Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Spanish Version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS): Measurement Invariance and Psychometric Properties

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Mindfulness Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the measurement invariance and psychometric properties of a Spanish-language version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) in a U.S. sample. A total of 609 undergraduate students, including 325 bilingual (Spanish-speaking) participants, from a Hispanic-majority institution completed the assessment battery and were included in the analyses. The MAAS and the Spanish-language Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS-SP) were shown to be equivalent via multigroup confirmatory factor analysis models testing configural, metric, and scalar invariance. A test of latent mean differences indicated a small, but statistically significant cross-language difference in trait mindfulness as construed by the MAAS, as the latent mean of the MAAS-SP was slightly higher compared with the latent mean of the MAAS. The MAAS-SP evidenced good psychometric properties and concurrent validity. Taken together, findings support the reliability and validity of the MAAS and MAAS-SP in measuring mindfulness across languages. Future studies could continue efforts aimed at examining the structure of mindfulness and its facets across languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astin, J. A. (1997). Stress reduction through mindfulness meditation. Effects on psychological symptomatology, sense of control, and spiritual experiences. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 66(2), 97–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: a conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Assessment, 11(3), 191–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergomi, C., Tschacher, W., & Kupper, Z. (2012a). The assessment of mindfulness with self-report measures: existing scales and open issues. Mindfulness, Advance online publication, doi:10.1007/s12671-012-0110-9.

  • Bergomi, C., Tschacher, W., & Kupper, Z. (2012b). Measuring mindfulness: first steps towards the development of a comprehensive mindfulness scale. Mindfulness, Advance online publication, doi:10.1007/s12671-012-0102-9.

  • Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L. E., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W., Lonner, W. J., & Thorndike, E. M. (1973). Cross-cultural research methods. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., & Cordon, S. (2009). Toward a phenomenology of mindfulness: subjective experience and emotional correlates. In F. Didonna (Ed.), Clinical Handbook of Mindfulness (pp. 59–81). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., West, A. M., Loverich, T. M., & Biegel, G. M. (2011). Assessing adolescent mindfulness: validation of an adapted Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in adolescent normative and psychiatric populations. Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 1023–1033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M., & Stewart, S. M. (2006). The MACS approach to testing for multigroup invariance of a second-order structure: a walk through the process. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(2), 287–321. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1302_7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: the issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 456–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardaciotto, L., Herbert, J. D., Forman, E. M., Moitra, E., & Farrow, V. (2008). The assessment of present-moment awareness and acceptance: the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale. Assessment, 15(2), 204–223. doi:10.1177/1073191107311467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, L. E., & Brown, K. W. (2005). Validation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in a cancer population. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 58(1), 29–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catak, P. D. (2012). The Turkish version of Mindful Attention Awareness Scale: preliminary findings. Mindfulness, 3(1), 1–9. doi:10.1007/s12671-011-0072-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, P., Hember, M., Symes, J., Peters, E., Kuipers, E., & Dagnan, D. (2008). Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: reliability and validity of the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (SMQ). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47(4), 451–455. doi:10.1348/014466508x314891.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W. (2008). Testing equivalence in the structure, means, and variances of higher-order constructs with structural equation modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 11(3), 593–613. doi:10.1177/1094428106298973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M. S., Charoensuk, S., Gilbert, B. D., Neary, T. J., & Pearce, K. L. (2009). Mindfulness in Thailand and the United States: a case of apples versus oranges? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(6), 590–612. doi:10.1002/jclp.20580.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, K., Hartman, M., & Fredrickson, B. (2010). Deconstructing mindfulness and constructing mental health: understanding mindfulness and its mechanisms of action. Mindfulness, 1(4), 235–253. doi:10.1007/s12671-010-0033-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuéllar, I., Arnold, B., & Maldonado, R. (1995). Acculturation rating scale for Mexican Americans-II: a revision of the original ARSMA Scale. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 17(3), 275–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, P., Guerrero, G., Goggin, J. P., & Ellis, B. B. (1999). Self-assessment of linguistic skills by bilingual Hispanics. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 21(1), 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Y.-Q., Li, S., Tang, Y.-Y., Zhu, L.-H., Ryan, R., & Brown, K. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Chinese translation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). Mindfulness, 3(1), 10–14. doi:10.1007/s12671-011-0074-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimidjian, S., & Linehan, M. M. (2003a). Defining an agenda for future research on the clinical application of mindfulness practice. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 166–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimidjian, S., & Linehan, M. M. (2003b). Mindfulness practice. In W. O'Donohue, J. E. Fisher, & S. C. Hayes (Eds.), Cognitive behavior therapy: applying empirically supported techniques in your practice (pp. 229–237). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberth, J., & Sedlmeier, P. (2012). The effects of mindfulness meditation: a meta-analysis. Mindfulness, 3, 174–189. doi:10.1007/s12671-012-0101-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, G., Hayes, A. M., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: the development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29(3), 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, P. R., & Siegel, R. D. (2005). Buddhist and Western psychology: seeking common ground. In C. K. Germer, R. D. Siegel, & P. R. Fulton (Eds.), Mindfulness and psychotherapy (pp. 28–51). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germer, C. K., Siegel, R. D., & Fulton, P. R. (Eds.). (2005). Mindfulness and psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. (2002). One dharma: the emerging Western Buddhism. San Francisco: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59(2), 93–104. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.2.93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gregorich, S. E. (2006). Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework. Medical Care, 44(11 Suppl 3), S78–S94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. (2008). On measuring mindfulness in psychosomatic and psychological research. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 64(4), 405–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. (2011). Defining mindfulness by how poorly I think I pay attention during everyday awareness and other intractable problems for psychology's (re)invention of mindfulness: comment on Brown et al. (2011). Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 1034–1040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., Niemann, L., Schmidt, S., & Walach, H. (2004). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits: a meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57(1), 35–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, G. R. (1997). Structural equation modeling methods of hypothesis testing of latent variable means. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30(2), 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, E., Lundh, L.-G., Homman, A., & Wångby-Lundh, M. (2009). Measuring mindfulness: pilot studies with the Swedish versions of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale and the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 38(1), 2–15. doi:10.1080/16506070802383230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. M., & Feldman, G. (2004). Clarifying the construct of mindfulness in the context of emotion regulation and the process of change in therapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 255–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Shenk, C. (2004). Operationalizing mindfulness without unnecessary attachments. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 249–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Witt, A. A., & Oh, D. (2010). The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(2), 169–183. doi:10.1037/a0018555.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S., Malik, M. L., & Lee, M.-K. (2003). Testing configural, metric, scalar, and latent mean invariance across genders in sociotropy and autonomy using a non-Western sample. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(4), 636–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18(3), 117–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jermann, F., Billieux, J., Larøi, F., Argembeau, A., Bondolfi, G., Zermatten, A., et al. (2009). Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS): psychometric properties of the French translation and exploration of its relations with emotion regulation strategies. Psychological Assessment, 21(4), 506–514. doi:10.1037/a0017032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36(4), 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80. Chicago: Scientific Software International, Inc.

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1982). An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: theoretical considerations and preliminary results. General Hospital Psychiatry, 4(1), 33–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. New York: Bantam Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (2005). Coming to our senses: healing ourselves and the world through mindfulness. New York: Hyperion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledesma, D., & Kumano, H. (2009). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and cancer: a meta-analysis. Psycho-Oncology, 18(6), 571–579. doi:10.1002/pon.1400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(1), 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.4.1.84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKillop, J., & Anderson, E. J. (2007). Further psychometric validation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29(4), 289–293. doi:10.1007/s10862-007-9045-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Kit-Tai, H., & Zhonglin, W. (2004). In search of golden rules: comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P., & Marsh, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: non-centrality and goodness of fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. doi:10.1007/bf02294825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalak, J., Heidenreich, T., Ströhle, G., & Nachtigall, C. (2008). Die deutsche version der Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS): psychometrische befunde zu einem achtsamkeitsfragebogen. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie: Forschung und Praxis, 37(3), 200–208. doi:10.1026/1616-3443.37.3.200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reise, S. P., Widaman, K. F., & Pugh, R. H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 552–566.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, F. P., Mathews, H. L., & Witek-Janusek, L. (2003). Psycho-endocrine-immune response to mindfulness-based stress reduction in individuals infected with the human immunodeficiency virus: a quasiexperimental study. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 9(5), 683–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, B. (1997). Mindfulness-based stress reduction in the inner city. Advances, 13(4), 50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, B., & Creaser, T. (1997). Mindfulness meditation-based stress reduction: experience with a bilingual inner-city program. The Nurse Practitioner, 22(3), 150–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, B., & Robbins, D. (2004). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health-related quality of life: findings from a bilingual inner-city patient population. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66(1), 113–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, B., & Stanley, T.-W. (2002). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and healthcare utilization in the inner city: preliminary findings. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 8(1), 60–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507–514. doi:10.1007/bf02296192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2002). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: a new approach to preventing relapse. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. L., Brown, K. W., Thoresen, C., & Plante, T. G. (2011). The moderation of mindfulness-based stress reduction effects by trait mindfulness: results from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(3), 267–277. doi:10.1002/jclp.20761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, H. B., & Kominski, R. A. (2010). Language use in the United States: 2007. American Community Survey Reports (Vol. ACS-12): U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.

