Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture and consequences of a comminuted greater tubercle fragment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A prerequisite for a satisfying functional result in the treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus with hemiarthroplasty is anatomical reduction, fixation and healing of the tuberculi around the prosthetic neck in order to restore normal function of the rotator cuff.

Purpose

This was a retrospective study to examine the outcome after hemiarthroplasty using a prosthetic stem designed to optimise re-attachment and healing of the tuberculi (Aequalis; Tornier and Global Fx, DePuy). A special emphasis was on the effect on outcome a comminuted greater tubercle might have.

Materials and methods

At follow-up, clinical results were evaluated using the Constant score and WOOS index. All patients had radiographs taken of the injured shoulder. Quality of tubercle healing and prosthetic height were estimated; acromiohumeral distance was registered as well as greater tubercle comminution and resorption.

Results

Thirty-four patients with 35 hemiarthroplasties were included. Mean age was 71 years (range 47–88) at the time of injury. At follow-up (mean 38 months, range 23–67), the mean Constant score was 44 points (range 18–87). The mean WOOS index was 58 (range 15–96). A comminuted tubercle was associated with tubercle resorption and superior migration of the arthroplasty. Also, there was a correlation for the functional Constant score, but for the WOOS index, there was none.

Conclusion

Like several other studies, we generally saw a group of patients with limited pain but poor range of movement in the shoulder. Our hypothesis was that comminution of the greater tubercle would correlate with both rotator cuff arthropathic radiographical features and more detrimental functional scores than average. Thus, a subtype of fracture could be identified at the time of injury and perhaps be allocated to a different treatment than hemiarthroplasty. Due to a limited number of patients in this study, we are unable to make any strong statistically supported conclusions regarding this hypothesis.

Level of evidence

Level 4 evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Compito CA, Self EB, Bigliani LU (1994) Arthroplasty and acute shoulder trauma, reasons for success and failure. Clin Orth Rel Res 307:27–36

    Google Scholar 

  2. Neer CS (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures, Part II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. JBJS 52-A(6):1090–1103

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L, Walch G, Coste JS, Molé D (2002) Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcome after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. JSES 11(5):401–412

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bosch U, Skutek M, Fremerey RW, Tscherne H (1998) Outcome after primary and secondary hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with fracture of the proximal humerus. JSES 7(5):479–484

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mighell MA, Kolm GP, Collinge CA, Frankle MA (2003) Outcomes of hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus. JSES 12:569–577

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kralinger F, Schwaiger R, Wambacher M, Farrell E, Menth-Chiari W, Lajtai G, Hübner C, Resch H (2004) Outcome after primary hemiarthroplasty for fracture of the head of the humerus. JBJS(Am) 86-B:217–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Robinson CM, Page RS, Hill RM, Sanders DL, Court-Brown CM, Wakefield AE (2003) Primary Hemiarthroplasty for Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures. JBJS(Am) 85-A:1215–1223

    Google Scholar 

  8. Antuña SA, Sperling JW, Cofield RH (2008) Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for acute fractures of the proximal humerus: a minimum five-year follow-up. JSES 17(2):202–209

    Google Scholar 

  9. Loew M, Heitkemper S, Parsch D, Schneider S, Rickert M (2006) Influence of the design of the prosthesis on the outcome after hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder in displaced fractures of the head of the humerus. JBJS(Br) 88-B:345–350

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boileau P, Walch G (1999) Shoulder arthroplasty for fractures: problems and solutions. In: Walch G, Boileau P (eds) Shoulder arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, pp 297–314

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Zyto K, Wallace WA, Frostick SP, Preston BJ (1998) Outcome after hemiarthroplasty for three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. JSES 7(2):85–89

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Neer CS (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures, Part I. Classification and evaluation. JBJS 52-A(6):1077–1089

    Google Scholar 

  13. Boileau P, Tinsi L, LeHuec JC, Molé D, Sinnerton R, Walch G (1999) Results of shoulder arthroplasty in acute fracture of the proximal humerus. In: Walch G, Boileau P (eds) Shoulder arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, pp 331–345

