Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spatial heterogeneity of local flood vulnerability indicators within flood-prone areas in Taiwan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Global environmental change is bringing extreme precipitation, and the combination of natural and artificial impacts are resulting in serious floods on the west coast of Taiwan. Disparity in social, economic and infrastructure resources contributes to spatial variation in the vulnerability to flood disaster. Owing to the high frequency of torrential rain and serious land subsidence in the study area, this paper attempts to categorize vulnerability indicators under varied assumptions of spatial homogeneity and spatial heterogeneity. The results show that the spatial heterogeneity indeed affects the distribution of flood vulnerability indicators. The core value of this article is that it measures the improvement from using geographically weighted statistics rather than traditional statistics. For the flood vulnerability discussion, this paper demonstrates the importance of considering spatial heterogeneity when allocating resources against floods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A township refers to an administrative division contained within a county. Yunlin County, which contains the study area, contains 20 townships.

  2. A village refers to a basic autonomous unit that is below the level of a township.

  3. Vulnerability = Exposure + Susceptibility − Resilience.

References

  • Abdi H, Williams LJ (2010) Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdisciplin Review Comput Stat 2:433–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balica SF (2007) Development and Application of Flood Vulnerability Indices for Various Spatial Scales, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Delft, the Netherlands-IHE Institute for Water Education

  • Balica SF (2012) Applying the flood vulnerability index as a knowledge base for flood risk assessment. Delft University of Technology, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Balica SF, Douben N, Wright NG (2009) Flood vulnerability indices at varying spatial scales. W Sci Technol 60(10):2571–2580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett J, Lambert S, Fry I (2008) The hazards of indicators: insights from the environmental vulnerability index. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 98(1):102–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beek E (2006) Water resources development. UNESCO-IHE Institute, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizikova L, Bellali J, Habtezion Z, Diakhite M, Pinter L (2009) IEA Training Manual Volume Two: Vulnerability and Impact Assessments for Adaptation to Climate Change (via Module), United Nations Environment Program (United Nations Environment Program), Kenya

  • Bruijn KM, Klijn F (2009) Risky places in the Netherlands: a first approximation for floods. J Flood Risk Manag 7:58–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardona OD (2003) A need for rethinking the concept of vulnerability and risk from a holistic perspective: a necessary review and criticism for effective risk management. Available at: http://www.la-red.org/public/articulos/2003/nrcvrfhp/nrcvrfhp_ago-04-2003.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2016

  • Connor RF, Hiroki K (2005) Development of a method for assessing flood vulnerability. W Sci Technol 51(5):61–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Mitchell JT, Scott MS (1997) Handbook for conducting a GIS-Based hazards assessment at the Local Level. Report, South Carolina Emergency Preparedness Division, and Hazards Research Laboratory, Department of Geography, University of South Carolina

  • Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Quart 84(2):242–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Leon V, Carlos J (2006) Vulnerability—a conceptual and methodological review, vol 4. UNU Economic History Society, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Demšar U, Harris P, Brunsdon C, Fotheringham AS, McLoone S (2013) Principle component analysis on spatial data: an overview. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 103(1):106–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Nauro C (2006) Regional vulnerability map for supporting policy definitions and implementation. In: Proceedings of the applied multi-risk mapping of natural hazards for impact assessment (ARMONIA), in Barcelona, Spain, pp. 1–12

  • Dilley M (2005) Natural disaster hotspots: a global risk analysis. World Bank, Washington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eakin H, Lerner A, Murtinho F (2010) Adaptive capacity in evolving peri-urban spaces: responses to flood risk in the Upper Lerma River Valley, Mexico. Glob Env Chang 20:14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doubem KJ (2006) Characteristics of river floods and flooding: a global overview, 1985–2003. Irrig Drain 55:S9–S21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (1997) The Canada country study: climate impacts and adaptation, national summary for policymakers, Ottawa

  • Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon C, Charlton ME (2002) Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationships. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallopín GC (2006) Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Change 16(3):293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaume E, Gaál L, Viglione A, Szolgay J, Kohnová S, Blöschl G (2010) Bayesian MCMC approach to regional flood frequency analyses involving extraordinary flood events at ungauged sites. J Hydrol 394(1–2):101–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris P, Brunsdon C, Charlton M (2011) Geographically weighted principal components analysis. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 25(10):1717–1736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris P, Clarke A, Juggins S, Brunsdon C, Charlton M (2014) Enhancements to a geographically weighted princiap component analysis in the context of an application to an environmental data set. Geogr Anal 47(2):146–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haughton, J (2004) Living with environment change: social vulnerability, adaptation and resilience in Vietnam: Edited by W. Neil Adger, P. Mick Kelly, and Nguyen Huu Ninh. Routledge, London and New York, 2002. XXI + 314 pp., index, $90.00.”, Journal of Comparative Economics Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 367–369

  • Hinkel J (2011) Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity: towards a clarification of the science–policy interface. Glob Environ Change 21(1):198–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling H (1933) Analysis of a Complex of Statistical Variables into Principal Components. J Educ Psychol 24:417–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung HC, Chen LY (2012) An integrated assessment of vulnerability to typhoon and flood hazard in the ta-Chia river basin. J Geogr Sci 65:79–96