  • Soler, J., Tejedor, R., Feliu-Soler, A., Pascual, J. C., Cebolla, A., Soriano, J., et al. (2012). Psychometric proprieties of Spanish version of Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). Actas Españolas De Psiquiatría, 40(1), 19–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. The Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–90. doi:10.1086/209528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H. (1999). STATISTICA power analysis. Tulsa: StatSoft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. M. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2011). Population Estimates Data V2011. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/popest/data/national/asrh/2011/index.html. Accessed 23 Sept 2012.

  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–69. doi:10.1177/109442810031002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walach, H., Buchheld, N., Buttenmüller, V., Kleinknecht, N., & Schmidt, S. (2006). Measuring mindfulness–The Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Personality and Individual Differences, 40(8), 1543–1555. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher J. Johnson.

Appendix. Spanish version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS-SP)

Appendix. Spanish version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS-SP)

Experiencias Diarias

Instrucciones: Enseguida encontrará una serie de declaraciones sobre su experiencia diaria. Usando la escala 1–6 que aparece enseguida, por favor indique con qué frecuencia tiene, en la actualidad, cada una de las experiencias. Por favor responda de acuerdo lo que realmente refleja su experiencia, en lugar de responder lo que usted piensa que su experiencia debería ser. Por favor trate cada oración por separado, independiente de las demás.

1

2

3

4

5

6

Casi siempre

Con mucha frecuencia

Con algo de frecuencia

Con poca frecuencia

Con muy poca frecuencia

Casi nunca

  1. 1.

    Podría estar experimentando alguna emoción y no estar consciente de ello hasta cierto tiempo después.

  2. 2.

    Rompo o se me caen las cosas por descuido, por no poner atención, o por estar pensando en otra cosa.

  3. 3.

    Me resulta difícil mantenerme enfocado en lo que está pasando en el presente.

  4. 4.

    Tiendo a caminar rápido para llegar adonde voy sin poner atención a lo que voy experimentando en el camino.

  5. 5.

    Tiendo a no darme cuenta de sensaciones físicas de tensión o incomodidad hasta que realmente se apoderan de mi atención.

  6. 6.

    Se me olvida el nombre de una persona tan pronto como me lo dicen por primera vez.

  7. 7.

    Pareciera que funciono “en automático”, sin estar muy consciente de lo qué estoy haciendo.

  8. 8.

    Realizo actividades de prisa sin ponerles realmente atención.

  9. 9.

    Me enfoco tanto en una meta que quiero alcanzar, que pierdo la noción de lo que estoy haciendo ahora para alcanzarla.

  10. 10.

    Hago trabajos automáticamente, sin darme cuenta de lo que estoy haciendo.

  11. 11.

    Me doy cuenta de que escucho a alguien con un oído, mientras hago algo más al mismo tiempo.

  12. 12.

    Manejo en ‘piloto automático’ y después de llegar a un lugar me pregunto por qué llegue allí.

  13. 13.

    Me doy cuenta de que me preocupo del futuro o del pasado.

  14. 14.

    Me doy cuenta de que hago las cosas sin poner atención.

  15. 15.

    Como entre comidas sin darme cuenta de que estoy comiendo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, C.J., Wiebe, J.S. & Morera, O.F. The Spanish Version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS): Measurement Invariance and Psychometric Properties. Mindfulness 5, 552–565 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-013-0210-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-013-0210-1

Keywords

Navigation