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Le Huec JC, Boileau P, Sinnerton R, Hovorka I (1999) Tuberosity osteosynthesis in shoulder arthroplasty. In: Walch G, Boileau P (eds) Shoulder arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, pp 323–330

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Krishnan SG, Pennington SD, Burkhead WZ, Boileau P (2005) Shoulder arthroplasty for fracture: restoration of the “gothic arch”. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg 6(2):57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hughes M, Neer CS II (1975) Glenohumeral joint replacement and postoperative rehabilitation. Phys Ther 55:850–858

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Constant CR, Gerber C, Roger JH, Søjbjerg JO, Gohlke F, Boileau P (2008) A review of the Constant score: Modifications and guidelines for its use. JSES 17(2):355–361

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lo IK, Griffin S, Kirkley A (2001) The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for osteoarthritis of the shoulder: The Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index (WOOS). Osteo Cart 9:771–778

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Danish National Register for Shoulder Arthroplasty (2012). http://www.ortopaedi.dk/uploads/media/DSR_aarsrapport_2012_01.pdf

  20. Krishnan SG, Reineck JR, Bennion PD, Feher L, Burkhead WZ Jr (2011) Shoulder arthroplasty for fracture: Does a fracture-specific stem make a difference? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(12):3317–3323

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Boileau P, Pennington SD, Ghassani A (2011) Proximal fractures in young patients: fixation techniques and arthroplasty. JSES 20(suppl 2):S47–S60

    Google Scholar 

  22. Movin T, Sjödén GOJ, Ahrengart L (1998) Poor Function after shoulder replacement in fracture patients. Acta Orthop Scand 69(4):392–396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kontakis G, Koutras C, Tosounidis T, Giannoudis P (2008) Early management of proximal humeral fractures with hemiarthroplasty: a systematic review. JBJS(Br) 90:1407–1413

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cazeneuve JF (2008) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute fractures: retrospective long term outcomes. In: Boileau P, Molé D, Favard L, Levigne C, Sirveaux F (eds) Shoulder concepts. Sauramps Medical, Montpellier, pp 163–172

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bufquin T, Hersan A, Hubert L, Massin P (2007) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: a prospective review of 43 cases with short term follow-up. JBJS(Br) 89:516–520

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sirveaux F, Navez G, Favard L, Boileau P, Walsh G, Molé D (2006) Reverse prosthesis for acute proximal humeral fracture, the multicentric study. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Sauramps Medical, Paris, pp 73–80

    Google Scholar 

  27. Russo R, Rotonda GD, Cautiero F, Ciccarelli M (2015) Reverse shoulder prosthesis to treat complex proximal humeral fractures in the elderly patients: results after 10-year experience. Musculoskelet Surg 99(Suppl 1):S17–S23. doi:10.1007/s12306-015-0367-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brorson S, Rasmussen JV, Olsen BS, Frich LH, Jensen SL, Hróbjartsson A (2013) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in acute fractures of the proximal humerus: a systematic review. Int J Shoulder Surg 7(2):70–78

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Sebastiá-Forcada E, Cebrián-Gómez R, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Gil-Guillén V (2014) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. A blinded, randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23(10):1419–1426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Baudi P, Campochiaro G, Serafini F, Gazzotti G, Matino G, Rovesta C, Catani F (2014) Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty: comparative study of functional and radiological outcomes in the treatment of acute proximal humerus fracture. Musculoskelet Surg 98(Suppl 1):S19–S25. doi:10.1007/s12306-014-0322-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors or their families have not received any financial payment or other benefits from any commercial entities related to the subject of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Holbæk Hospital, Smedelundsgade 60, 4300, Holbæk, Denmark

    S. Hoel, T. G. Jensen, O. Falster & A. Ulstrup

Authors
  1. S. Hoel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. G. Jensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. O. Falster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Ulstrup
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Ulstrup.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoel, S., Jensen, T.G., Falster, O. et al. Hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture and consequences of a comminuted greater tubercle fragment. Musculoskelet Surg 100, 9–14 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-015-0393-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-015-0393-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation