Skip to main content
Log in

Development and characterization of twenty-five new polymorphic microsatellite markers in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Genes & Genomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Millets such as proso millet have excellent nutritional properties and could become a basic resource for crop breeding programs and food diversification. In this study, 25 polymorphic microsatellite markers were developed and characterized through construction of an SSR-enriched library from genomic DNA of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). In total, 110 alleles were detected, with an average of 4.4 alleles per locus. Values of major allele frequency (M AF ) and expected heterozygosity (H E ) ranged from 0.36 to 0.98 (mean = 0.73) and from 0.04 to 0.74 (mean = 0.37), respectively. The mean genetic similarity coefficient was 0.3711, indicating that among 50 accessions of proso millet there was wide genetic variation. The newly developed microsatellite markers should be useful tools for assessing genetic diversity, understanding population structure, and breeding of proso millet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chang K (1968) Archeology of ancient China. Science 162: 519–526.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit A, Jin MH, Chung JW, Yu JW, Chung HK, Ma KH, Park YJ and Cho EG (2005) Development of polymorphic microsatellite markers in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Mol. Ecol. Notes 5: 736–738.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geervani P and Eggum BO (1989) Nutrient composition and protein quality of minor millets. Plant Foods for Human Nutrit. 39: 201–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gwag JG, Chung JW, Chung HK, Lee JH, Ma KH, Dixit A, Park YJ, Cho EG, Kim TS and Lee SH (2006) Characterization of new microsatellite markers in mung bean, Vigna radiata (L.). Mol. Ecol. Notes 6: 1132–1134.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goff SA, Ricke D, Lan TH, Presting G, Wang R, Dunn M, Glazebrook J, Sessions A, Oeller P and Varma H et al. (2005) A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science 296: 92–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He GH, Meng RH, Newman M, Gao GQ, Pittman RN and Prakash CS (2003) Microsatellites as DNA markers in cultivated peanut. BMC Plant Biol. 3: 3–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jana K and Jan M (2006) Content and quality of protein in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) varieties. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 61: 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia XP, Zhang ZB, Liu YH, Zhang CW, Shi YS, Song YC, Wang TY and Li Y (2009) Development and genetic mapping of SSR markers in foxtail millet [Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv.]. Theor. Appl. Genet. 118: 821–829.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kantety RV, Rota ML, Matthews DE and Sorrells ME (2002) Data mining for simple sequence repeats in expressed sequence tags from barley, maize, rice, sorghum and wheat. Plant Mol. Biol. 48: 501–510.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karam D, Westra P, Nissen SJ, Ward SM and Figueiredo JEF (2004) Genetic diversity among proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) biotypes assessed by AFLP technique. Planta Daninha 22: 167–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KY (2004) Developing one-step program (SSR Manager) for rapid identification of clones with SSRs and primer designing. MS thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, the Republic of Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagercrantz U, Ellegren H and Andersson L (1993) The abundance of various polymorphic SSR motifs differs between plants and vertebrates. Nucl. Acids. Res. 21: 1111–1115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lágler R, Gyulai G, Humphreys M, Szabó Z, Horváth L, Bittsánszky A, Kiss J, Holly L and Heszky L (2005) Morphological and molecular analysis of common millet (P. miliaceum) cultivars compared to a DNA sample from the 15th century (Hungary). Euphytica 146: 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu KJ and Muse SV (2005) PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics 21: 2128–2129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li ZK, Yu SB, Lafitte HR, Huang L, Courtois B, Hittalmani S, Vijayakumar CHM, Liu GF, Wang GC and Shashidhar HE et al. (2003) QTL×environment interactions in rice. I. Heading date and plant height. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1108: 141–153.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ma KH, Dixit A, Kim YC, Lee DY, Kim TS, Cho EG and Park YJ (2007) Development and characterization of new microsatellite markers for ginseng (Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer). Conserv. Genet. 8: 1507–1509.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma KH, Gwag JG, Zhao WG, Dixit A, Lee GA, Kim HH, Chung IM, Kim NS, Lee JS and Ji JJ et al. (2009) Isolation and characteristics of eight novel polymorphic microsatellite loci from the genome of garlic (Allium sativum L.). Scien. Hort. 122: 355–361.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin JH, Leonard WH and Stamp DL (1976) Principles of field crop production, 3rd edition. MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York, pp. 415–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgante M, Hanafey M and Powell W (2002) Microsatellites are preferentially associated with nonrepetitive DNA in plant genomes. Nat. Genet. 30: 194–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgante M and Olivieri AM (1993) PCR-amplified SSRs as markers in plant genetics. Plant J. 3: 175–182.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • M’Ribu HK and Hilu KW (1994) Detection of interspecific and intraspecific variation in Panicum millets through random amplified polymorphic DNA. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88: 412–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mun KH, Kim DJ, Choi HK, Gish J, Debelle F, Mudge J, Denny R, Endre G, Saurat O and Dudez AM et al. (2006) Distribution of SSRs in the genome of Medicago truncatula: aresource of genetic markers that integrate genetic and physical maps. Genetics 172: 2541–2555.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Powell W, Machray GC and Provan J (1996) Polymorphism revealed by simple sequence repeats. Trends Plant Sci. 1: 215–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rota ML, Kantety RV, Yu JK and Sorrells ME (2005) Nonrandom distribution and frequencies of genomic and EST-derived SSR markers in rice, wheat, and barley. BMC Genomics 6: 23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat. Biotech. 18: 233–234.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M and Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 1596–1599.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Varshney RK, Thiel T, Stein N, Langridge P and Graner A (2002) In silico analysis on frequency and distribution of SSRs in ESTs of some cereal species. Cell Mol. Biol. Lett. 7: 537–546.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weber JL (1990) Informativeness of human (dC-dA)n (dG-dT)n polymorphism. Genomics 7: 524–530.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh FC, Yang RC and Boyle T (1999) POPGENE Version 1.31. Microsoft Windows-based freeware for population genetic analysis. Quick User Guide. University of Alberta and Centre for International Forestry Research, Alberta, Canada, pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zane L, Bargelloni L and Patarnello T (2002) Strategies for microsatellite isolation: a review. Mol. Ecol. 11: 1–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-Jin Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cho, YI., Chung, JW., Lee, GA. et al. Development and characterization of twenty-five new polymorphic microsatellite markers in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Genes Genom 32, 267–273 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-010-0007-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-010-0007-8

Keywords

Navigation