Skip to main content
Log in

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and hepatitis virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma risk in Asian population

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Tumor Biology

This article was retracted on 20 April 2017

Abstract

To investigate the association between X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) Arg399Gln polymorphism and hepatitis virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma risk, we performed a systematic meta-analysis of eligible case–control studies. Eligible studies were identified from the PubMed, Embase, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases up to March 2013. The odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) of XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism in hepatitis virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma cases compared with those in controls were calculated. The meta-analysis was performed using fixed-effect or random-effect methods according to the absence or presence of heterogeneity. This meta-analysis included 1,558 cases with hepatitis virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma and 1,338 controls. Meta-analysis of available data showed that there was no association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and risk of hepatitis virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma under all contrast models (Gln vs. Arg: fixed-effect OR = 0.92, 95 % CI 0.82–1.04, P = 0.18; GlnGln vs. ArgArg: random-effect OR = 0.79, 95 % CI 0.50–1.25, P = 0.32; GlnGln/ArgGln vs. ArgArg: fixed-effect OR = 0.92, 95 % CI 0.79–1.07, P = 0.28; and GlnGln vs. ArgArg/ArgGln: random-effect OR = 0.83, 95 % CI 0.52–1.34, P = 0.45). Sensitivity analysis further showed that there was no association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and risk of hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma under all contrast models (Gln vs. Arg: fixed-effect OR = 0.93, 95 % CI 0.82–1.05, P = 0.25; GlnGln vs. ArgArg: fixed-effect OR = 0.86, 95 % CI 0.64–1.16, P = 0.32; GlnGln/ArgGln vs. ArgArg: fixed-effect OR = 0.93, 95 % CI 0.80–1.10, P = 0.41; and GlnGln vs. ArgArg/ArgGln: fixed-effect OR = 0.85, 95 % CI 0.63–1.13, P = 0.26). Our meta-analysis of the available data did not find an obvious effect of XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism on hepatitis-related hepatocellular carcinoma. More well-designed studies with large sample are needed to further verify the effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. El-Serag HB. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1118–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:10–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ganem D, Prince AM. Hepatitis B virus infection—natural history and clinical consequences. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1118–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Webster DP, Klenerman P, Collier J, Jeffery KJ. Development of novel treatments for hepatitis C. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9:108–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Farazi PA, DePinho RA. Hepatocellular carcinoma pathogenesis: from genes to environment. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:674–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tiniakos DG, Vos MB, Brunt EM. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: pathology and pathogenesis. Annu Rev Pathol. 2010;5:145–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ginsberg G, Angle K, Guyton K, Sonawane B. Polymorphism in the DNA repair enzyme XRCC1: utility of current database and implications for human health risk assessment. Mutat Res. 2011;727:1–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Xue H, Ni P, Lin B, Xu H, Huang G. X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) genetic polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk: a huge review and meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173:363–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Qian B, Zhang H, Zhang L, Zhou X, Yu H, Chen K. Association of genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair pathway genes with non-small cell lung cancer risk. Lung Cancer. 2011;73:138–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen CC, Yang SY, Liu CJ, Lin CL, Liaw YF, Lin SM, et al. Association of cytokine and DNA repair gene polymorphisms with hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:1310–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kiran M, Saxena R, Chawla YK, Kaur J. Polymorphism of DNA repair gene XRCC1 and hepatitis-related hepatocellular carcinoma risk in Indian population. Mol Cell Biochem. 2009;327:7–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jung SW, Park NH, Shin JW, Park BR, Kim CJ, Lee JE, et al. Polymorphisms of DNA repair genes in Korean hepatocellular carcinoma patients with chronic hepatitis B: possible implications on survival. J Hepatol. 2012;57:621–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bose S, Tripathi DM, Sukriti, Sakhuja P, Kazim SN, Sarin SK. Genetic polymorphisms of CYP2E1 and DNA repair genes HOGG1 and XRCC1: association with hepatitis B related advanced liver disease and cancer. Gene. 2013;519:231–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gulnaz A, Sayyed AH, Amin F, Khan A, Aslam MA, Shaikh RS, et al. Association of XRCC1, XRCC3, and XPD genetic polymorphism with an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma because of the hepatitis B and C virus. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;25:166–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cochran WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. 1954;10:101–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22:719–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50:1088–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Han Y, Yang J, Zheng S, Wu Y. Study on the association of human XRCC1-399 single nucleotide polymorphism and primary hepatocytic carcinoma [article in Chinese]. Chin Hepatol. 2004;9:235–7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ren Y, Wang D, Li Z. Study on the relationship between gene XRCC1 codon 399 single nucleotide polymorphisms and primary hepatic carcinoma in Han nationality [article in Chinese]. Chin J Clin Hepatol. 2008;24:361–4.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liu F, Li B, Wei Y, Yan L, Wen T, Zhao J, et al. XRCC1 genetic polymorphism Arg399Gln and hepatocellular carcinoma risk: a meta-analysis. Liver Int. 2011;31:802–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dong LM, Potter JD, White E, Ulrich CM, Cardon LR, Peters U. Genetic susceptibility to cancer: the role of polymorphisms in candidate genes. JAMA. 2008;299:2423–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Brennan P, Hainaut P, Boffetta P. Genetics of lung-cancer susceptibility. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:399–408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiwei Li.

Additional information

The Publisher and Editor retract this article in accordance with the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). After a thorough investigation we have strong reason to believe that the peer review process was compromised.

An erratum to this article can be found online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-017-5487-6.

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, D., Jiang, H., Gu, Q. et al. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and hepatitis virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma risk in Asian population. Tumor Biol. 34, 3265–3269 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-0899-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-0899-4

Keywords

Navigation