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2014) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, A Special Report of Working Groups II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York

  • Khan S (2012) Vulnerability assessments and their planning implications: a case study of the Hutt Valley. N Z Nat Hazards 64(2):1587–1607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein R (2004) Vulnerability indices—an academic perspective. In: Proceedings of the Expert Meeting, “Developing a Method for Addressing Vulnerability to Climate Change and Climate Change Impact Management: to Index or Not to Index?”, Bonn, Germany

  • Leichenko RM, O’Brien KL (2002) The dynamics of rural vulnerability to global change: the case of Southern Africa. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 7(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Tan S (2015) Nonstationary flood frequency analysis for annual flood peak series, adopting climate indices and check dam index as covariates. W Resour Manag 29(5):5533–5550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li JZ, Wang YX, Li SF, Hu R (2015) A nonstationary standardized precipitation index incorporating climate indices as covariates. J Geophys Res Atmos 120(23):12082–12095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liverman DM (1990) Vulnerability to Global Change, Clark University, Earth Transformed Program, Worcester

  • Lloyd CD (2010) Analysing population characteristics using geographically weighted principal components analysis: a case study of Northern Ireland in 2001. Comput Enviro Urban Syst 34(5):389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehaffey ML, Wainger T, Wade D, Yankee E, Smith VB, Yarbourgh R (2008) Assessing vulnerability from alternative development patterns. Landsc Urban Plan 87(1):84–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner F, Meyer V (2005) Flood damage, vulnerability and risk perception–challenges for flood damage research. UFZ-Umweltforschungszentrum, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M, Hirsch RM, Kundzewicz ZW, Lettenmaier DP, Stouffer RJ (2008) Stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science 319(5863):573–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandi D, Ashour AS, Samanta S, Chakraborty S, Salem MAM, Dey N (2015) Principle component analysis in medical image processing: a study. Int J Image Min 1(1):65–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obeysekera J, Salas JD (2014) Quantifying the uncertainty of design floods under nonstationary conditions. J Hydrol Eng 19(7):1438–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling M (2003) The vulnerability of cities. In: Pelling M (ed) Natural disaster and social resilience. Earthscan Publications, Sterling

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y (2013) Population vulnerability assessment based on scenario simulation of rainstorm-induced waterlogging: a case study of Xuhui District, Shanghai City. Nat Hazard 66(2):1189–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16(3):282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith K (2001) Environmental hazards: assessing risk and reducing disaster. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterr RK, Klein RJ, Reese S (2003) Climate change and costal zones: an overview of the state-of-the-art on regional and local vulnerability assessment. In: Giupponi C, Shechlter M (eds) Climate change in the Mediterranean socio-economic perspective of impacts vulnerability and adaptation. Edward Elgar Publishing House, Cheltenham, pp 245–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Strupczewski WG, Kochanek KM, Bogdanowicz E, Markiewicz I, Feluch W (2016) Comparison of two nonstationary flood frequency analysis methods within the context of the variable regime in the representative Polish rivers. Acta Geophys 64(1):206–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun AL, Shi C, Shi Y (2009) The preliminary inquiry of flood vulnerability space changes in coastal provinces and autonomous regions. Environ Sci Manag 34(3):36–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun X, Lall U, Merz B, Dung NV (2015) Hierarchical Bayesian clustering for nonstationary flood frequency analysis: application to trends of annual maximum flow in Germany. W Resour Res 51(8):6586–6601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2006) Using multivariate statistics, 5th edn. Allyn & Bacon, Needham

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobler WR (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ Geogr 46(Supplement):234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Luers A, Martello ML, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 100(14):8074–8079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN (2015) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction

  • UN/ISDR (2007) Hyogo framework for action 2005–2015: building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. UN/ISDR, Geneva

  • UNESCO-IHE (2007) Annual Report 2007. UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education

  • Villagrán C, Hazle G, Barrera F (2005) Hepáticas y Antocerotes del Archipiélago de Chile. Ediciones Museo Nacional de Historia Natural

  • Villarini G, Smith JA, Serinaldi F, Bales J, Bates PD, Krajewski WF (2009) Flood frequency analysis for nonstationary annual peak records in an urban drainage basin”. Adv W Resour 32(8):1255–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker G, Burningham K (2011) Flood risk, vulnerability and environmental justice: evidence and evaluation of inequality in a UK context. Crit Soc Polic 31(2):216–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong DWS, Lee J (2008) Statistical analysis of geographic information with ArcView GIS and ArcGIS. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu ZP, Hsiung KH (2009) Spatial analysis of urban fire risk. Chung Hua J Archit 3(3):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu JY, Huang YS (2011) The establishment of vulnerability evaluation indexed: the case of Shueili township, Nantou Taiwan. City Plan 38(2):195–218

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tzu-Ling Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, HS., Chen, TL. Spatial heterogeneity of local flood vulnerability indicators within flood-prone areas in Taiwan. Environ Earth Sci 75, 1484 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6294-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6294-x

Keywords

Navigation