Skip to main content
Log in

Adverse Events and Efficacy of Cixutumumab in Phase II Clinical Trials: A systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Cixutumumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R). We sought to evaluate the efficacy of cixutumumab in the treatment of cancer, and to comprehensively assess the associated adverse events in phase II clinical trials.

Methods

Data were collected from PubMed, Embase, and Clinicaltrials.gov. The improvement on progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated by hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). We also carried a meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the incidence of adverse events.

Results

The adverse events that were mentioned most frequently were hyperglycemia, anemia, nausea, fatigue, and thrombocytopenia. The most frequent adverse events were hyponatremia (40.28%), fatigue (35.18%), and skin rash (35.11%). Results showed that cixutumumab treatments did not benefit PFS (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.83–1.26, p = 0.979). The complete response (CR) was rarely seen in phase II trials.

Conclusions

Cixutumumab was well tolerated when used alone and in combination therapies, but its antitumor activity was low in the existing phase II clinical trials. An acceptable incidence of adverse effects supports further investigation of this drug, provided that it shows antitumor activity in combination with other drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108. doi:10.3322/caac.21262.

    Google Scholar 

  2. DeSantis CE, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Siegel RL, Stein KD, Kramer JL, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(4):252–71. doi:10.3322/caac.21235.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sawyers C. Targeted cancer therapy. Nature. 2004;432(7015):294–7. doi:10.1038/nature03095.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weinstein IB. Cancer. Addiction to oncogenes—the Achilles heel of cancer. Sci (New York, NY). 2002;297(5578):63–4. doi:10.1126/science.1073096.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yee D. Insulin–like growth factor receptor inhibitors: baby or the bathwater? J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(13):975–81. doi:10.1093/jnci/djs258.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Nastiuk KL, Krolewski JJ. Opportunities and challenges in combination gene cancer therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;98:35–40. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2015.12.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pardee AB. G1 events and regulation of cell proliferation. Sci (New York, NY). 1989;246(4930):603–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cross M, Dexter TM. Growth factors in development, transformation, and tumorigenesis. Cell. 1991;64(2):271–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Iams WT, Lovly CM. Molecular pathways: clinical applications and future direction of insulin–like growth factor–1 receptor pathway blockade. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(19):4270–7. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-2518.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Stewart AJ, Johnson MD, May FE, Westley BR. Role of insulin–like growth factors and the type I insulin–like growth factor receptor in the estrogen–stimulated proliferation of human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 1990;265(34):21172–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee AV, Jackson JG, Gooch JL, Hilsenbeck SG, Coronado–Heinsohn E, Osborne CK et al. Enhancement of insulin–like growth factor signaling in human breast cancer: estrogen regulation of insulin receptor substrate–1 expression in vitro and in vivo. Mol Endocrinol (Baltimore, Md). 1999;13(5):787–96. doi:10.1210/mend.13.5.0274.

