Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Strong motion envelope modelling of the source of the Chamoli earthquake of March 28, 1999 in the Garhwal Himalaya, India

  • Published:
Journal of Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Garhwal Himalaya has been rocked by two major earthquakes in the span of just eight years, viz. Uttarkashi earthquake of 20th Oct, 1991 and Chamoli earthquake of 28th March, 1999. Chamoli earthquake of March 28, 1999 was recorded at 11 different stations of a strong motion array installed in the epicentral region. The maximum peak ground acceleration (353 cm/s2) was recorded at an accelerograph located at Gopeshwar. The data from eleven stations has been used for comparison with the simulated acceleration envelopes due to a model of the rupture responsible for this earthquake. For simulation of acceleration envelope the method of Midorikawa (1993) has been modified for its applicability to Himalayan region. This method has earlier been used by Joshi and Patel (1997) and Joshi (1999) for the studyof Uttarkashi earthquake of 20th Oct, 1991. The same method has been used for study of Chamoli earthquake. Layered earth crust has been introduced in place of homogeneous one in this method. The model of rupture is placed at a depth of 12 km below the Munsiari thrust for modelling Chamoli earthquake. Peak ground acceleration was calculated from simulated acceleration envelope using layered as well as homogeneous earth crust. For the rupture placed in a layered crust model peak ground acceleration of order 312 cm/s2 was simulated at Gopeshwar which is quite close to actually recorded value. The comparison of peak ground acceleration values in terms of root mean square error at eleven stations suggests that the root mean square error is reduced by inclusion of a layered earth crust in place of homogeneous earth crust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson, N.A. and Litehiser, J.J., 1989, Attenuation of vertical peak acceleration, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 79, 549–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Araya, R. and Kiureghiann, A.D., 1988, Seismic hazard analysis: improved models, uncertainties and sensitivities, Report no. EERC,90/11, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, C.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore, D.M., 1983, Stochastic simulation of high frequency ground motion based on seismological models of radiated spectra, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 73, 1865–1894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore, D.M. and Joyner, W.B., 1991, Estimation of Ground Motion at Deep Soil Sites in eastern north America, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 81, 2167–2185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore, D.M., Joyner, W.B., Oliver, A.A. and Page, R.A., 1980, Peak acceleration, velocity and displacement from strong motion records, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 70, 305–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K.W., 1981, Near source attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 71, 2039–2070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocco, M. and Boatwright, J., 1993, The envelope of acceleration time histories, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 83(4), 1095–1114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran, A.R. and Das, J.D., 1992, Analysis of strong ground motion accelerogram of Uttarkashi Earthquake of October 20, 1991, Bull. Indian Soc. of Earthquake Tech. 29, 35–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran, A.R. and Das, J.D., 1991, Analysis of strong ground motion accelerograms of Uttarkashi Earthquake of October 20, 1991, Report No. EQ 91-10, Department of Earthquake Engineering, University of Roorkee, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coats, D.A., Kanamori, H. and Houston, H., 1984, Simulation of strong ground motion from the 1964 Alaskan earthquake (abs), Earthquake Notes 55, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dziewonski, A.M., Ekstrom, G. and Saganik, M.P., 1992, Centroid moment tensor solution for October Dec 1991, Phys. Earth and Planetary Inter. 74, 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteva, L. and Rosenblueth, E., 1964, Espectros De temblores a distancias moderadas y grandes, Bo. Society Mex. Ing. Sism. 2, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell, S.H., 1978. Earthquake aftershocks as green functions, Geophys. Res. Lett. 5, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell, S.H., 1982, Simulation of ground accelerations for May 1980 Mammoth Lakes, California earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 72, 2381–2387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, D.M. and Helmberger, D.V., 1980, Simulation of strong ground motions, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 70, 617–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, T.C. and McGuire, R.K., 1981, Character of high frequency ground motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 71, 2071–2095.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisada, T. and Ando, H., 1976, Relation between duration of earthquake ground motion and magnitude, Kajima Istitute of construction technology report.

  • Housner, G.W. and Jennings, P.C., 1964, Generation of Artificial earthquakes, Proc. ASCE 90, 113–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, H. and Kanamori, H., 1984, The effect of asperities on short period seismic radiation with application on rupture process and strong motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 76, 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, L., 1985, Modelling earthquakes with empirical green's functions (abs), Earthquake Notes 56, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imagawa, K., Mikami, N. and Mikumo, T., 1984, Analytical and semi empirical synthesis of near field seismic waveforms for investigating the rupture mechanism of major earthquakes, J. Physics of Earth 32, 317–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irikura, K., 1986, Prediction of strong acceleration motion using empirical Green's function, Proceedings of 7th Japan earthquake engineering sym, 151–156.

