Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to investigate auditory stimulus feature processing and how neural generators might differ among the mismatch negativity (MMN) responses to intensity, frequency, and duration deviant stimuli. Data collected from 72 electrodes in twelve adult female subjects were analyzed. For each subject, peak amplitude and latency values at Fz were compared among responses to the three deviant stimulus types presented in individual conditions with a probability of 0.10 and 0.30, and in the multiple deviant condition in which all three deviant types were presented (design based on Deacon et al. 1998). Further, equivalent current dipoles (ECD) for each deviant type, in each condition, and for each subject were calculated in three areas: right hemisphere, left hemisphere, and frontal. Peak amplitude and latency measured at Fz were consistent with previous findings by Deacon et al. (1998) and suggested parallel processing, perhaps by separate neural generators. However, ECD locations were not significantly different among the responses to the different deviant types. Further, the ECD magnitudes did not consistently reflect the differences in amplitude observed at the scalp among responses to the deviant types and conditions. The latter finding may indicate that the procedures were not sensitive enough to identify true differences among the generators. Alternatively, it was suggested that searching for separate neural generators at the cortical level may be too restrictive because the process may begin in subcortical areas, as indicated in animal models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaltonen, O., Eerola, O., Lang, A.H., Uusipaikka, E. and Tuomainen, J. Automatic discrimination of phonetically relevant and irrelevant vowel parameters as reflected by mismatch negativity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1994, 96(3): 1489-1493.
Alho, K. Cerebral generators of mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic counterpart (MMNm) elicited by sound changes. Ear Hear., 1995, 16(1): 38-51.
American National Standards Institute. Specification for audiometers. Acoustic Society of America, New York, NY, 1996.
Barrett, K.A. and Fulfs, J.M. Effect of gender on the mismatch negativity auditory evoked potential. J. Am. Acad. Audiol., 1998, 9: 444-451.
Chertoff, M.E., Goldstein, R. and Mease, M.R. Early event-related potentials with passive subject participation. J. Speech Hear. Res., 1988, 31: 460-465.
Csépe, V. On the origin and development of the mismatch negativity. Ear Hear., 1995, 16(1): 91-104.
Deacon, D., Nousak, J.M., Pilotti, M., Ritter, W. and Yang, C. Automatic change detection: Does the auditory system use representations of individual stimulus features or gestalts? Psychophysiology, 1998, 35: 413-419.
Frodl-Bauch, T., Kathmann, N., Möller, H.-J. and Hegerl, U. Dipole localization and test-retest reliability of frequency and duration mismatch negativity generator processes. Brain Topography, 1997, 10(1): 3-8.
Giard, M.H., Perrin, F., Pernier, J. and Bouchet, P. Brain generators implicated in the processing of auditory stimulus deviance: A topographic event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 1990, 27(6): 627-640.
Giard, M.H., Lavikainen, J., Reinikainen, K., Perrin, F., Bertrand, O., Pernier, J. and Näätänen, R. Separate representation of stimulus frequency, intensity, and duration in auditory sensory memory: An event-related potential and dipole model analysis. J. Cogn. Neurosci., 1995, 7(2): 133-143.
Gomes, H., Bernstein, R., Ritter, W., Vaughan, Jr. H. G. and Miller, J. Storage of feature conjunctions in transient auditory memory. Psychophysiology, 1997, 34: 712-716.
Jaramillo, M., Paavilainen, P. and Näätänen, R. Mismatch negativity and behavioural discrimination in humans as a function of the magnitude of change in sound duration. Neurosci. Lett., 2000, 290: 101-104.
Javitt, D.C., Grochowski, S., Shelley, A.M. and Ritter, W. Impaired mismatch negativity (MMN) generation in schizophrenia as a function of stimulus deviance, probability, and interstimulus/interdeviant interval. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1998, 108: 143-153.
Joutsiniemi, S.-L., Ilvonen, T., Sinkkonen, J., Huotilainen, M., Tervaniemi, M., Lehtokoski, A., Rinne, T. and Näätänen, R. The mismatch negativity for duration decrement of auditory stimuli in healthy subjects. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1998, 108: 154-159.
Kirk, R.E. Experimental Design, Second Edition. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., Monterey, CA, 1982.
Kraus, N., McGee, T., Sharma, A., Carrell, T. and Nicol, T. Mismatch negativity event-related potential elicited by speech stimuli. Ear Hear., 1992, 13(3): 158-164.
Kraus, N., Micco, A.G., Koch, D.B., McGee, T., Carrell, T., Sharma, A., Wiet, R.J. and Weingarten, C.Z. The mismatch negativity cortical evoked potential elicited by speech in cochlear-implant users. Hear. Res., 1993, 65: 118-124.
Kraus, N., McGee, T., Carrell, T., King, C., Littman, T. and Nicol, T. Discrimination of speech-like contrasts in the auditory thalamus and cortex. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1994, 96(5): 2758-2768.
Kraus, N., McGee, T., Carrell, T.D., King, C., Tremblay, K. and Nicol, T. Central auditory system plasticity associated with speech discrimination training. J. Cogn. Neurosci., 1995, 7(1): 25-32.
Kulynych, J.J., Vladar, K., Jones, D.W. and Weinberger, D.R. Gender differences in the normal lateralization of the supratemporal cortex: MRI surface-rendering morphometry of Heschl's gyrus and the planum temporale. Cereb. Cortex, 1994, 4: 107-118.
