lib. umn. edu/cgi-bin/view. pl

  • Midgarden, D., Fleisher, R., Weisz, R. and Smilowitz, Z. 1997. Impact of site-specific IPM on the development of esfenvalerate resistance in Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae)and on densities of natural enemies. Journal Economic Entomology 90, 855–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, D. 1999. Pest Management. Seminar:Precision Agriculture and the Environment. National Academy of Science. As cited by Hatfield (2000) p. 5.

  • Mortensen, D., Johnson, G., Wyse, D. and Martin, A. 1994. Managing spatially variable weed population. In:site-speci c management for agricultural systems. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Precision Agriculture. edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson. (ASA-CSSA-SSSA. Madison, WI, USA) pp. 397–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordmeyer, H., Hausler, A. and Niemann, P. 1997, Patchy Weed Control as an Approach in Precision Farming. In: Precision Agriculture 1997. Proceeding of the 1st European Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by J. V. Stafford (BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford, UK) pp. 307–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, P., Wolf, S., Hartley, H. and McAllister, R. 1993. Final Report:Assessment of 1992 Wiscosin Atrazine Rule (Ag30). College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council). 1993. Soil and Water Quality:an Agenda for Agriculture. National Academy Press, Washington, D. C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oriade, C., King, R., Forcella, F. and Gunsolus, J. 1996. A Bioeconomic analysis of SSM for weed control. Review of Agricultural Economy. 18, 523–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. and Atkinson, G. 1993. Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development. As Indicator of Weak Sustainability. Ecological Economics 8 (3), 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. and Atkinson, G. 1995. Measuring of Sustainable Development. In: D. Bromley ed., The Handbook of Environmental Economics, pp. 166–181.

  • Qiu, Z. and Prato, T. 1999. Integrated economic and environmental assessment of variable rate technology for nitrogen application in corn production. Selected paper presented in the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Nashville, TN, USA, August 8–11, 1999.

  • Redulla, C., Havlin, J., Kluitenberg, G., Zhang, N. and Schrock, M. 1996. Variable N management for improving groundwater quality. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture. edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson. (ASA-CSSA-SSSA. Madison, WI, USA) pp. 1101–1110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejesus, R. M. and Hornbaker, R. H. 1999. Economic and environmental evaluation of alternative pollution-reducing nitrogen management practices in central illinois. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 75, 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R., English, B. and Mahajanashetti, S. 2001. Environmental and economic effects of spatial variability and weather. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Precision Agriculture. edited by S. Blackmore and G. Grenier (AGRO, Montpellier, France). pp. 545–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schepers, J. 1999. Environmental problems facing agriculture. Seminar:Precision Agriculture and the Environment. National Academy of Science. As cited by Hatfield (2000) p. 4.

  • Schnitkey, G. D., Hopkins, J. W. and Tweeten, L. G. 1996. An economic evaluation and precision fertilizer application on corn-soybean fields. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture. edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson. (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI, USA) pp. 977–987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, S. and Jones, P. 1991. Selective application of post-emergence herbicides using photoelectrics. Transactions of the ASAE 34, 1661–1666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. 1974. The Economics of resources or the resources of economics. American Economic Review 64 (2), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, J. and Miller, P. 1996. Spatially variable treatments of weed patches. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture. edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson. (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI, USA), pp. 465–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinton, S. M. 1997. Precision Farming as Green and Competitive. Draft for publication. October 1, 1997, p. 9.

  • Thrikawala, S., Weersink, A., Kachanoski, G. and Fox, G. 1999. “Economic feasibility of variable rate technology for nitrogen on corn”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81, 914–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, L., Reid, J., and Hummel, J. 1999. Development of a precision sprayer for site-speci c weed management. Transactions of the ASAE 42, 893–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermann, C., Gerhards, R., Krohmann, P., Sokefeld, M. and Kuhbauch, W. 2001. The economical and ecological impact of the site-specific weed control. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Precision Agriculture. edited by S. Blackmore and G. Grenier (AGRO Montpellier, France), pp. 563–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Schilfgaarde, J. 1999. Is Precision agriculture sustainable?. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 14 (1), 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D., Prato, T., Qiu, Z., Kitchen, N. and Sudduth, K. 2003. Economic and environmental evaluation of variable rate nitrogen and lime application for claypan soil fields. Precision Agriculture 4, 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, K. B., Yao-chi Lu and Wen-yuan Huang'. 1998. Economic and environmental feasibility of variable rate nitrogen fertilizer application with carryover effects. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 23 (2), 401–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development)1987. Advisory Panel on Food Security, Agriculture, Forestry, and Environment. Food 2000:Global Policies for Sustainable Agriculture. Zed Books, London, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, R., Fleischer, S. and Smilowitz, Z. 1996. Site-specific integrated pest management for high value crops:Impact on potato pest management. Journal of Econ. Entomology 89, 501–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipker, L. and Akridge, J. 2001, “Precision Agricultural Services and Enhanced Seed Dealership Survey Results,” StaffPaper No. 01-8, Center for Agricultural Business, Purdue University, USA July 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, K. M., Davenport, J. R. and Manley, S. R. 2000. Differences in nitrate leaching under variable and conventional nitrogen fertilizer management in irrigated potato systems. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson. (ASA-CSSA-SSSA. Madison, WI, USA).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute for Agricultural Technology (INTA), Manfredi, Córdoba, Argentina

    R. Bongiovanni

  2. Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, 1145 krannert Building, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1145

    J. Lowenberg-Deboer

Authors
  1. R. Bongiovanni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Lowenberg-Deboer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bongiovanni, R., Lowenberg-Deboer, J. Precision Agriculture and Sustainability. Precision Agriculture 5, 359–387 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PRAG.0000040806.39604.aa

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PRAG.0000040806.39604.aa

Search

Navigation