  • Irikura, K. and Muramatu, I., 1982, Synthesis of strong ground motions from large earthquakes using observed seismograms of small events, Proceedings of 3rd International Microzonation Conference, Seattle, 447–458.

  • Jain, A.K. and Chander, R., 1995, Geodynamic models for Uttarkashi earthquake of October 20, 1991, Uttarkashi Earthquake, Geological Society of India, 225–233.

  • Joshi, A., 1994, Strong motion modelling of rupture plane along an identified probable causative fault, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Roorkee, Roorkee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A., 1997, Modelling of peak ground acceleration for Uttarkashi earthquake of 20th October, 1991, Bull. Ind Soc. Earthquake Tech. 34, 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A. and Patel, R.C., 1997, Modelling of active lineaments for predicting possible earthquake scenario around Dehradun, Garhwal Himalaya, India, Tectonophysics 283, 289–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A., 1998, Study of the Uttarkashi earthquake in terms of rupture model and isoseismals, J. Geophysics 19, 133–140. 517

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A. and Kumar, B., 1999, Generation of synthetic accelerograms, by modelling of rupture plane, J. Indian Soc. Earthq. Tech. (Accepted).

  • Joyner, W.B. and Boore, D.M., 1981, Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial valley, California earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am 71, 2011–2038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakehi, Y. and Irikura, K., 1996, Estimation of high frequency wave radiation areas on the fault plane by the envelope inversion of acceleration seismogram, Geophys. J. Int. 125, 892–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakehi, Y. and Irikura, K., 1997, High frequency radiation process during earthquake faulting-envelope inversion of acceleration seismograms from the 1993 Hokkaido – Nansei – Oki, Japan earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 87, 904–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kameda, H. and Sugito, M., 1978, Prediction of strong earthquake motions by evolutionary process model, Proceedings of 6th Japan earthquake engineering Symp, 41–48.

  • Kanamori, H., 1979, A semi empirical approach to prediction of long period ground motions from great earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 69, 1645–1670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayal, J.R., 1994, Long term seismicity, foreshocks and aftershocks of the Uttarkashi earthquake – October 20, 1991 at Garhwal Himalaya, Abst in: Group discussion on 'Geological hazards in Himalayan region: Assessment and mitigation, Dehradun, 17–18.

  • Kayal, J.R., Kamble, V.P. and Rostogi, B.K., 1992, Aftershock sequence of Uttarkashi earthquake October 20, 1991, Geological Society of India Special Publication 30, 203–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayal, J.R., Nath, S.K., Goswami, Roy, S., Ram, S. and Srirama, B.V., 1999, Site response study by shear wave spectral analysis using the 1999 Chamoli earthquake sequence in Garhwal Himalaya, Workshop on Chamoli earthquake and its impact, Department of Science and Technology, India.

  • Kennedy, R.P., Short, S.A., Kipp, T.R., Banon, H., Tokarz, F.J. and Merz, K.L., 1984, Engineering characterization of ground motion-task I: Effects of characteristics of free field motion on structural response, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rept. NUREG/CR-3805.

  • Khattri, K.N., 1998, Simulation of earthquake strong ground motion for seismic hazard estimation, National Seminar on Recent Advances in Seismology, pp. 20 (Abstract published in Souvenir).

  • Kumar, D., Teotia, S.S. and Khattri, K.N., 1997, The representation of attenuation characteristics of strong ground motions observed in the 1986 Dharamsala and 1991 Uttarkashi earthquakes by available empirical relations, Current Sci. 73, 543–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, D., Khattri, K.N., Teotia, S.S. and Rai, S.S., 1999, Modelling of accelerograms for two Himalayan earthquakes using a novel semi empirical method and estimation of accelerogram for a hypothetical great earthquake in the Himalaya, Current Sci. 76, 819–830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W.H.K. and Stewart, S.W., 1981, Principles and Applications of Microearthquake Networks, Academic Press, New York, pp. 293.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, R.K., 1977, Seismic design spectra and mapping procedures using hazard analysis based directly on oscillator response, J. earthquake Eng. Strut. Dyn. 5, 211–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, C. and Hartzell, S., 1988, Inversion for slip distribution using teleseismic P waveforms, North Palm Springs, Borah Peak, and Michoacan earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 78, 1092–1111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, R.P., 1993, Pressure, temperature and time constraints on metamorphism across the Main Central Thrust zone and High Himalayan Slab in Garhwal Himalaya, Himalayan Tectonics, Geological Society Special Publication no. 74, Treloar, P.J. and Searle, M.P. (eds), pp. 485–510.