Levänen, S., Hari, R., McEvoy, L. and Sams, M. Responses of the human auditory cortex to changes in one versus two stimulus features. Exp. Brain Res., 1993, 97: 177-183.
Levänen, S., Ahonen, A., Hari, R., McEvoy, L. and Sams, M. Deviant auditory stimuli activate human left and right auditory cortex differently. Cerebral Cortex, 1996, 6: 288-296.
Matesich, J. and Branch, E. DL for Windows [computer program]. Version 2.0. Memphis (TN): The University of Memphis, 1999.
Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A.W.K. and Mäntysalo, S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta. Psychol., 1978, 42: 313-329.
Näätänen, R. and Michie, P.T. Early selective-attention effects on the evoked potential: Acritical review and reinterpretation. Biol. Psychol., 1979, 8: 81-136.
Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K. and Sams, M. Do event-related potentials reveal the mechanism of the auditory sensory memory in the human brain? Neurosci. Lett., 1989a, 98: 217-221.
Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P. and Reinikainen, K. Do event-related potentials to infrequent decrements in duration of auditory stimuli demonstrate a memory trace in man? Neurosci. Lett., 1989b, 107: 347-352.
Näätänen, R. Attention and brain function. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ, 1992.
Neurosoft, Inc. STIM [computer program]. Version 2.4.13. Sterling (VA): Neurosoft, Inc., 1998.
Neurosoft, Inc. SCAN [computer program]. Version 4.0.33. Sterling (VA): Neurosoft, Inc., 1999.
Northern, J.L. and Downs, M.L. Hearing in children. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1991.
Nousak, J.K., Deacon, D., Ritter, W. and Vaughan Jr., H.G. Storage of information in transient auditory memory. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res., 1996, 4: 305-317.
Oldfield, R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 1971, 9: 97-113.
Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K., Sams, M. and Näätänen, R. Right hemisphere dominance of different mismatch negativities. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 78: 466-479.
Pascual-Marqui, R.D., Michel, C.M. and Lehmann, D. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: A new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int. J. Psychophysiol., 1994, 18: 49-65.
Penhune, V.B., Zatorre, R.J., MacDonald, J.D., and Evans, A.C. Interhemispheric anatomical differences in human primary auditory cortex: Probabilistic mapping and volume measurement from magnetic resonance scans. Cereb. Cortex, 1996, 6: 661-672.
Petty, R.G., Barta, P.E., Pearlson, G.D., McGilchrist, I.K., Lewis, R.W., Tien, A.Y., Pulver, A., Vaughn, D.D., Casanova, M.F. and Powers, R.E. Reversal of asymmetry of the planum temporale in schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry, 1995, 152(5): 715-721.
Picton, T.W., Alain, C., Otten, L., Ritter, W. and Achim, A. Mismatch negativity: Different water in the same river. Audiol. Neurootol., 2000, 5: 111-139.
Rinne, T., Alho, K., Ilmoniemi, R.J., Virtanen, J. and Näätänen, R. Separate time behaviors of the temporal and frontal mismatch negativity sources. NeuroImage, 2000, 12: 14-19.
Ritter, W., Deacon, D., Gomes, H., Javitt, D.C. and Vaughan, Jr., H.G. The mismatch negativity of event-related potentials as a probe of transient auditory memory: A review. Ear Hear., 1995, 16(1): 52-67.
Sams, M., Kaukoranta, E., Hämäläinen, M. and Näätänen, R. Cortical activity elicited by changes in auditory stimuli: Different sources for the magnetic N100m and mismatch responses. Psychophysiology, 1991, 28(1): 21-29.
Scherg, M. and vonCramon, D. Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1985, 62: 32-44.
Scherg, M., Vajsar, J. and Picton, T.W. A source analysis of the late human auditory evoked potentials. J. Cogn. Neurosci., 1989, 1: 336-355.
Source Signal Imaging, Inc. EMSE Suite User Manual. San Diego, CA: Source Signal Imaging, Inc., 1998a.
Source Signal Imaging, Inc. LOCATOR [computer program]. Version 4.1. San Diego, CA: Source Signal Imaging, Inc., 1998b.
Source Signal Imaging, Inc. EMSE [computer program]. Version 4.2. San Diego, CA, Source Signal Imaging, Inc., 1999.
Sussman, E., Gomes, H., Nousak, J.M.K., Ritter, W. and Vaughan, Jr., H.G. Feature conjunctions and auditory sensory memory.Brain Res., 1998, 793: 95-102.
Takegata, R., Paavilainen, P., Näätänen, R. and Winkler, I. Independent processing of changes in auditory single features and feature conjunctions in humans as indexed by the mismatch negativity. Neurosci. Lett., 1999, 266: 109-112.
Taylor, M.M. and Creelman, C.D. PEST: Efficient estimates on probability functions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1967, 41: 782-787.
Tiitinen, H., May, P., Reinikainen, K. and Näätänen, R. Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature, 1994, 372: 90-92.
Walter, W.G., Cooper, R., Aldridge. V.J., McCallum, W.C. and Winter, A.L. Contingent negative variation: An electric sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in man. Nature, 1964, 203: 380-384.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schairer, K.S., Gould, H.J. & Pousson, M.A. Source Generators of Mismatch Negativity to Multiple Deviant Stimulus Types. Brain Topogr 14, 117–130 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012992829580
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012992829580