Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Polychaetes as surrogates for marine biodiversity: lower taxonomic resolution and indicator groups

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to conservation needs, reliable rapid-assessment methods for mapping of biodiversity are needed. One approach is to use surrogates, i.e. quantities that correlate strongly with the number of species, but are easier to obtain. The purpose of this paper is to test two polychaete surrogates, one for higher taxa and one for indicator groups, that will facilitate prediction of species richness in marine soft-bottom communities. Soft sediment is an important habitat which covers most of the ocean bottom. Data on polychaetes from the North Atlantic were used since polychaetes are often numerically dominant in the benthic assemblages, both with regard to the number of species and their abundance. In the polychaete assemblages along the Norwegian coast, richness at the genus, family and order level were significantly, linearly correlated to total species richness (r≥ 0.92). Polychaetes in the order Terebellida were found to be a good indicator of polychaete species richness and to a lesser extent also of whole benthic assemblages. The group Terebellida is potentially well suited as an indicator group, since it contains long-lived, large species that are easy to sort from the sediment and it is well defined taxonomically. Although promising as proxies for species richness in marine biodiversity studies, the use of lower taxonomic resolution and indicator groups requires further investigations in more local areas where there are conservation issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beattie A.J. and Oliver I. 1994. Taxonomic minimalism. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 488–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beccaloni G.W. and Gaston K.J. 1995. Predicting the species richness of neotropical forest butterflies - Ithomiinae (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) as indicators. Biological Conservation 71: 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belbin L. 1993. Environmental representativeness - regional partitioning and reserve selection. Biological Conservation 66: 223–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birks H.J.B. 1996. Statistical approaches to interpreting diversity patterns in the Norwegian mountain flora. Ecography 19: 332–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brattegard T. and Holthe T. 1997. Distribution of Marine, Benthic Macro-Organisms in Norway. Directorate for Nature Management, Trondheim, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell R.K. and Coddington J.A. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences 345: 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich P.R. 1992. Population biology of checkerspot butterflies and the preservation of global biodiversity. Oikos 63: 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith D.P. and Walker P.A. 1996. Environmental diversity: on the best-possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areas. Biodiversity and Conservation 5: 399–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauchald K. and Jumars P.A. 1979. The diet of worms: a study of polychaete feeding guilds. Oceanography and Marine Biological Annual Review 17: 193–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro S.P. and Cole F.A. 1995. Taxonomic level sufficient for assessing pollution impacts on the southern California Bight macrobenthos - revisited. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 14: 1031–1040.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston K.J. 1994. Biodiversity measurement. Progress in Physical Geography 18: 565–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston K.J. 1996. Species richness: measure and measurement. In: Gaston K.J. (ed.), Biodiversity: A Biology of Numbers and Difference. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, pp. 77–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston K.J. 2000. Biodiversity: higher taxon richness. Progress in Physical Geography 24: 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston K.J. and Williams P.H. 1993. Mapping the world's species - the highest taxon approach. Biodiversity Letters 1: 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee J.M. and Warwick R.M. 1996. A study of global biodiversity patterns in the marine motile fauna of hard substrata. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 76: 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray J.S. 1997. Marine biodiversity: patterns, threats and conservation needs. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 153–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray J.S., Clarke K.R., Warwick R.M. and Hobbs G. 1990. Detection of initial effects of pollution on marine benthos: an example from the Ekofisk and Eldfisk oilfields, North Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 66: 285–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann-Schröder G. 1996. Annelida, Borstenwürmer, Polychaeta. Gustav Fisher Verlag, Jena, Germany. Holthe T. 1978. The zoogeography of the Terebollomorpha (Polychaeta) of the northern European waters. Sarsia 63: 191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holthe T. 1986. Polychaeta Terebellomorpha. Marine Invertebrates of Scandinavia 7: 1–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howson C.M. 1987. Species Directory to British Marine Fauna and Flora. Marine Conservation Society, Ross-on-Wye, Herefordshire, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings P. 1998. Biodiversity and functioning of polychaetes in benthic sediments. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 1133–1145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irish K.E. and Norse E.A. 1996. Scant emphasis on marine biodiversity. Conservation Biology 10: 680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie A.S.Y., Oliver P.G. and Rees I.S. 1995. Benthic Biodiversity in the southern Irish Sea. Studies in Marine Biodiversity and Systematics from the National Museum of Wales. BIOMÔR Reports No. 1. National Museums & Galleries of Wales, Cardiff, Wales, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie A.S.Y., Parmiter C. and Tong L.K.Y. 1997. Distribution and diversity of Polychaeta in the southern Irish Sea. Bulletin of Marine Science 60: 467–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • May R.M. 1990. Taxonomy as destiny. Nature 347: 129–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • May R.M. 1994. Biological diversity - differences between land and sea. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences 343: 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss R.F. 1990. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conservation Biology 4: 355–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsgård F. 1995. Overvaking av forurensingssituasjonen i indre Oslofjord. Undersøkelser av bløtbunnsfauna 1993. SFT-rapport 622/95, pp. 1–106.