  • Midorikawa, S., 1989, Synthesis of ground acceleration of large earthquakes using acceleration envelope waveform of small earthquake, J. Struct. Constr. Engin. 398, 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midorikawa, S., 1993, Semi empirical estimation of peak ground acceleration from large earthquakes, Tectonophysics 218, 287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugnuia, L. and Brune, J.M., 1984, Simulations of strong ground motions for eathquakes in the Mexicali-Imperial valley, Proc. of workshop on strong ground motion simulation and earthquake engineering applications, Pub. 85-02 Earthquake Engineering Research Institue, Los Altos, California, 21-1-21-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negi, R.S., Nawani, P.C., Rawat, J.S., Agarwal, K.K., Sawat, P.V., Gairola, B.M., Tripathi, S.K., Khanduri, K.C., Singh, Bhupendra, Dangwal, D.P., 1999, Macroseismic effects and related geotechnical problems caused by Chamoli earthquake on 29th March, 1999 in parts of Garhwal Himalaya, (Abs.), Workshop on Chamoli earthquake and its impact, Department of Science and Technology, India.

  • Pande, P., Singh, R.K., Gupta, S.K. and Joshi, K.C., 1999, A Review of seismotectonics of Garhwal Himalaya – An explanation of the mechanics of 29th March, 1999 Chamoli earthquake, (Abs.), Workshop on Chamoli earthquake and its impact, Department of Science and Technology, India.

  • Paul, S.K., Rautela, P. and Lakhera, R.C., 1999, Interrelationship of co-seismic fractures with tectonic setup of the area: A study of 28th March, 1999 Chamoli earthquake, (Abs.), Workshop on Chamoli earthquake and its impact, Department of Science and Technology, India.

  • Reiter, L., 1990, Earthquake Hazard Analysis – Issues and Insights, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, R. (ed.), 1989, Handbook of fault parameters of Japanese earthquakes, Kajima, Tokyo (in Japanese).

  • Sharpe, R.L., 1982, An investigation of the correlation between earthquake ground motion and building performance, Appl. Tech. Counc. Rept. ATC-10, Palo Alto, California.

  • Sinozuka, M. and Sato, Y., 1967, Simulation of nonstationary random processes, Proc. ASCE 93, 11–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinvhal, A., Sinvhal, H., Jain, A.K., Manickavasagam, R.M., Joshi, A. and Joshi, G., 1992, Modelling of Uttarkashi earthquake of October 20, 1991 in terms of seismic microzonation and causative fault (Abst.), In: Synthesis of the Uttarkashi earthquake Data, 20th Oct, 1991 and Seismotectonics of Garhwal-Kumaon Himalaya, New Delhi, pp. 42–43.

  • Thakur, V.C. and Rohella, R.K., 1999, Geodynamic model for Chamoli earthquake of March 29, 1999 and seismic hazard assesment in the Garhwal Kumaon region, Workshop on Chamoli earthquake and its impact, Department of Science and Technology, India.

  • Toro, G.R. and McGuire, R.K., 1987, An investigation into earthquake ground motion characteristics in eastern north America, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 77, 468–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trifunac, M.D. and Brady, A.G., 1975, A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 65, 581–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdiya, K.S., 1977, Structural setup of the Kumaon lesser Himalaya, In: Himalayan Science de la terre, Centre Nationale Recherche Science, Paris 268, 449–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, G., 1994, Some aspect of earthquake seismology: Slip partitioning along major convergent plate boundaries; composite source model for estimation of strong motion; and nonlinear soil response modelling, Ph.D. thesis, University of Nevada, Reno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, G., Khattri, K.N., Anderson, J.G., Brune, J.N. and Zeng, Y., 1995, Strong ground motion from the Uttarkashi earthquake, Himalaya, India, Earthquake: Comparison of observations with synthetics using the composite source model, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 85, 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Y., Anderson, J.G. and Su, F., 1994, A composite source model for computing realistic synthetic strong ground motions, Geophys. Res. Lett. 21, 725–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Y., Aki, K. and Teng, T.L., 1993, Mapping of the high frequency source radiation for the loma prieta earthquake, California, J. Geophys. Res. 98, 11981–11993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth Sciences, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, 136 119, Haryara, 136 119, India

    A. Joshi

Authors
  1. A. Joshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joshi, A. Strong motion envelope modelling of the source of the Chamoli earthquake of March 28, 1999 in the Garhwal Himalaya, India. Journal of Seismology 5, 499–518 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012067306009

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012067306009

Search

Navigation