Skip to main content
Log in

On the mechanics of the arrow: Archer's Paradox

  • Published:
Journal of Engineering Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In ancient bows the grip of the bow was in the way of the arrow. The arrow needed to get round the bow while being accelerated; this phenomenon is called the ‘Archer's Paradox’. In the forties it was observed experimentally with high-speed cameras that the arrow vibrates in a horizontal plane perpendicular to the vertical median plane of the bow. These movements are started and controlled by the movements of the two points of contact with the bow, viz. the middle of the string in contact with the rear end of the arrow and the grip where the arrow slides along the bow. The latter contact imposes a moving-boundary condition. The numerically obtained results are satisfactorily in agreement with experimental data. The model can be used to estimate the drawing force of ancient bows of which only the contemporary arrows are available and also for the design of new archery equipment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. N. Hickman, F. Nagler, and P. E. Klopsteg. Archery: the technical side. Redland (CA): National Field Archery Association (1947) 281pp.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Hardy. Longbow. Sparkford (Somerset, UK): Patrick Stephens Limited (1992) 244pp.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. F. Paterson. A “Mary Rose” archery symposium. Journal of the Society of Archer-Antiquaries 26 (1983) 49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Pekalski. Modelling and simulation research of the competitor-bow-arrow system (in Polish). PhD thesis, Academy of Physical Education, Warsaw (1987) 122pp.

  5. R. Pekalski. Experimental and theoretical research in archery. Journal of Sports Sciences 8 (1990) 259–279.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. W. Kooi. On the Mechanics of the Bow and Arrow. PhD thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen (1983) 211pp.

  7. B. W. Kooi and J. A. Sparenberg. On the static deformation of a bow. Journal of Engineering Mathematics 14 (1980) 27–45.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. W. Kooi. On the mechanics of the bow and arrow. Journal of Engineering Mathematics 15 (1981) 119–145.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. W. Kooi. On the mechanics of the modern working-recurve bow. Computational Mechanics 8 (1991) 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Gallozzi, L. M. Leonardi, A. Pace, and G. Caselli. A new method to measure lateral bow accelerations during shooting in archery. In: G. Bergmann, R. Kölbel, and A. Rohlmann (eds.), Biomechanics: Basic and Applied Research (1987) pp. 639–644.

  11. L. M. Leonardi, C. Gallozzi, A. Pace, and A. Dal Monte. Reduction of lateral bow displacement using different torque flight compensators and stabilizers in archery. In: G. Bergmann, R. Kölbel, and A. Rohlmann, editors, Biomechanics: Basic and Applied Research (1987) pp. 633–638.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kooi, B., Sparenberg, J. On the mechanics of the arrow: Archer's Paradox. Journal of Engineering Mathematics 31, 285–303 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004262424363

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004262424363

Navigation