Skip to main content
Log in

Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy as a safe procedure for pediatric uncomplicated appendicitis: a comparison with laparoscopic and open appendectomy in a randomized clinical trial

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Deemed as a safe and easily performed procedure in children, transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULA) also offers several other advantages: reduced costs, a lower wound infection rate, fewer postoperative complications, and better cosmetic outcomes. The present investigation compares the results of three methods of appendectomies: 1-conventional, 2- laparoscopic, and 3- transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted.

Methods

The current study enrolled 210 patients and divided them into three groups of 70 each. Each group underwent one of the three methods of appendectomy. In TULA, the appendix exteriorized from the umbilicus laparoscopically, and then an extra-corporeal appendectomy was performed. The surgical approaches for the other two patient groups were standard techniques normally utilized in laparoscopic (LA) and open appendectomy (OA).

Results

In TULA, the mean operation length was significantly shorter than that in LA. Regarding scar size, the smallest were from the TULA group, with a significant difference in surgical wound size when compared with those of the other two groups. The length of the hospital stay was significantly shorter for TULA and LA patients than for OA patients. In addition, there was a lower wound infection rate associated with TULA than with LA and OA.

Conclusions

TULA is an alternative method of appendectomy in uncomplicated pediatric acute appendicitis. Compared to other approaches, TULA is technically easier, has a shorter operation time, offers better surgical outcomes, involves less surgical site infections, and results in excellent cosmetic results.

Trial registration

The trial is registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT id: IRCT201703088375N12).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

TULA:

Trans-umbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy

OA:

Open appendectomy

LA:

Laparoscopic appendectomy

SILA:

Single incision laparoscopic appendectomy

References

  1. Semm K (1983) Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 15:59–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Masoomi H, Mills S, Dolich MO et al (2012) Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2006–2008. World J Surg 36:573–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Taqi E, Al Hadher S, Ryckman J et al (2008) Outcome of laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg 43:893–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chandler NM, Ghazarian SR, King TM et al (2014) Cosmetic outcomes following appendectomy in children: a comparison of surgical techniques. J Laparo-endosc Adv Surg Tech A 24:584–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Esposito C, Calvo AI, Castagnetti M et al (2012) Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in the pediatric population: a literature review and analysis of complications. J Laparo-endosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:834–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ze Zhang, YananWang, Ruoyan Liu, Liying Zhao, Hao Liu, Jianming Zhang, Guoxin Li. Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 50 (2015) 1600–1609.

  7. Lee SL, Stark R, Yaghoubian A et al (2011) Does age affect the outcomes and management of pediatric appendicitis? J Pediatr Surg 46:2342–2345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gorter RR, Heij HA, Eker HH et al (2014) Laparoscopic appendectomy: state of the art. Tailored approach to the application of laparoscopic appendectomy? Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 28:211–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tashiro J, Einstein SA, Perez EA, Bronson SN, Lasko DS, Sola JE (2016) Hospital preference of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: effects on outcomes in simple and complicated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 51:804–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sporn E, Petroski GF, Mancini GJ et al (2009) Laparoscopic appendectomy—is it worth the cost? Trend analysis in the US from 2000 to 2005. J Am Coll Surg 208(2):179–85.e172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA (2010) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD001546

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michailidou M, Goldstein SD, Sacco Casamassima MG et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: the effect of surgical technique on healthcare costs. Am J Surg 210:270–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li X, Zhang J, Sang L et al (2010) Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastro-enteral 10:129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Markar SR, Blackburn S, Cobb R et al (2012) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis in children. J Gastrointest Surg 16(10):1993–2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Garg CP, Vaidya BB, Chengalath MM (2009) Efficacy of laparoscopy in complicated appendicitis. Int J Surg 7(3):250–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pelosi MA, Pelosi MA III (1991) Laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo oophorectomy using a single umbilical puncture. N J Med 88:721–726