  12. Rowinsky EK, Youssoufian H, Tonra JR, Solomon P, Burtrum D, Ludwig DL. IMC–A12, a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody to the insulin–like growth factor I receptor. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(18 Pt 2):5549s–55s. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-1109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Macaulay VM, Middleton MR, Protheroe AS, Tolcher A, Dieras V, Sessa C, et al. Phase I study of humanized monoclonal antibody AVE1642 directed against the type 1 insulin–like growth factor receptor (IGF–1R), administered in combination with anticancer therapies to patients with advanced solid tumors. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(3):784–91. doi:10.1093/annonc/mds511.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Naing A, Kurzrock R, Burger A, Gupta S, Lei X, Busaidy N, et al. Phase I trial of cixutumumab combined with temsirolimus in patients with advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(18):6052–60. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-2979.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma H, Zhang T, Shen H, Cao H, Du J. The adverse events profile of anti–IGF–1R monoclonal antibodies in cancer therapy. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;77(6):917–28. doi:10.1111/bcp.12228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McKian KP, Haluska P. Cixutumumab. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2009;18(7):1025–33. doi:10.1517/13543780903055049.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Burtrum D, Zhu Z, Lu D, Anderson DM, Prewett M, Pereira DS, et al. A fully human monoclonal antibody to the insulin–like growth factor I receptor blocks ligand–dependent signaling and inhibits human tumor growth in vivo. Cancer Res. 2003;63(24):8912–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sachdev D, Singh R, Fujita-Yamaguchi Y, Yee D. Down–regulation of insulin receptor by antibodies against the type I insulin–like growth factor receptor: implications for anti–insulin–like growth factor therapy in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66(4):2391–402. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-3126.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang Y, Sun Y. Insulin–like growth factor receptor–1 as an anti–cancer target: blocking transformation and inducing apoptosis. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2002;2(3):191–207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reidy DL, Vakiani E, Fakih MG, Saif MW, Hecht JR, Goodman-Davis N, et al. Randomized, phase II study of the insulin–like growth factor–1 receptor inhibitor IMC–A12, with or without cetuximab, in patients with cetuximab– or panitumumab–refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(27):4240–6. doi:10.1200/jco.2010.30.4154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Schwartz GK, Tap WD, Qin LX, Livingston MB, Undevia SD, Chmielowski B, et al. Cixutumumab and temsirolimus for patients with bone and soft–tissue sarcoma: a multicentre, open–label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(4):371–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Philip PA, Goldman B, Ramanathan RK, et al. Dual blockade of epidermal growth factor receptor and insulin-like growth factor receptor-1 signaling in metastatic pancreatic cancer: phase Ib and randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine, erlotinib, and cixutumumab versus gemcitabine plus erlotinib (SWOG S0727). Cancer. 2014;120(19):2980–5. doi:10.1002/cncr.28744.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu EY, Li H, Higano CS, Agarwal N, Pal SK, Alva A, et al. SWOG S0925: a randomized phase II study of androgen deprivation combined with cixutumumab versus androgen deprivation alone in patients with new metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(14):1601–8. doi:10.1200/jco.2014.59.4127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wagner LM, Fouladi M, Ahmed A, Krailo MD, Weigel B, DuBois SG, et al. Phase II study of cixutumumab in combination with temsirolimus in pediatric patients and young adults with recurrent or refractory sarcoma: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015;62(3):440–4. doi:10.1002/pbc.25334.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hussain M, Rathkopf DE, Liu G, Armstrong AJ, Kelly WK, Ferrari AC, et al. A phase II randomized study of cixutumumab (IMC–A12: CIX) or ramucirumab (IMC–1121B: RAM) plus mitoxantrone (M) and prednisone (P) in patients (pts) with metastatic castrate–resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) following disease progression (PD) on docetaxel. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(5_suppl):97.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gradishar WJ, Yardley DA, Layman R, Sparano JA, Chuang E, Northfelt DW, et al. Clinical and translational results of a phase II, randomized trial of an anti–IGF–1R (Cixutumumab) in women with breast cancer that progressed on endocrine therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(2):301–9. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-0588.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hanna NH, Dahlberg SE, Kolesar JM, Aggarwal C, Hirsch FR, Ramalingam SS, et al. Three–arm, randomized, phase 2 study of carboplatin and paclitaxel in combination with cetuximab, cixutumumab, or both for advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who will not receive bevacizumab–based therapy: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study (E4508). Cancer. 2015;121(13):2253–61. doi:10.1002/cncr.29308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Weickhardt A, Doebele R, Oton A, Lettieri J, Maxson D, Reynolds M, et al. A phase I/II study of erlotinib in combination with the anti–insulin–like growth factor–1 receptor monoclonal antibody IMC–A12 (cixutumumab) in patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7(2):419–26. doi:10.1097/JTO.0b013e31823c5b11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Malempati S, Weigel B, Ingle AM, Ahern CH, Carroll JM, Roberts CT, et al. Phase I/II trial and pharmacokinetic study of cixutumumab in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors and Ewing sarcoma: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(3):256–62. doi:10.1200/jco.2011.37.4355.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schoffski P, Adkins D, Blay JY, Gil T, Elias AD, Rutkowski P et al. An open–label, phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the anti–IGF–1R antibody cixutumumab in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic soft–tissue sarcoma or Ewing family of tumours. Eur J Cancer (Oxford, England: 1990). 2013;49(15):3219–28. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.010.

