Abstract
There is a clear tendency in contemporary political/legal thought to limit agency to individual agents, thereby denying the existence and relevance of collective moral agency in general, and corporate agency in particular. This tendency is ultimately rooted in two particular forms of individualism – methodological and fictive (abstract) – which have their source in the Enlightenment. Furthermore, the dominant notion of moral agency owes a lot to Kant whose moral/legal philosophy is grounded exclusively on abstract reason and personal autonomy, to the detriment of a due recognition of the socio-historical grounds of moral social conduct.
I shall argue that an adequate theory of responsibility is needed, which does not only take into account individual responsibility, but also collective and corporate responsibility, capable of taking into consideration society and its problems. Furthermore, corporations are consciously and carefully structured organisations with different levels of management and have clearly defined aims and objectives, a central feature upon which I shall be focussing in this paper.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brytting T.: 2000, 'From Institutional Context to Personal Responsibility', Business Ethics-Broadening Perspectives (Peters, Leuven), pp. 89-95.
Clarkson, C. M. V.: 1982, 'Corporate Culpability', Web Journal of Current Legal Issues, 1-16.
Donaldson T.: 1982, Corporations and Morality (Englewood Cliffs-Prentice Hall, New York).
Fisse B. and J. Braithwaite: 1988, 'The Allocation of Responsibility for Corporate Crime: Individualism, Collectivism and Accountability', Sydney Law Review 11, 468-513.
French Peter: 1995, Corporate Ethics (Harcourt Brace College Publishers, London).
French Peter: 1996, 'Corporate Moral Agency', in Patricia Werhane and R. Edward Freeman (eds.), Blackwell Encyclopedic Dictionary of Business Ethics, vol. XI (Blackwell, London), pp. 148-151.
Goodpaster K. and B. Matthews: 1982, 'Can a Corporation have a Conscience?' Harvard Business Review (January-February), 32-41.
Ladd John: 1970, 'Morality and the Ideal of Rationality in Formal Organizations', The Monist (October), 485-501.
Lee Keekok: 1989, Social Philosophy and Ecological Scarcity (Routledge, London).
Lukes, Steven: 1973, Individualism (Basil Blackwell, Oxford).
Novak Michael: 1997, The Fire of Invention: Civil Society and the Future of the Corporation (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc, New York).
Pheby, Keith: 1997, 'The Psychological Contract: Enacting Ethico-power', in Peter W. F. Davies (ed.), Current Issues in Business Ethics (Routledge, London).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Soares, C. Corporate Versus Individual Moral Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 46, 143–150 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025061632660
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025061632660