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ohno Y, Morimura T, Hayashi S (2012) Transumbilical laparoscopically assisted appendectomy in children: the results of a single-port, single-channel procedure. Surg Endosc 26:523–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Deie K, Uchida H, Kawashima H et al (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in children: exteriorization of the appendix is a key component of a simple and cost-effective surgical technique. Pediatr Surg Int 29:1187–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bergholz R, Klein I, Wenke K et al (2014) Midterm outcome of trans-umbilical laparoscopic-assisted versus laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children, a matched prospective study. Eur J Pediatr Surg

  20. Boo YJ, Lee Y, Lee JS (2016) Comparison of transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy versus single incision laparoscopic appendectomy in children: which is the better surgical option? J Pediatr Surg 51:1288–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wei HB, Huang JL, Zheng ZH et al (2010) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Surg Endosc 24:266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. York D, Smith A, von Allmen D, Phillips JD (2006) Laparoscopic appendectomy in children after the learning curve. JSLS 10(4):447–452

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Pier A, Gotz F, Bacher C (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy in 625 cases: from innovation to routine. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:8–13

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Saye WB, Rives DA, Cochran EB (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy: 3 years’ experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(2):109–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Frutos MD, Abrisqueta J, Lujan J et al (2013) Randomized prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendectomy versus umbilical single-incision appendectomy. Ann Surg 257:413–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Visnjic S (2008) Transumbilical laparoscopically assisted appendectomy in children: high-tech low-budget surgery. Surg Endosc 22:1667–1671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mohana A, Karamb PA, Butac MR, Worley S, Seifarth FG (2016) Transumbilical laparoscopically assisted extracorporeal appendectomy in children and young adults. Int J Surg 36A:261–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Muensterer OJ, Puga Nougues C, Adibe OO et al (2010) Appendectomy using single incision pediatric endosurgery for acute and perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 24:3201–3204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim JH, Kim HY, Park SK et al (2015) Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: experiences from 1208 cases of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 262:1054–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Xiao Y, Shi G, Zhang J, Cao JG, Liu LJ, Chen TH, Li ZZ, Wang H, Zhang H, Lin ZF, Lu JH, Yang T (2015) Surgical site infection after laparoscopic and open appendectomy: a multicenter large consecutive cohort study. Surg Endosc. 29(6):1384–1393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3809-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chandler NM, Danielson PD (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy vs multiport laparoscopic appendectomy in children: a retrospective comparison. J Paediatr Surg 45:2186–2190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Blenman T (2010) Incisions do not simply sum. Surg Endosc 24(7):1746–1751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Carter J (2014) A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Single-Incision Laparoscopic (SILS) versus conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for the treatment of acute appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 218(5):2145–2154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Namir K, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242(3):439–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA (2017) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Collab 47:105–109

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mohan A, Karam PA, Buta MR et al (2016) Transumbilical laparoscopically assisted extracorporeal appendectomy in children and young adults: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 36:261–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jin SG, Cho SH, Kim KY, Ahn SK, Hwang JW, Cho JW, Jung BW, Kim BC, Yoon SN (2019) Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) is useful in adults and young adolescents: comparison with multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy. Medicina 55(6):248

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This investigation has been done in Imam Reza hospital, department of general surgery at Birjand University of medical sciences. It is approved by Ethics Committee of Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Reference number: Ir.bums.REC.1395.264. This manuscript is in Clinical trial category.

Funding

The source of funding for this research is vice chancellor for research, Birjand University of Medical Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. A. K. Vejdan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This clinical trial doesn’t have any conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

In this investigation, all of the private patient’s information are blinded and there is nothing as potentially identifiable patient information.

Informed consent

Consent form is consisting of, detail of benefits and risks of three methods of surgeries and signed by all of the patients.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vejdan, S.A.K., Khosravi, M. & Amirian, Z. Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy as a safe procedure for pediatric uncomplicated appendicitis: a comparison with laparoscopic and open appendectomy in a randomized clinical trial. J Ped Endosc Surg 3, 39–46 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42804-020-00087-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42804-020-00087-1

Keywords

Navigation