  31. Weigel B, Malempati S, Reid JM, Voss SD, Cho SY, Chen HX, et al. Phase 2 trial of cixutumumab in children, adolescents, and young adults with refractory solid tumors: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61(3):452–6. doi:10.1002/pbc.24605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rajan A, Carter CA, Berman A, Cao L, Kelly RJ, Thomas A, et al. Cixutumumab for patients with recurrent or refractory advanced thymic epithelial tumours: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(2):191–200. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(13),70596-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Abou-Alfa GK, Capanu M, O’Reilly EM, Ma J, Chou JF, Gansukh B, et al. A phase II study of cixutumumab (IMC-A12, NSC742460) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2014;60(2):319–24. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2013.09.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dean JP, Montgomery RB, Wan J, Cohen P, Haugk K, Corman JM, et al. On-target activity of neoadjuvant cixutumumab and combined androgen deprivation therapy for high–risk prostate cancer: a phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(7):S12.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Argiris A, Lee J, Schiller JH, Pittsburgh UO, Pittsburgh Institute DFC, et al. E3508: A phase II randomized trial of carboplatin (C), paclitaxel (P), and bevacizumab (B) with or without IMC-A12 (cixutumumab) in patients with advanced nonsquamous, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(15_suppl):TPS221.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Naing A, LoRusso P, Fu S, Hong DS, Anderson P, Benjamin RS, et al. Insulin growth factor-receptor (IGF-1R) antibody cixutumumab combined with the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus in patients with refractory Ewing’s sarcoma family tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(9):2625–31. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-0061.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Scagliotti GV, Felip E, Besse B, von Pawel J, Mellemgaard A, Reck M, et al. An open–label, multicenter, randomized, phase II study of pazopanib in combination with pemetrexed in first–line treatment of patients with advanced–stage non–small–cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8(12):1529–37. doi:10.1097/jto.0000000000000005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Belani CP, Dahlberg SE, Rudin CM, Fleisher M, Chen HX, Takebe N et al. Three-arm randomized phase II study of cisplatin and etoposide (CE) versus CE with either vismodegib (V) or cixutumumab (Cx) for patients with extensive stage–small cell lung cancer (ES–SCLC) (ECOG 1508). J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(15_suppl), abstract 7508.

  39. Glisson BS, Tseng JE, Marur S. Randomized phase II trial of cixutumumab alone or with cetuximab for refractory recurrent/metastatic squamous cancer of head and neck. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(15_suppl), abstract 6030.

  40. Cohen SJ, Feng Y, Catalano PJ, Mitchell EP, O’Dwyer PJ, Lubner SJ et al. E2208: Randomized phase II study of paclitaxel with or without the anti–IGF–IR antibody cixutumumab (IMC–A12) as second–line treatment for patients with metastatic esophageal or GE junction cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(15_suppl), abstract 3020.

  41. Haluska P, Bernath AM, Ballman KV, Dueck AC, Linden HM, Goetz MP et al. Randomized phase II trial of capecitabine and lapatinib with or without cixutumumab in patients with HER2+ breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and an anthracycline and/or a taxane: NCCTG N0733 (Alliance). 2014;32(15_suppl), abstract 632.

  42. Clinicaltrials.gov. IMC-A12 with mitotane vs mitotane alone in recurrent, metastatic, or primary ACC that cannot be removed by surgery. 2014. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00778817?term=NCT00778817&rank=1.

  43. Clinicaltrials.gov. Cixutumumab and Temsirolimus in treating patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. 2015. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00699491?term=NCT00699491&rank=1.

  44. Higano C, Alumkal J, Ryan CJ, Yu EY, Beer TM, Chandrawansa K et al. A phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of single agent IMC A12, a monoclonal antibody (MAb), against the insulin–like growth factor–1 receptor (IGF–IR), as monotherapy in patients with metastastic, asymptomatic castration–resistant prostate ca. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(15_suppl), abstract 5142.

  45. Clinicaltrials.gov. Cixutumumab in treating patients with metastatic melanoma of the eye. 2015. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01413191?term=NCT01413191&rank=1.

  46. Clinicaltrials.gov. Phase II study of IMC–A12 in patients with mesothelioma who have been previously treated with chemotherapy. 2015. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01160458?term=NCT01160458&rank=1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yibing Wang or Jiajun Du.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This work was supported by Medicine and Health Science Technology Development Plan of Shandong Province (2013WS0103) and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2014HQ028) and Provincial science and technology development plan of Shandong (2015GSF118063).

Conflict of interest

All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form (available on request from the corresponding author) and no support from any organization for the submitted work and no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years. No other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Additional information

H. Cao and L. Cui contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, H., Cui, L., Ma, W. et al. Adverse Events and Efficacy of Cixutumumab in Phase II Clinical Trials: A systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Drug Investig 37, 135–153 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-016-0475-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-016-0475-y

Keywords

Navigation