  • Olsgard F. and Somerfield P.J. 2000. Surrogates in marine benthic investigations - which taxonomic unit to target? Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress and Recovery 42: 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsgard F., Somerfield P.J. and Carr M.R. 1997. Relationships between taxonomic resolution and data transformations in analyses of a macrobenthic community along an established pollution gradient. Marine Ecology Progress Series 149: 173–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsgard F., Somerfield P.J. and Carr M.R. 1998. Relationships between taxonomic resolution, macrobenthic community patterns and disturbance. Marine Ecology Progress Series 172: 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson D.L. 1994. Selecting indicator taxa for the quantitative assessment of biodiversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences 345: 75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pocklington P. and Wells P.G. 1992. Polychaetes. Key taxa for marine environmental quality monitoring. Marine Pollution Bulletin 24: 593–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast J.R. and Eversham B.C. 1997. Species richness covariance in higher taxa: empirical tests of the biodiversity indicator concept. Ecography 20: 210–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast J.R., Quinn R.M., Lawton J.H., Eversham B.C. and Gibbons D.W. 1993. Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365: 335–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray G.C. and Grassle J.F. 1991. Marine biological diversity. Bioscience 41: 453–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy K., Jablonski D. and Valentine J.W. 1996. Higher taxa in biodiversity studies: patterns from eastern Pacific marine molluscs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences 351: 1605–1613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sepkoski J.J. 1991. Diversity in the Phanerozoic oceans: a partisan review. In: Dudley E.C. (ed.), The Unity of Evolutionary Biology. Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology. Diosorides Press, Portland, Oregon, pp. 210–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerfield P.J. and Clarke K.R. 1995. Taxonomic levels, in marine community studies, revisited. Marine Ecology Progress Series 127: 113–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine J.W. 1970. How many marine fossil species? A new approximation. Journal of Paleontology 44: 410–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderklift M.A., Ward T.J. and Jacoby C.A. 1996. Effect of reducing taxonomic resolution on ordinations to detect pollution-induced gradients in macrobenthic infaunal assemblages. Marine Ecology Progress Series 136: 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderklift M.A., Ward T.J. and Phillips J.C. 1998. Use of assemblages derived from different taxonomic levels to select areas for conserving marine biodiversity. Biological Conservation 86: 307–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright R.I., Humphries C.J. and Williams P.H. 1991. What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice. Biological Conservation 55: 235–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward T.J., Kenchington R.A., Faith D.P. and Margules C.R. 1998. Marine BioRap Guidelines: Rapid Assessment of Marine Biological Diversity. CSIRO, Perth, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward T.J., Vanderklift M.A., Nicholls A.O. and Kenchington R.A. 1999. Selecting marine reserves using habitats and species assemblages as surrogates for biological diversity. Ecological Applications 9: 691–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick R.M. 1988. Analysis of community attributes of the macrobenthos of Frierfjord /Langesundfjord at taxonomic levels higher than species. Marine Ecology Progress Series 46: 167–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H. and Gaston K.J. 1994. Measuring more of biodiversity - can higher-taxon richness predict wholesale species richness? Biological Conservation 67: 211–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H., Gaston K.J. and Humphries C.J. 1997. Mapping biodiversity value worldwide: combining higher-taxon richness from different groups. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences 264: 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward L. 1987. Climate and Plant Distribution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Frode Olsgard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Torleiv Brattegard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Torleif Holthe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olsgard, F., Brattegard, T. & Holthe, T. Polychaetes as surrogates for marine biodiversity: lower taxonomic resolution and indicator groups. Biodiversity and Conservation 12, 1033–1049 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022800405253

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022800405253

Search

Navigation